SCALES OF ANALYSIS: THE USAGE OF APPROPRIATE MAGNIFICATION IN USE-WEAR STUDIES

被引:2
|
作者
Bradfield, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Johannesburg, Palaeo Res Inst, Johannesburg, South Africa
来源
ARHEOLOGIA | 2022年 / 03期
关键词
use-wear; microscopy; scales of analysis; magnification; texture analysis; BONE TOOLS; STONE TOOLS; MICROWEAR; QUANTIFICATION; ARTIFACTS; IDENTIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; TRACES; POLISH;
D O I
10.15407/arheologia2022.03.005
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
The interpretative potential of microscopic use-wear polishes is a factor of the scale of analysis. Observational surface area decreases in inverse proportion to magnification. In this paper I present the results of polishes on bone tools that have developed from fricative contact with nine different materials. Microwear polish is viewed at five different magnifications. I show that 50x.200x magnification, or observational areas of 0.4.2.0 mm(2), is the most appropriate scale of analysis of use-wear polishes regardless of whether one is conducting morphological identifications or relying on surface texture analysis software. The images presented here are meant to serve as an online reference collection to allow use-wear analysts to visualise how polish appearances change at different levels of magnification.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 16
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Archaeological Study of Lithic Use-wear Experiments
    Dennell, Robin
    LITHIC TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 34 (01) : 63 - 67
  • [42] The mineralogy and structure of use-wear polish on chert
    Patrick Schmidt
    Alice Rodriguez
    Kaushik Yanamandra
    Rakesh K. Behera
    Radu Iovita
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [43] Surface roughness as a quantitative approach to use-wear on macrolithic tools: A comparative analysis
    Delgado-Raack, Selina
    de Tobaruela, Jorge Menasanch
    Bettinardi, Italo
    Soldevilla, Jose Antonio
    Risch, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE-REPORTS, 2022, 46
  • [44] MICRODENTICULATES OF THE FUNNEL BEAKER CULTURE LITHIC ATTRIBUTE ANALYSIS, USE-WEAR ANALYSIS, AND CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS
    Hogberg, Anders
    ACTA ARCHAEOLOGICA, 2016, 87 (01) : 11 - 32
  • [45] Settling the argument: The contribution of use-wear studies to understanding artefact scatters in Neolithic Britain
    Chan, Ben
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE-REPORTS, 2024, 57
  • [46] A comparative assessment of texture analysis techniques applied to bone tool use-wear
    Watson, Adam S.
    Gleason, Matthew A.
    SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY-METROLOGY AND PROPERTIES, 2016, 4 (02):
  • [47] Use-wear evidence for the use of threshing sledges in Neolithic Greece
    Mazzucco, N.
    Ibanez, J. J.
    Anderson, P.
    Kotsakis, K.
    Kita, A.
    Adaktylou, F.
    Gibaja, J. F.
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE-REPORTS, 2024, 56
  • [48] The Roots of Use-Wear Analysis: Selected Papers of S. A. Semenov
    Odell, George H.
    LITHIC TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 31 (02) : 152 - 154
  • [49] Editorial paper special issue "Contact materials: The 'Other' in experimental use-wear studies"
    Marreiros, Joao
    Thaler, Ulrich
    Macdonald, Danielle A.
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE-REPORTS, 2023, 51
  • [50] The quantification of use-wear polish using image analysis.: First results
    González-Urquijo, JE
    Ibáñez-Estévez, JJ
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 30 (04) : 481 - 489