What has the National Cancer Database taught us about oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma?

被引:4
|
作者
Graillon, N. [1 ,2 ]
Iocca, O. [3 ]
Carey, R. M. [4 ]
Benjamin, K. [5 ]
Cannady, S. B. [4 ]
Hartner, L. [6 ]
Newman, J. G. [4 ]
Rajasekaran, K. [4 ]
Brant, J. A. [4 ]
Shanti, R. M. [4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] CHU Conception, AP HM, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Marseille, France
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, IFSTTAR, LBA UMR T24, Marseille, France
[3] Univ Torino, Surg Sci Dept, Div Maxillofacial Surg, Turin, Italy
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Univ Penn, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
oral cavity squamous cell carcino-ma; oral cancer; database; socioeconomic status; prognostic factors; neck dissection; radiation therapy; LYMPH-NODE YIELD; SURVIVAL OUTCOMES; NECK; HEAD; ASSOCIATION; TONGUE; PATTERNS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2021.03.015
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The wealth of data in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) has allowed numerous studies investigating patient, disease, and treatment-related factors in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC); however, to date, no summation of these studies has been performed. The aim of this study was to provide a concise review of the NCDB studies on OCSCC, with the hopes of providing a framework for future, novel studies aimed at enhancing our understanding of clinical parameters related to OCSCC. Two databases were searched, and 27 studies published between 2002 and 2020 were included. The average sample size was 13,776 patients (range 356- 50,896 patients). Four areas of research focus were identified: demographic and socioeconomic status, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. This review highlights the impact of age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on the prognosis and management of OCSCC, describes the prognostic factors, and details the modalities and indications for neck dissection and adjuvant therapy in OCSCC. In conclusion, the NCDB is a very valuable resource for clinicians and researchers involved in the management of OCSCC, offering an incomparable perspective on a large dataset of patients. Future developments regarding hospital information management, review of data accuracy and completeness, and wider accessibility will help clinicians to improve the care of patients affected by OCSCC.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 17
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What Has Dual Energy CT Taught Us About Gout?
    Ira Khanna
    Rebecca Pietro
    Yousaf Ali
    [J]. Current Rheumatology Reports, 2021, 23
  • [32] What Epilepsy & Behavior has taught us about the comorbidities of epilepsy
    Caplan, Rochelle
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2014, 41 : 39 - 39
  • [33] WHAT MOLECULAR-BIOLOGY HAS TAUGHT US ABOUT FIBRINOLYSIS
    WILHELM, OG
    BANG, NU
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE, 1992, 119 (02): : 111 - 115
  • [34] What has vision science taught us about functional MRI?
    Himmelberg, Marc M.
    Gardner, Justin L.
    Winawer, Jonathan
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2022, 261
  • [35] What the concept of VILI has taught us about ARDS management
    Didier Dreyfuss
    Rolf Hubmayr
    [J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 2016, 42 : 811 - 813
  • [36] What Qualitative Research has Taught us about Occupational Stress
    Mazzola, Joseph J.
    Schonfeld, Irvin Sam
    Spector, Paul E.
    [J]. STRESS AND HEALTH, 2011, 27 (02) : 93 - 110
  • [37] What Alzheimer disease has taught us about the nature of inflammation
    McGeer, PL
    [J]. GLIA, 2003, : 17 - 17
  • [38] What Has Dual Energy CT Taught Us About Gout?
    Khanna, Ira
    Pietro, Rebecca
    Ali, Yousaf
    [J]. CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 23 (09)
  • [39] What the concept of VILI has taught us about ARDS management
    Dreyfuss, Didier
    Hubmayr, Rolf
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 42 (05) : 811 - 813
  • [40] WHAT HAS MRI TAUGHT US ABOUT DIAGNOSIS AND OUTCOME IN OSTEOARTHRITIS?
    Arden, Nigel
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2011, 50 : 16 - 16