Organizational Justice Across Cultures: A Systematic Review of Four Decades of Research and Some Directions for the Future

被引:33
|
作者
Silva, Maria Rita [1 ]
Caetano, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] ISCTE Lisbon Univ Inst, Business Res Unit, Ave Forcas Armadas,Edificio ISCTE, P-1649026 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Cross-cultural; Contextual effects; Entity justice; Event justice; Organizational justice; Systematic review; EXPATRIATE PAY POLICIES; JOINT VENTURE HOTELS; DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; REWARD ALLOCATION; UNITED-STATES; CONFLICT-RESOLUTION; FAIRNESS; EQUITY; VALUES;
D O I
10.1007/s11211-016-0263-0
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This review aims to provide an overview of the main frameworks and findings of cross-cultural organizational justice research and some directions for future research. We systematically reviewed the literature and analysed 74 papers, which include more than one country, from the justice receiver perspective. We contribute to the literature in two ways. First, our analysis of methodological aspects highlights some limitations: most studies compare two countries, mainly China and the USA; cross-cultural equivalence checks are rare; and most studies do not directly measure culture, rather tend to use collectivism and power distance as post hoc explanations of country differences. Second, we offer a broad view of country differences by investigating contextual effects that go beyond national values. Our analysis of the influence of sociocultural influence levels shows that culture, socioeconomic development, organizational, situational, and individual characteristics interact to predict the development of and reactions to (in)justice across countries. A greater integration of levels is important for the advancement of research. Across cultures, more positive justice perceptions are related to positive outcomes, but are achieved differently, so organizations should be aware of sociocultural influences on employees' perceptions of justice.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 287
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions
    Ricarda B. Bouncken
    Johanna Gast
    Sascha Kraus
    Marcel Bogers
    [J]. Review of Managerial Science, 2015, 9 : 577 - 601
  • [22] Microfinance governance: a systematic review and future research directions
    Rasel, Md. Ali
    Win, Sandar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2020, 47 (07) : 1811 - 1847
  • [23] Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions
    Bouncken, Ricarda B.
    Gast, Johanna
    Kraus, Sascha
    Bogers, Marcel
    [J]. REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 9 (03) : 577 - 601
  • [24] Motherhood and consumption: A systematic review and directions for future research
    Freitas, Thalita Meyli Lin
    Leite, Ramon Silva
    Pinto, Marcelo de Rezende
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2024, 48 (04)
  • [25] Gamification for HRD: Systematic Review and Future Research Directions
    Thomas, Nibu John
    Baral, Rupashree
    Crocco, Oliver S.
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2022, 21 (02) : 198 - 224
  • [26] The Enneagram: A systematic review of the literature and directions for future research
    Hook, Joshua N.
    Hall, Todd W.
    Davis, Don E.
    Van Tongeren, Daryl R.
    Conner, Mackenzie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 77 (04) : 865 - 883
  • [27] Strategic flexibility: a systematic review and future research directions
    Chanphati, Jitrinee
    Thosuwanchot, Nongnapat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRATEGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 16 (03) : 470 - 491
  • [28] Impact of Leadership on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions
    Ahmad, Rahatulaain
    Nejati, Mehran
    Farr-Wharton, Ben
    Bentley, Tim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATIONAL STUDIES, 2024, 31 (03) : 338 - 367
  • [29] Reorganizing Organizational Politics Research: A Review of the Literature and Identification of Future Research Directions
    Ferris, Gerald R.
    Ellen, B. Parker, III
    McAllister, Charn P.
    Maher, Liam P.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 6, 2019, 6 : 299 - 323
  • [30] Organizational errors: Directions for future research
    Goodman, Paul S.
    Ramanujam, Rangaraj
    Carroll, John S.
    Edmondson, Amy C.
    Hofmann, David A.
    Sutcliffe, Kathleen M.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 31, 2011, 31 : 151 - 176