Assessing Infrastructures Alternatives: The Implementation of a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP)

被引:0
|
作者
Cerreta, Maria [1 ]
Poli, Giuliano [1 ]
Somma, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Architecture, Via Toledo 402, Naples, Italy
关键词
Spatial indicators; Sustainability indicators; GIS-based evaluation method; Spatial road analysis; Landscape impacts; IMPACTS; TRANSPORT; MAP;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-87007-2_36
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The conventional approach that often dominated spatial planning has prioritized urban expansion and new urban transport infrastructure without fully considering environmental aspects. While this has generated new urban models and economies, it has also significantly impacted the territory and landscape negatively. The construction of road infrastructure can improve the sustainability of a city from the point of view of connectivity between places. However, it also generates a disruption of the landscape with a consequent loss of ecosystem services. The case study concerns the evaluation of the preferable alternative, between two proposals, for the construction of a new road called the Teramo-Mare, connecting the Abruzzo hinterland with the Adriatic coast. The methodological approach investigates the scientific background in landscape assessment related to the construction of road infrastructures. By modelling the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) with Fuzzy set theory and the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) an evaluation method is tested to face the choice of the preferable alternative. The study provides an initial review of the scientific reference landscape and identifying criteria to help evaluate the option that has the least impact on the landscape and ecological system.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 516
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Selection among renewable energy alternatives based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in Indonesia
    Tasri, Adek
    Susilawati, Anita
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2014, 7 : 34 - 44
  • [22] When should fuzzy analytic hierarchy process be used instead of analytic hierarchy process?
    Chan, Hing Kai
    Sun, Xuting
    Chung, Sai-Ho
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2019, 125
  • [23] Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Xu, Zeshui
    Liao, Huchang
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2014, 22 (04) : 749 - 761
  • [24] HESITANT FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
    Oztaysi, Basar
    Onar, Sezi Cevik
    Bolturk, Eda
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE 2015), 2015,
  • [25] Fuzzy prioritisation in the Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Mikhailov, L
    Yan, CM
    Harrison, C
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH JOINT CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, : 104 - 107
  • [26] Fuzzy Analytic Network Process for evaluating ERP post-implementation alternatives
    Ko, Jonghyeon
    Comuzzi, Marco
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2017,
  • [27] Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Business Site Selection
    Yap, Jeremy Y. L.
    Ho, Chiung Ching
    Ting, Choo-Yee
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICAST'18), 2018, 2016
  • [28] An evaluation of the research on analytic hierarchy process, AHP, on competency
    [J]. 1600, UK Simulation Society, Clifton Lane, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, United Kingdom (17):
  • [29] Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a Tool in Asset Allocation
    Abidin, Siti Nazifah Zainol
    Jaffar, Maheran Mohd
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES (SKSM20): RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES: A CATALYST FOR CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION, PTS A AND B, 2013, 1522 : 384 - 391
  • [30] Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction
    Darko, Amos
    Chan, Albert Ping Chuen
    Ameyaw, Ernest Effah
    Owusu, Emmanuel Kingsford
    Parn, Erika
    Edwards, David John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19 (05) : 436 - 452