Class II:2 malocclusion-prevalence and progression of labial gingival recessions during Herbst-Multibracket appliance treatment

被引:3
|
作者
Bock, N. C. [1 ]
Killat, S.
Ruf, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Giessen, Dept Orthodont, Schlangenzahl 14, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
关键词
Class II; 2; Herbst treatment; Labial gingival recessions; Prevalence; Incidence; Magnitude; MANDIBULAR INCISORS; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; PERIODONTAL STATUS; PROCLINATION; MOVEMENT; INCLINATION; SEVERITY; THERAPY; ADULTS; WIDTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-020-03243-2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine the prevalence, incidence, and changes in magnitude of labial gingival recessions (LGR) in class II:2 patients during Herbst-Multibracket appliance (Herbst-MBA) treatment (Tx) plus retention. Subjects and methods All class II:2 patients of the Department of Orthodontics, University of Giessen, Germany who completed Herbst-MBA Tx (mean pre-Tx age 15.6 years). The cohort had undergone a Herbst phase (mean 8.1 months) as well as a subsequent MBA phase (mean 14.4 months). Study casts were evaluated from pre-Tx and after Herbst-MBA Tx plus >= 24 months of retention. Results Ratable pre-Tx and post-retention study casts (total observation period 53.5 +/- 10.3 months) were available from 94 out of 173 patients. No significant difference existed regarding pre-Tx LGR data between patients with and without complete records. The prevalence for teeth with LGR >= 0.5 mm was 1.4% pre-Tx respectively 6.7% post-retention. The highest values of up to 5.3% (pre-Tx) and 20.2% (post-retention) were determined for the upper first premolars and lower central incisors. Incidence values of 4.7% (all teeth) and up to 14.9% (upper first right premolars) respectively 11.1% (lower central incisors) were calculated (LGR >= 0.5 mm). The overall LGR mean magnitudes were 0.01 mm pre-Tx respectively 0.06 mm post-retention. Conclusions For the prevalence of LGR >= 0.5 mm an average increase of 5.3% was determined during approximate to 4.5 years of Herbst-MBA Tx plus retention. The highest incidence was seen for lower central incisors and upper right premolars (11.1/14.9%). The overall LGR mean magnitude increased by 0.05 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:3653 / 3660
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Long-term (≥ 15 years) outcome quality after Class II:1 bionator or Herbst multibracket appliance treatment A comparison
    Bock, Niko Christian
    Jungbauer, Rebecca
    Rudzki, Ingrid
    Proff, Peter
    Ruf, Sabine
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2024, 85 (04): : 260 - 269
  • [22] Effective and Efficient Herbst Appliance Therapy for Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Patient with a Low Degree of Collaboration with the Orthodontic Treatment
    Souki, Bernardo Quiroga
    Costa Bastos, Barbra Duque
    Ferro Araujo, Luana Fialho
    Moyses-Braga, Wagner Fernando
    Pantuzo, Mariele Garcia
    Cheib, Paula Loureiro
    CASE REPORTS IN DENTISTRY, 2015, 2015
  • [23] Perception of changes in soft-tissue profile after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion
    Neiva Nunes do Rego, Marcus Vinicius
    Martinez, Elizabeth Ferreira
    Ibiapina Coelho, Rogerio Menezes
    Portela Leal, Leanne Matias
    Thiesen, Guilherme
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 151 (03) : 559 - 564
  • [24] Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. A prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects
    Ruf, Sabine
    Pancherz, Hans
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2006, 28 (04) : 352 - 360
  • [25] Herbst appliance anchored to miniscrews with 2 types of ligation: Effectiveness in skeletal Class II treatment
    Manni, Antonio
    Mutinelli, Sabrina
    Pasini, Marco
    Mazzotta, Laura
    Cozzani, Mauro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 149 (06) : 871 - 880
  • [26] Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance
    Bock, Niko
    Ruf, Sabine
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2008, 30 (06) : 606 - 613
  • [27] Efficiency of Class II Malocclusion Treatment With Extraction of 2 Maxillary Premolars and the First Class Appliance Anchored in Mini-Implants
    Tonello, Diego Luiz
    Cavalcanti, Heloisa Nelson
    Lazaro, Vinicius Ribeiro de Almeida
    Bellini-Pereira, Silvio Augusto
    Castillo, Aron Aliaga-Del
    Henriques, Jose Fernando Castanha
    Garib, Daniela
    Janson, Guilherme
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [28] Discomfort, Expectations and Experiences during Treatment of Class II Malocclusion with Clear Block and Twin Block Appliance - A Pilot Survey
    Gurudatta, Navjeet Singh
    Kamble, Ranjit H.
    Sangtani, Jimmy K.
    John, Zynul A.
    Ahuja, Monika M.
    Khakhar, Prutha G.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2021, 10 (15): : 1064 - 1068
  • [29] Nonextraction treatment with temporary skeletal anchorage devices to correct a Class II Division 2 malocclusion with excessive gingival display
    Nishimura, Makoto
    Sannohe, Minayo
    Nagasaka, Hiroshi
    Igarashi, Kaoru
    Sugawara, Junji
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 145 (01) : 85 - 94
  • [30] Evaluation of external apical root resorption caused by fixed functional treatment of class II malocclusion Cast splint Herbst appliance vs. Forsus fatigue resistant device
    Coban, Gokhan
    Amuk, Nisa Gul
    Yagci, Ahmet
    Akgun, Gizem
    Abbood, Ihab Haitham Abbood
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2023, 84 (01): : 50 - 59