Comparison of Classification Algorithms Towards Subject-Specific and Subject-Independent BCI

被引:2
|
作者
Ghane, Parisa [1 ]
Zarnaghinaghsh, Narges [1 ]
Braga-Neto, Ulisses [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Subject-Specific BCI; Subject-independent BCI; Classification; Motor imagery; Sample size; MOTOR-IMAGERY; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1109/BCI51272.2021.9385339
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Motor imagery brain computer interface designs are considered difficult due to limitations in subject-specific data collection and calibration, as well as demanding system adaptation requirements. Recently, subject-independent (SI) designs received attention because of their possible applicability to multiple users without prior calibration and rigorous system adaptation. SI designs are challenging and have shown low accuracy in the literature. Two major factors in system performance are the classification algorithm and the quality of available data. This paper presents a comparative study of classification performance for both SS and SI paradigms. The present classification algorithms include two parametric (LDA and SVM) and two non-parametric (k-NN and CART) methods. Our results show that classification algorithms for SS models display large variance in performance. Therefore, distinct classification algorithms per subject may be required. SI models display lower variance in performance but should only be used if a relatively large sample size is available. For SI models, LDA and CART had the highest accuracy for small and moderate sample size, respectively. The source code of this paper is available at github.com/parisaghane/eegbciMI.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 347
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Subject-Dependent and Subject-Independent Emotion Classification Using Unimodal and Multimodal Physiological Signals
    Jatupaiboon, Noppadon
    Pan-Ngum, Setha
    Israsena, Pasin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2015, 5 (05) : 1020 - 1027
  • [22] RAISE: A Resistive Accelerator for Subject-Independent EEG Signal Classification
    Chen, Fan
    Song, Linghao
    Li, Hai Helen
    Chen, Yiran
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 DESIGN, AUTOMATION & TEST IN EUROPE CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (DATE 2021), 2021, : 340 - 343
  • [23] Subject-independent natural action recognition
    Ren, HB
    Xu, GY
    Kee, SC
    [J]. SIXTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATIC FACE AND GESTURE RECOGNITION, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 523 - 528
  • [24] Comparison of Designs Towards a Subject-Independent Brain-Computer Interface based on Motor Imagery
    Lotte, Fabien
    Guan, Cuntai
    Ang, Kai Keng
    [J]. 2009 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-20, 2009, : 4543 - 4546
  • [25] Subject-Independent Diver Gesture Classification Using Upper Limb Movement
    Ghader, Bilal
    Dune, Claire
    Watelain, Eric
    Hugel, Vincent
    [J]. IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS, 2024, 9 (11): : 9311 - 9318
  • [26] Subject-Specific Methodology in the Frequency Scanning Phase of SSVEP-Based BCI
    Rejer, Izabela
    Cieszynski, Lukasz
    [J]. HARD AND SOFT COMPUTING FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, MULTIMEDIA AND SECURITY, 2017, 534 : 123 - 132
  • [27] Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networks for Subject-Independent Motor Imagery Classification
    Bang, Ji-Seon
    Lee, Seong-Whan
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL WINTER CONFERENCE ON BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE (BCI2022), 2022,
  • [28] Subject-Independent Odor Pleasantness Classification Using Brain and Peripheral Signals
    Kroupi, Eleni
    Vesin, Jean-Marc
    Ebrahimi, Touradj
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING, 2016, 7 (04) : 422 - 434
  • [29] Subject-independent, SSVEP-based BCI: trading off among accuracy, responsiveness and complexity
    Mora, N.
    De Munari, I.
    Ciampolini, P.
    [J]. 2015 7TH INTERNATIONAL IEEE/EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING (NER), 2015, : 146 - 149
  • [30] A comparison of a subject-specific and a general measure of critical thinking
    Renaud, Robert D.
    Murray, Harry G.
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2008, 3 (02) : 85 - 93