The evaluation of electricity generation resources: The case of Turkey

被引:25
|
作者
Topcu, Ilker [1 ]
Ulengin, Fusun [2 ]
Kabak, Ozgur [1 ]
Isik, Mine [3 ]
Unver, Berna [2 ]
Ekici, Sule Onsel [4 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Management, Ind Engn Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Sabanci Univ, Sabanci Sch Management, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Bogazici Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Bebek, Turkey
[4] Dogus Univ, Fac Engn, Ind Engn Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Electricity generation resources; Multi-attribute decision making; Monte Carlo simulation; Entropy; The Borda count election method; Sensitivity analysis; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; RENEWABLE ENERGY-POLICY; POWER-PLANTS; FUTURE; TECHNOLOGIES; DEMAND; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.126
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Electricity is the rising force among worldwide end-uses of energy. To meet the increasing demand, accurate policy decisions should be made considering each country's own dynamics. In fact, the selection of appropriate electricity generation resources necessitates the consideration of different aspects of the problem; hence, multi-attribute evaluation should be used. Topcu and Ulengin (2004) conducted a multi-attribute study to select the appropriate electricity generation resource in Turkey. To analyze the potential changes that may occur in electricity generation policy due to the recent dynamics in Turkey, the electricity generation resource selection problem is revisited in this research. Alternatives to be evaluated as well as the criteria to be used for evaluation are initially determined based on the synthesis of a literature survey and expert opinions. The alternatives are identified as solar photovoltaic (PV), wind, hydro, biomass, natural gas, coal, oil, and nuclear. The alternatives were evaluated using a new multiple-attribute decision making (MADM) approach based on the integration of Monte Carlo simulation, entropy, and Borda count methods. Besides updating data of Topcu and Ulengin, this new approach makes a significant contribution to the analysis stage as well. The results reveal that the primary electricity generation resources for Turkey should be a combination of renewable resources. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 427
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comprehensive evaluation of effects of straw-based electricity generation: A Chinese case
    Liu, Hongtao
    Polenske, Karen R.
    Xi, Youmin
    Guo, Ju'e
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (10) : 6153 - 6160
  • [32] Sustainability evaluation of decentralized electricity generation
    Karger, Cornelia R.
    Hennings, Wilfried
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (03): : 583 - 593
  • [33] Estimating the net electricity energy generation and demand using the ant colony optimization approach: Case of Turkey
    Toksari, M. Duran
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (03) : 1181 - 1187
  • [34] Determining optimum electricity generation technology under the reference and the 450 scenario in an emerging economy: The case of Turkey
    Ozkan-Gunay, E. Nur
    Goncu, Hasan Ali
    [J]. IKTISAT ISLETME VE FINANS, 2011, 26 (301): : 9 - 34
  • [35] Turkey's electricity generation problem and nuclear energy policy
    Agbulut, Umit
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2019, 41 (18) : 2281 - 2298
  • [36] Present Coal Potential of Turkey and Coal Usage in Electricity Generation
    Yilmaz, A. O.
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2009, 4 (02): : 135 - 144
  • [37] A Multidimensional Analysis of Electricity Generation Options with Different Scenarios in Turkey
    Boran, F. E.
    Dizdar, E.
    Toktas, I.
    Boran, K.
    Eldem, C.
    Asal, O.
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2013, 8 (01) : 44 - 55
  • [38] RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY GENERATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN TURKEY
    Gultekin, Ufuk
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2019, 28 (11): : 8171 - 8174
  • [39] An integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Turkey
    Atilgan, Burcin
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 93 : 168 - 186
  • [40] Total Electricity and Hydroelectric Energy Generation in Turkey: Projection and Comparison
    Akpinar, A.
    Komurcu, M. I.
    Ozolcer, I. H.
    Senol, A.
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2011, 6 (03) : 252 - 262