Fish community assessment with eDNA metabarcoding: effects of sampling design and bioinformatic filtering

被引:110
|
作者
Evans, Nathan T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Yiyuan [1 ,2 ]
Renshaw, Mark A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Olds, Brett P. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Deiner, Kristy [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Turner, Cameron R. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Jerde, Christopher L. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Lodge, David M. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Lamberti, Gary A. [1 ,2 ]
Pfrender, Michael E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Biol Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Environm Change Initiat, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Southeast Environm Res Ctr, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[4] Hawaii Pacific Univ, Ocean Inst, Shrimp Dept, Waimanalo, HI USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ithaca, NY USA
[6] Atkinson Ctr Sustainable Future, Ithaca, NY USA
[7] EcoSyst Genet LLC, South Bend, IN USA
[8] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Marine Sci Inst, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; BIODIVERSITY; RICHNESS; CONSERVATION; SIMILARITY; DIVERSITY; SEARCH; TOOL;
D O I
10.1139/cjfas-2016-0306
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Species richness is a metric of biodiversity that represents the number of species present in a community. Traditional fisheries assessments that rely on capture of organisms often underestimate true species richness. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is an alternative tool that infers species richness by collecting and sequencing DNA present in the ecosystem. Our objective was to determine how spatial distribution of samples and "bioinformatic stringency" affected eDNA-metabarcoding estimates of species richness compared with capture-based estimates in a 2.2 ha reservoir. When bioinformatic criteria required species to be detected only in a single sample, eDNA metabarcoding detected all species captured with traditional methods plus an additional 11 noncaptured species. However, when we required species to be detected with multiple markers and in multiple samples, eDNA metabarcoding detected only seven of the captured species. Our analysis of the spatial patterns of species detection indicated that eDNA was distributed relatively homogeneously throughout the reservoir, except near the inflowing stream. We suggest that interpretation of eDNA metabarcoding data must consider the potential effects of water body type, spatial resolution, and bioinformatic stringency.
引用
收藏
页码:1362 / 1374
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fish community monitoring in floodplain lakes: eDNA metabarcoding and traditional sampling revealed inconsistent fish community composition
    He, Yiwei
    Zhao, Xianfu
    Shi, Chenxi
    Peng, Keyang
    Wang, Zhe
    Jiang, Zhongguan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 166
  • [2] The effects of spatial and temporal replicate sampling on eDNA metabarcoding
    Beentjes, Kevin K.
    Speksnijder, Arjen G. C. L.
    Schilthuizen, Menno
    Hoogeveen, Marten
    van der Hoorn, Berry B.
    PEERJ, 2019, 7
  • [3] Assessing riverine fish community diversity and stability by eDNA metabarcoding
    Gu, Songsong
    Deng, Ye
    Wang, Pengyuan
    Li, Chenhong
    Shi, Dejun
    Wang, Shuping
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 157
  • [4] eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants
    Norgaard, Louise
    Olesen, Carsten Riis
    Trojelsgaard, Kristian
    Pertoldi, Cino
    Nielsen, Jeppe Lund
    Taberlet, Pierre
    Ruiz-Gonzalez, Aritz
    De Barba, Marta
    Iacolina, Laura
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [5] eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants
    Louise Nørgaard
    Carsten Riis Olesen
    Kristian Trøjelsgaard
    Cino Pertoldi
    Jeppe Lund Nielsen
    Pierre Taberlet
    Aritz Ruiz-González
    Marta De Barba
    Laura Iacolina
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [6] Combined use of eDNA metabarcoding and video surveillance for the assessment of fish biodiversity
    Stat, Michael
    John, Jeffrey
    DiBattista, Joseph D.
    Newman, Stephen J.
    Bunce, Michael
    Harvey, Euan S.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (01) : 196 - 205
  • [7] A Comparative Evaluation of eDNA Metabarcoding Primers in Fish Community Monitoring in the East Lake
    Li, Yiwen
    Tang, Minzhe
    Lu, Suxiang
    Zhang, Xiaochun
    Fang, Chengchi
    Tan, Li
    Xiong, Fan
    Zeng, Honghui
    He, Shunping
    WATER, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [8] Environmental biomonitoring of reef fish community structure with eDNA metabarcoding in the Coral Triangle
    Gelis, Ester Restiana Endang
    Kamal, M. Mukhlis
    Subhan, Beginer
    Bachtiar, Imam
    Sani, Lalu M. Iqbal
    Madduppa, Hawis
    ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 2021, 104 (08) : 887 - 903
  • [9] Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring
    Ruan, Hui-Ting
    Wang, Rui-Li
    Li, Hong-Ting
    Liu, Li
    Kuang, Tian-Xu
    Li, Min
    Zou, Ke-Shu
    ZOOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 43 (02) : 192 - 204
  • [10] Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring
    Hui-Ting Ruan
    Rui-Li Wang
    Hong-Ting Li
    Li Liu
    Tian-Xu Kuang
    Min Li
    Ke-Shu Zou
    Zoological Research, 2022, (02) : 192 - 204