Steroid and Calcineurin Inhibitor-Sparing Protocols in Kidney Transplantation

被引:23
|
作者
Helal, I. [1 ]
Chan, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
PLUS MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; LONG-TERM; MAINTENANCE IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; REDUCED-EXPOSURE; DOUBLE-BLIND; CYCLOSPORINE; WITHDRAWAL; RECIPIENTS; BELATACEPT;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.054
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Recent improvements in kidney transplantation have been driven largely by lower acute rejection rates attributed to better immunosuppressive agents. In an effort to reduce the long-term toxicities of immunosuppressant drugs, corticosteroid- and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-sparing immunosuppression protocols have become increasingly popular in managing kidney transplant recipients. Nevertheless, these strategies may increase the risk of acute and chronic allograft injury (CAI) that may worsen the fate of transplant recipients. This article focuses on steroid and CNI sparing protocols to elucidate their safety and efficacy in patients receiving a kidney transplant. Steroid avoidance protocols are rapidly and increasingly being used. Studies have shown that corticosteroids are not essential to achieve excellent short- and intermediate-term results. However, the role of steroid withdrawal is only marginally beneficial and very often benefit overstated. CNI-sparing strategies have been used to help maintain the balance between allograft survival and nephrotoxicity. Trials evaluating CNI minimization have shown reduced incidence of CAI and preservation of allograft function. CNI withdrawal within 3 to 12 months after kidney transplantation improved graft function despite increased risk of acute rejection. This approach may be feasible with adequate exposure and proper usage of mammalian target of rapamacin inhibitors. Late withdrawal or conversion did not show a clear benefit. Timing and degree of renal dysfunction are key determining factors. With regards to CNI avoidance, earlier trials, such as the Symphony study, did not support the use of a CNI-free regimen of low-dose sirolimus as initial immunosuppression. However, recent studies using costimulatory blockade-based immusouppression showed that CNI avoidance is possible. The best maintenance immunosuppressive with CNI- or steroid-sparing is a work in progress and awaits longer term follow-up. The availability of newer biologics for costimulatory blockade and new immunosuppressive agents with novel mechanisms of action have the potential of using CNI- and steroid-sparing protocols to minimize the incidence of CAI and improve long-term outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 477
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improved Pulse Wave Velocity and Renal Function in Individualized Calcineurin Inhibitor Treatment by Immunomonitoring: The Randomized Controlled Calcineurin Inhibitor-Sparing Trial
    Sommerer, Claudia
    Brooke, Janina
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Schaier, Matthias
    Morath, Christian
    Meuer, Stefan
    Zeier, Martin
    Giese, Thomas
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 (03) : 510 - 520
  • [22] The Calcineurin Inhibitor-Sparing (CIS) Trial - individualised calcineurin-inhibitor treatment by immunomonitoring in renal allograft recipients: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Claudia Sommerer
    Matthias Schaier
    Christian Morath
    Vedat Schwenger
    Geraldine Rauch
    Thomas Giese
    Martin Zeier
    [J]. Trials, 15
  • [23] WOFIE synergizes with calcineurin. inhibitor treatment and early steroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation
    Dresske, B
    Zavazava, N
    Jenisch, S
    Exner, B
    Lenz, P
    El Mokhtari, NE
    Kremer, B
    Faendrich, F
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (08) : 1286 - 1291
  • [24] Calcineurin inhibitor avoidance versus steroid avoidance following kidney transplantation: Postoperative complications
    Shaffer, D.
    Kizilisik, A. T.
    Feurer, I.
    Nylander, W. A.
    Helderman, J. H.
    Langone, A. J.
    Schaefer, H. M.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (10) : 3464 - 3465
  • [25] The Calcineurin Inhibitor-Sparing (CIS) Trial - individualised calcineurin-inhibitor treatment by immunomonitoring in renal allograft recipients: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Sommerer, Claudia
    Schaier, Matthias
    Morath, Christian
    Schwenger, Vedat
    Rauch, Geraldine
    Giese, Thomas
    Zeier, Martin
    [J]. TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [26] Calcineurin inhibitor-sparing immunosuppressive protocols: PSGL-Ig plus RAPA/CsA prevents donor brain death induced injury to renal allografts
    Gasser, M
    Waaga-Gasser, AM
    Holthe, JEKV
    Lenhard, MS
    Shaw, GD
    Hancock, WW
    Tilney, NL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 : 359A - 359A
  • [27] Calcineurin-inhibitor minimization protocols in heart transplantation
    Zuckermann, Andreas Oliver
    Aliabadi, Arezu Z.
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 22 (01) : 78 - 89
  • [28] Protease inhibitor-sparing regimen suppresses HIV
    不详
    [J]. AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS, 1998, 12 (12) : 940 - 940
  • [29] Calcineurin inhibitor sparing immunosuppressive regimens in kidney allograft recipients
    Baczkowska, Teresa
    Durlik, Magdalena
    [J]. POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 119 (05): : 318 - 325
  • [30] Evidence for the Immunosuppressive Potential of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Sparing Regimens in Liver Transplant Recipients with Impaired Renal Function
    Tanimine, N.
    Ide, K.
    Tanaka, Y.
    Ishiyama, K.
    Onoe, T.
    Tashiro, H.
    Ohdan, H.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 94 (10) : 679 - 679