Fish community assessment with eDNA metabarcoding: effects of sampling design and bioinformatic filtering

被引:110
|
作者
Evans, Nathan T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Yiyuan [1 ,2 ]
Renshaw, Mark A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Olds, Brett P. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Deiner, Kristy [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Turner, Cameron R. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Jerde, Christopher L. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Lodge, David M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Lamberti, Gary A. [1 ,2 ]
Pfrender, Michael E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Biol Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Environm Change Initiat, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Southeast Environm Res Ctr, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[4] Hawaii Pacific Univ, Ocean Inst, Shrimp Dept, Waimanalo, HI USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ithaca, NY USA
[6] Atkinson Ctr Sustainable Future, Ithaca, NY USA
[7] EcoSyst Genet LLC, South Bend, IN USA
[8] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Marine Sci Inst, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; BIODIVERSITY; RICHNESS; CONSERVATION; SIMILARITY; DIVERSITY; SEARCH; TOOL;
D O I
10.1139/cjfas-2016-0306
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Species richness is a metric of biodiversity that represents the number of species present in a community. Traditional fisheries assessments that rely on capture of organisms often underestimate true species richness. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an alternative tool that infers species richness by collecting and sequencing DNA present in the ecosystem. Our objective was to determine how spatial distribution of samples and "bioinformatic stringency" affected eDNA-metabarcoding estimates of species richness compared with capture-based estimates in a 2.2 ha reservoir. When bioinformatic criteria required species to be detected only in a single sample, eDNA metabarcoding detected all species captured with traditional methods plus an additional 11 noncaptured species. However, when we required species to be detected with multiple markers and in multiple samples, eDNA metabarcoding detected only seven of the captured species. Our analysis of the spatial patterns of species detection indicated that eDNA was distributed relatively homogeneously throughout the reservoir, except near the inflowing stream. We suggest that interpretation of eDNA metabarcoding data must consider the potential effects of water body type, spatial resolution, and bioinformatic stringency.
引用
收藏
页码:1362 / 1374
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cage transplant experiment shows weak transport effect on relative abundance of fish community composition as revealed by eDNA metabarcoding
    Laporte, M.
    Berger, C. S.
    Garcia-Machado, E.
    Cote, G.
    Morissette, O.
    Bernatchez, L.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 137
  • [32] Effects of sampling seasons and locations on fish environmental DNA metabarcoding in dam reservoirs
    Hayami, Kana
    Sakata, Masayuki K.
    Inagawa, Takashi
    Okitsu, Jiro
    Katano, Izumi
    Doi, Hideyuki
    Nakai, Katsuki
    Ichiyanagi, Hidetaka
    Gotoh, Ryo O.
    Miya, Masaki
    Sato, Hirotoshi
    Yamanaka, Hiroki
    Minamoto, Toshifumi
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 10 (12): : 5354 - 5367
  • [33] Similarities and Differences in Fish Community Composition Accessed by Electrofishing, Gill Netting, Seining, Trawling, and Water eDNA Metabarcoding in Temperate Reservoirs
    Golpour, Amin
    Smejkal, Marek
    Cech, Martin
    dos Santos, Romulo A.
    Souza, Allan T.
    Juza, Tomas
    Martinez, Carlos
    Barton, Daniel
    Vasek, Mojmir
    Drastik, Vladislav
    Kolarik, Tomas
    Kocvara, Lubos
    Riha, Milan
    Peterka, Jiri
    Blabolil, Petr
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 10
  • [34] eDNA metabarcoding in lakes to quantify influences of landscape features and human activity on aquatic invasive species prevalence and fish community diversity
    Pukk, Lilian
    Kanefsky, Jeannette
    Heathman, Amanda L.
    Weise, Ellen M.
    Nathan, Lucas R.
    Herbst, Seth J.
    Sard, Nicholas M.
    Scribner, Kim T.
    Robinson, John D.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2021, 27 (10) : 2016 - 2031
  • [35] Meta-analysis shows both congruence and complementarity of DNA and eDNA metabarcoding to traditional methods for biological community assessment
    Keck, Francois
    Blackman, Rosetta C.
    Bossart, Raphael
    Brantschen, Jeanine
    Couton, Marjorie
    Hurlemann, Samuel
    Kirschner, Dominik
    Locher, Nadine
    Zhang, Heng
    Altermatt, Florian
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2022, 31 (06) : 1820 - 1835
  • [36] A comparison of eDNA sampling methods in an estuarine environment on presence of longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) and fish community composition
    Bowen, Lizabeth
    Waters, Shannon
    Rankin, Lyndsay
    Thorne, Karen
    Gille, Daphne
    de la Cruz, Susan
    Woo, Isa
    Lewis, Levi
    Karpenko, Katie
    Dean, Cheryl
    Schumer, Gregg
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2024, 6 (03):
  • [37] Nearshore fish diversity changes with sampling method and human disturbance: Comparing eDNA metabarcoding and seine netting along the Upper St. Lawrence River
    Maracle, Stafford Rohtehra kwas
    Tournayre, Orianne
    Windle, Matthew J. S.
    Cormier, Emily
    Schwartz, Kate
    Wylie-Arbic, Mackenzie
    Rundle, Evan
    Perron, Mary Ann
    Francis, Abraham
    Lougheed, Stephen C.
    JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2024, 50 (03)
  • [38] Maximizing sampling efficiency to detect differences in fish community composition using environmental DNA metabarcoding in subarctic fjords
    Guri, Gledis
    Westgaard, Jon-Ivar
    Yoccoz, Nigel
    Wangensteen, Owen S.
    Praebel, Kim
    Ray, Jessica Louise
    Kelly, Ryan P.
    Shelton, Andrew Olaf
    Hanebrekke, Tanja
    Johansen, Torild
    ENVIRONMENTAL DNA, 2024, 6 (01):
  • [39] Quantitative assessment of fish larvae community composition in spawning areas using metabarcoding of bulk samples
    Ratcliffe, Frances C.
    Uren Webster, Tamsyn M.
    Rodriguez-Barreto, Deiene
    O'Rorke, Richard
    Garcia de Leaniz, Carlos
    Consuegra, Sofia
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2021, 31 (03)
  • [40] Effect of sampling design on estimation of phylogenetic diversity metrics of fish community
    Wang, Jiao
    Xu, Binduo
    Zhang, Chongliang
    Ji, Yupeng
    Xue, Ying
    Ren, Yiping
    Chen, Yong
    OECOLOGIA, 2023, 201 (01) : 129 - 141