Global sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of the water quality model VFSMOD-W

被引:63
|
作者
Munoz-Carpena, Rafael [1 ]
Zajac, Z. [1 ]
Kuo, Y. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
computer modeling; grass buffers; hydrological modeling; model evaluation; probability of exceedance; sensitivity analysis; uncertainty analysis; vegetative filter strips; water quality;
D O I
10.13031/2013.23967
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This study presents the statistical evaluation of the vegetative filter strip modeling system VFSMOD-W as a tool to design vegetative filter strips to use in the mitigation plans required as a part of phosphate mining permitting process by the State of Florida. A two-step statistical evaluation framework using global techniques is presented based on: (1) a screening method (Morris) for qualitative ranking of parameters, and (2) a variance-based method (extended Fourier Analysis Sensitivity Test--extended FAST) for quantitative sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Measured characteristics of the central Florida phosphate-mining region are used to construct the 16 probability distributions of input factors. Two design filter lengths (3 and 6 m) and two model structures (VFSM--the filter module alone, and UH/VFSM--combined filter and source area components) are considered and compared to previous local "one-parameter-at-a-time" (OAT) analyses. It was found that for this application the filter's saturated hydraulic conductivity (VKS) was the most important factor controlling the filter runoff response, explaining over 90% of total output variance irrespective of model structure. In the case of the VFSM structure, sediment-related outputs were mainly influenced by three parameters: sediment particle size diameter (DP), effective flow width of the strip (FWIDTH), and VKS. For UH/VFSM. there were six important parameters: DP, the source area erosion and runoff parameters (slope of the source area Y, USLE soil erodibility index K, and runoff curve number CN), FWIDTH, and VXS. The results show the model's additive nature for this specific application, i.e., there are no significant parameter interactions for all model outputs except sediment outflow concentration and sediment wedge geometry. The uncertainty analysis indicates that regardless of the model structure, the probability of meeting a minimum required 75% sediment reduction was acceptable at the 90% confidence level for the 6 m long filter, but not for the 3 m filter In general the UH/VFSM model structure exhibited larger output uncertainty. Comparison with previous OAT analyses of the model indicates the importance of performing the global evaluation for each specific model application. The results illustrate four main products of the global analysis: ranking of importance of the VFSMOD-W parameters for different outputs, effect of changing modeling structure, type of influence of the important parameters, and assurance of the model's behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:1719 / 1732
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Posteriori Analysis of Analytical Models for Heap Leaching Using Uncertainty and Global Sensitivity Analyses
    Mellado, Mario E.
    Lucay, Freddy A.
    Cisternas, Luis A.
    Galvez, Edelmira D.
    Sepulveda, Felipe D.
    [J]. MINERALS, 2018, 8 (02)
  • [32] A sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a continental-scale water quality model of pathogen pollution in African rivers
    Reder, Klara
    Alcamo, Joseph
    Floerke, Martina
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2017, 351 : 129 - 139
  • [33] Unravelling the output uncertainty of a tree water flow and storage model using several global sensitivity analysis methods
    De Pauw, Dirk J. W.
    Steppe, Kathy
    De Baets, Bernard
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2008, 101 (01) : 87 - 99
  • [34] Improvement of the uncertainty method with model treatment and optimized global sensitivity analysis and its application to pressurized water reactor
    Xiong, Qingwen
    Gou, Junli
    Shan, Jianqiang
    Hui, Yongbo
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2020, 149
  • [35] GLOBAL UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF A FOOD-WEB BIOACCUMULATION MODEL
    Ciavatta, Stefano
    Lovato, Tomas
    Ratto, Marco
    Pastres, Roberto
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2009, 28 (04) : 718 - 732
  • [36] Global sensitivity analysis of model uncertainty in aeroelastic wind turbine models
    Kumar, P.
    Sanderse, B.
    Boorsma, K.
    Caboni, M.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF MAKING TORQUE FROM WIND (TORQUE 2020), PTS 1-5, 2020, 1618
  • [37] Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses for a SARS model with time-varying inputs and outputs
    McLeod, Robert G.
    Brewster, John F.
    Gumel, Abba B.
    Slonowsky, Dean A.
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2006, 3 (03) : 527 - 544
  • [38] Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses for FE thermal model of FRP panel exposed to fire
    Ramroth, WT
    Krysl, P
    Asaro, RJ
    [J]. COMPOSITES PART A-APPLIED SCIENCE AND MANUFACTURING, 2006, 37 (07) : 1082 - 1091
  • [39] Sensitivity and first-step uncertainty analyses for the preferential flow model MACRO
    Dubus, IG
    Brown, CD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2002, 31 (01) : 227 - 240
  • [40] Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of a decision analytic model for posteradication polio risk management
    Tebbens, Radboud J. Duintjer
    Pallansch, Mark A.
    Kew, Olen M.
    Sutter, Roland W.
    Aylward, R. Bruce
    Watkins, Margaret
    Gary, Howard
    Alexander, James
    Jafari, Hamid
    Cochi, Stephen L.
    Thompson, Kimberly M.
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2008, 28 (04) : 855 - 876