Peeking strategy for online news diffusion prediction via machine learning

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Yaotian [1 ]
Feng, Mingming [2 ]
Shang, Ke-ke [1 ]
Ran, Yijun [3 ]
Wang, Cheng-Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Journalism & Commun, Computat Commun Collaboratory, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Sch Journalism, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
News diffusion; Tree-like network; Peeking strategy; Cascade structure; REAL-TIME; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2022.127357
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
For computational social scientists, cascade size prediction and fake news detection are two primary problems in news diffusion or computational communication research. Previous studies predict news diffusion via peeking the social process (temporal structure) data in the initial stage, which is summarized as Peeking strategy. However, the accuracy of Peeking strategy for cascade size prediction still should be improved, and the advantage or limitation of Peeking strategy for fake news detection has not been fully investigated. To predict cascade size and detect fake news, we adopt Peeking strategy based on well-known machine learning algorithms. Our results show that Peeking strategy can effectively improve the accuracy of cascade size prediction. Meanwhile, we can peek into a smaller time window to achieve a higher performance in predicting the cascade size compared with previous methods. Nevertheless, we find that Peeking strategy with network structures fails in significantly improving the performance of fake news detection. Finally, we argue that cascade structure properties can aid in prediction of cascade size, but not for the fake news detection. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIs
    Tramer, Florian
    Zhang, Fan
    Juels, Ari
    Reiter, Michael K.
    Ristenpart, Thomas
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH USENIX SECURITY SYMPOSIUM, 2016, : 601 - 618
  • [32] Gas turbine performance prediction via machine learning
    Liu, Zuming
    Karimi, Iftekhar A.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 192
  • [33] Reversible watermarking via extreme learning machine prediction
    Feng, Guorui
    Qian, Zhenxing
    Dai, Ningjie
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2012, 82 : 62 - 68
  • [34] Claim Frequency Modeling and Prediction via Machine Learning
    Zeng Yuzhe
    Wu Aibo
    Zheng Hongyuan
    Luo Laijuan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 CHINA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, : 594 - 616
  • [35] Hepatic toxicity prediction of bisphenol analogs by machine learning strategy
    Zhao, Ying
    Zhang, Xueer
    Zhang, Zhendong
    Huang, Wenbo
    Tang, Min
    Du, Guizhen
    Qin, Yufeng
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 934
  • [36] Adaptive Online Sequential Extreme Learning Machine with Kernels for Online Ship Power Prediction
    Peng, Xiuyan
    Wang, Bo
    Zhang, Lanyong
    Su, Peng
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (17)
  • [37] Prediction of the Profitability of Pairs Trading Strategy Using Machine Learning
    Jirapongpan, Ronnachai
    Phumchusri, Naragain
    [J]. 2020 IEEE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA 2020), 2020, : 1025 - 1030
  • [38] A novel multimodal online news popularity prediction model based on ensemble learning
    Arora, Anuja
    Hassija, Vikas
    Bansal, Shivam
    Yadav, Siddharth
    Chamola, Vinay
    Hussain, Amir
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2023, 40 (08)
  • [39] BLINDFL: Vertical Federated Machine Learning without Peeking into Your Data
    Fu, Fangcheng
    Xue, Huanran
    Cheng, Yong
    Tao, Yangyu
    Cui, Bin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF DATA (SIGMOD '22), 2022, : 1316 - 1330
  • [40] Robust tracking via weighted online extreme learning machine
    Jing Zhang
    Huibing Wang
    Yonggong Ren
    [J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2019, 78 : 30723 - 30747