Randomized trial comparing low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colectomy: PAROS trial

被引:7
|
作者
Celarier, S. [1 ]
Monziols, S. [2 ]
Francois, M. O. [1 ]
Assenat, V. [1 ]
Carles, P. [2 ]
Capdepont, M. [1 ]
Fleming, C. [1 ]
Rullier, E. [1 ]
Napolitano, G. [2 ]
Denost, Q. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Bordeaux Univ Hosp, Dept Digest Surg, Colorectal Unit, 1 Ave Magellan, F-33600 Pessac, France
[2] Bordeaux Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesia Ans Crit Care, 1 Ave Magellan, F-33600 Pessac, France
[3] Bordeaux Univ Hosp, Dept Digest Surg, 1 Ave Magellan, F-33600 Pessac, France
关键词
Laparoscopy; Colectomy; Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; SIGMOID RESECTION; VALVELESS TROCAR; CLINICAL-TRIAL; COLON-CANCER; SURGERY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-020-4140-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Laparoscopy, by its minimally invasive nature, has revolutionized digestive and particularly colorectal surgery by decreasing post-operative pain, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. In this trial, we aim to assess whether low pressure in laparoscopic colonic surgery (7 mm Hg instead of 12 mm Hg) could further reduce pain, analgesic consumption, and morbidity, resulting in a shorter hospital stay. Methods and analysis The PAROS trial is a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. We aim to recruit 138 patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a low-pressure group (7 mm Hg) or a standard-pressure group (12 mm Hg). The primary outcome will be a comparison of length of hospital stay between the two groups. Secondary outcomes will compare post-operative pain, consumption of analgesics, morbidity within 30 days, technical and oncological quality of the surgical procedure, time to passage of flatus and stool, and ambulation. All adverse events will be recorded. Analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of the impact of prolonged low-pressure and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum on myocardial injury after robot-assisted surgery in the Trendelenburg position: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Zhang, Xixue
    Wei, Jionglin
    Song, Xiaoxing
    Zhang, Yuhao
    Qian, Weiqing
    Sheng, Lu
    Shen, Zhoujun
    Yang, Lvjun
    Dong, Rong
    Gu, Weidong
    [J]. TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [42] Quality of recovery in patients under low- or standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum. A randomised controlled trial
    Moro, Eduardo T.
    Pinto, Persio C. C.
    Neto, Antonio J. M. M.
    Hilkner, Augusto L.
    Salvador, Luis F. P.
    da Silva, Beatriz R. D.
    Souto, Isabella G.
    Boralli, Renata
    Bloomstone, Joshua
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 65 (09) : 1240 - 1247
  • [43] Comparison of the impact of prolonged low-pressure and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum on myocardial injury after robot-assisted surgery in the Trendelenburg position: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Xixue Zhang
    Jionglin Wei
    Xiaoxing Song
    Yuhao Zhang
    Weiqing Qian
    Lu Sheng
    Zhoujun Shen
    Lvjun Yang
    Rong Dong
    Weidong Gu
    [J]. Trials, 17
  • [44] COMPARISON OF LOW-PRESSURE VERSUS STANDARD-PRESSURE FIXATION CARPENTIER-EDWARDS BIOPROSTHESIS
    FERNANDEZ, J
    CHEN, C
    GU, J
    BRDLIK, OB
    LAUB, GW
    MURPHY, MM
    ADKINS, MS
    ANDERSON, WA
    MCGRATH, LB
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1995, 60 (02): : S205 - S210
  • [45] Comparative analysis of low versus normal pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic gynecological surgeries: a randomized control trial
    Gaurav, Amrita
    Arora, Shivani
    Kumari, Om
    Khoiwal, Kavita
    Bora, Lihiri
    Gill, Poonam
    Panda, Shreya
    Chaturvedi, Jaya
    [J]. GAZZETTA MEDICA ITALIANA ARCHIVIO PER LE SCIENZE MEDICHE, 2024, 183 (1-2) : 54 - 63
  • [46] A Prospective Randomized, Controlled Study Comparing Low Pressure Versus High Pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Joshipura, Vismit Pradyumna
    Haribhakti, Sanjiv P.
    Patel, Nitin R.
    Naik, Rahul P.
    Soni, Harshad N.
    Patel, Bhavin
    Bhavsar, Mahendra S.
    Narwaria, Mahendra B.
    Thakker, Rashmi
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2009, 19 (03): : 234 - 240
  • [47] Effect of an individualized versus standard pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy on postoperative recovery: a randomized clinical trial in laparoscopic colorectal surgery
    Diaz-Catribronero, O.
    Mazzinari, G.
    Flor Lorente, B.
    Garcia Gregorio, N.
    Robles-Hernandez, D.
    Olmedilla Arnal, L. E.
    Martin de Pablos, A.
    Schultz, M. J.
    Errando, C. L.
    Argente Navarro, M. P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 (12) : 1605 - 1614
  • [48] Gas embolism under standard versus low pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic liver resection (GASES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Jin, Danfeng
    Liu, Mingyue
    Huang, Jian
    Xu, Yongfeng
    Liu, Luping
    Miao, Changhong
    Zhong, Jing
    [J]. TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [49] Comparison of Low Pressure versus high Pressure Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rehman, Pir Muneeb
    Ahmad, Farhan
    Anis, Saad Bin
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2018, 12 (04): : 1516 - 1518
  • [50] Gas embolism under standard versus low pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic liver resection (GASES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Danfeng Jin
    Mingyue Liu
    Jian Huang
    Yongfeng Xu
    Luping Liu
    Changhong Miao
    Jing Zhong
    [J]. Trials, 22