Induction ovens and electromagnetic interference: What is the risk for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators?

被引:19
|
作者
Binggeli, C
Rickli, H
Ammann, P
Brunckhorst, C
Hufschmid, U
Luechinger, R
Duru, F
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Div Cardiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Kantonsspital St Gallen, Div Cardiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Biomed Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
electromagnetic interference; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; pacing; induction oven;
D O I
10.1046/j.1540-8167.2005.40611.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Induction Ovens and ICDs. Electromagnetic fields may interfere with normal implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) function. Although the devices are effectively shielded and use exclusively bipolar leads, electromagnetic interference (EMI) remains a concern when patients are exposed to several household appliances. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential EMI risk of induction ovens, which are increasingly common in private households. In vitro measurements of an induction oven for private households GK 43 TI (V-Zug, Inc., Zug, Switzerland) showed that heating is regulated by increasing operating time from level 1 (100 ms/sec) to 5 (continuous operation). From levels 5 to 9 the magnetic field increases. Nineteen patients with left-sided implants of single- and dual-chamber ICD systems (8 Medtronic, 7 Guidant, and 4 St. Jude Medical) (18 males, 1 female), age (mean +/- SEM) 58 +/- 3 years, were included in this study. All patients were examined in standing position, bent over the cooking pot (minimal distance to the induction coil 25 cm), and with the cooking pot put eccentrically over the induction field at three different cooking levels (level 2, 5, and 9). The tests were repeated touching the cooking pot with one hand. Ventricular sensitivity was left unchanged. Ventricular tachycardia therapies were turned off in Medtronic and Guidant devices and ventricular sensing was continuously monitored in St. Jude Medical devices during testing. Interrogation of the devices after exposure did not show any inappropriate tachycardia detection, oversensing, or reprogramming. In conclusion, ICD patients can be reassured that EMI is unlikely to affect their devices if induction ovens are used in their kitchens.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 401
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Incidence of electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Kolb, C
    Zrenner, B
    Schmitt, C
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 24 (04): : 465 - 468
  • [2] Induction ovens and electromagnetic interference: What is the risk for patients with implanted pacemakers?
    Rickli, H
    Facchini, M
    Brunner, H
    Ammann, P
    Sagmeister, M
    Klaus, G
    Angehrn, W
    Luechinger, R
    Duru, F
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 26 (07): : 1494 - 1497
  • [3] Intraoperative Electrosurgical Electromagnetic Interference in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators Is It Safe?
    Rooke, G. Alec
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 130 (04) : 523 - 525
  • [4] Electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: present but rare
    Gesa von Olshausen
    Ina-Christine Rondak
    Carsten Lennerz
    Verena Semmler
    Christian Grebmer
    Tilko Reents
    Sonia Ammar-Busch
    Alessandra Buiatti
    Felix Bourier
    Isabel Deisenhofer
    Christof Kolb
    [J]. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2016, 105 : 657 - 665
  • [5] Electromagnetic interference of dental equipment with implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    de Sant'Anna Dadalti, Manoela Teixeira
    Ledo Alves da Cunha, Antonio Jose
    Pimenta de Araujo, Marcos Cesar
    Belo de Moraes, Luis Gustavo
    Risso, Patricia de Andrade
    [J]. ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 75 (08) : 584 - 587
  • [6] Electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: present but rare
    von Olshausen, Gesa
    Rondak, Ina-Christine
    Lennerz, Carsten
    Semmler, Verena
    Grebmer, Christian
    Reents, Tilko
    Ammar-Busch, Sonia
    Buiatti, Alessandra
    Bourier, Felix
    Deisenhofer, Isabel
    Kolb, Christof
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 105 (08) : 657 - 665
  • [7] Low risk of electromagnetic interference between smartphones and contemporary implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Burri, Haran
    Engkolo, Louis Paulin Mondouagne
    Dayal, Nicolas
    Etemadi, Abdul
    Makhlouf, Anne-Marie
    Stettler, Carine
    Trentaz, Florence
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2016, 18 (05): : 726 - 731
  • [8] Correction to: Electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: present but rare
    Gesa von Olshausen
    Ina-Christine Rondak
    Carsten Lennerz
    Verena Semmler
    Christian Grebmer
    Tilko Reents
    Sonia Ammar-Busch
    Alessandra Buiatti
    Felix Bourier
    Isabel Deisenhofer
    Christof Kolb
    [J]. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2020, 109 : 652 - 652
  • [9] In vitro tests of electromagnetic interference of electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy to implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Magnani, Andrea
    Matheoud, Roberta
    Brambilla, Marco
    Valzano, Serena
    Occhetta, Eraldo
    Marino, Paolo
    Balbo, Piero
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2012, 14 (07): : 1054 - 1059
  • [10] Electromagnetic Interference with Protocolized Electrosurgery Dispersive Electrode Positioning in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
    Schulman, Peter M.
    Treggiari, Miriam M.
    Yanez, N. David
    Henrikson, Charles A.
    Jessel, Peter M.
    Dewland, Thomas A.
    Merkel, Matthias J.
    Sera, Valerie
    Harukuni, Izumi
    Anderson, Ryan B.
    Kahl, Ed
    Bingham, Ann
    Alkayed, Nabil
    Stecker, Eric C.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 130 (04) : 530 - 540