Motivation for creativity in architectural design and engineering design students: implications for design education

被引:17
|
作者
Casakin, Hernan [1 ]
Kreitler, Shulamith [2 ]
机构
[1] Ariel Univ, Ctr Samaria, Sch Architecture, IL-44837 Ariel, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Psychol, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Creativity; Design education; Architecture; Engineering; Cognitive orientation; Motivation;
D O I
10.1007/s10798-009-9103-y
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The investigation reported here dealt with the study of motivation for creativity. The goals were to assess motivation for creativity in architectural design and engineering design students based on the Cognitive Orientation theory which defines motivation as a function of a set of belief types, themes, and groupings identified as relevant for the development of creativity. Differences between the two groups of students were expected in some of the scores of the belief types, themes, and groupings. Participants were 112 students (52 from architecture, and 60 from engineering) who were administered the questionnaire of the Cognitive Orientation of Creativity. Significant differences in numerous motivational contents were observed between the groups of students. Major characteristics of the architectural design students were an emphasis on the inner world, inner-directedness, and a development of the self, and of the engineering design students being receptive to the environment, and demanding from oneself despite potential difficulties. The findings provide insights for intervention programs targeted at improving architectural and engineering design education.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 493
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Architectural/Urban design and its relation to engineering design
    Monnai, Teruyuki
    [J]. Seimitsu Kogaku Kaishi/Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, 2011, 77 (11): : 1003 - 1007
  • [32] IMPLICATIONS OF PRODUCT LIABILITY FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN AND EDUCATION
    CHRISTENSEN, JM
    [J]. ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 1977, 68 (03): : 274 - 277
  • [33] DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTIONS OF DESIGN AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION
    Petersen, Rikke Premer
    [J]. DESIGN FOR HARMONIES, VOL 8: DESIGN EDUCATION, 2013,
  • [34] CONCURRENT DESIGN IMPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERING-EDUCATION
    KELLY, MJ
    [J]. ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE : PEOPLE MAKE THE DIFFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 1989, : A213 - B213
  • [35] Approaches to the use of blended learning in teaching tectonics of design to architecture/design and architectural engineering students
    Shannon, Susan J.
    Francis, Rebecca L.
    Chooi, Yee Leng
    Ng, Sher Lynn
    [J]. ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2013, 56 (02) : 131 - 140
  • [36] Work in Progress: Creativity, Mindset, and Implications for Engineering Design Instruction
    Donohue, Susan K.
    Hunter, Whitney G. S.
    Richards, Larry G.
    [J]. 2012 FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2012,
  • [37] Stimulating Students' Design Creativity
    Scott, Ron
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 1990, 1 (03) : 279 - 288
  • [38] Architectural Design Teaching and Cultivation of Students' Design Capability
    Ouyang, Fang-xin
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE (HSC 2016), 2016, : 27 - 29
  • [39] Implementing a Blended Design Studio Model in Architectural Engineering Education
    Milosevic, Jelena
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2021, 37 (05) : 1300 - 1312
  • [40] Teaching Design Freedom: Understanding the Effects of Variations in Design for Additive Manufacturing Education on Students' Creativity
    Prabhu, Rohan
    Miller, Scarlett R.
    Simpson, Timothy W.
    Meisel, Nicholas A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2020, 142 (09)