Integrating trust measures in multiagent systems

被引:55
|
作者
Rosaci, Domenico [1 ]
Sarne, Giuseppe M. L. [1 ]
Garruzzo, Salvatore [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mediterranea Reggio Calabria, DIMET, I-89122 Reggio Di Calabria, Italy
关键词
COMPUTATIONAL TRUST; REPUTATION;
D O I
10.1002/int.20513
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Several models have been proposed in the past for representing both reliability and reputation. However, we remark that a crucial point in the practical use of these two measures is represented by the possibility of suitably combining them to support the agent's decision. In the past, we proposed a reliabilityreputation model, called RRAF, that allows the user to choose how much importance to give to the reliability with respect to the reputation. However, RRAF shows some limitations, namely: (i) The weight to assign to the reliability versus reputation is arbitrarily set by the user, without considering the system evolution; (ii) the trust measure that an agent a perceives about an agent b is completely independent of the trust measure perceived by each other agent c, while in the reality the trust measures are mutually dependent. In this paper, we propose an extension of RRAF, aiming at facing the limitations above. In particular, we introduce a new trust reputation model, called TRR, that considers, from a mathematical viewpoint, the interdependence among all the trust measures computed in the systems. Moreover, this model dynamically computes a parameter measuring the importance of the reliability with respect to the reputation. Some experiments performed on the well-known ART(Agent Reputation and Trust) platform show the significant advantages in terms of effectiveness introduced by TRR with respect to RRAF. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trust-based role coordination in task-oriented multiagent systems
    Hermoso, Ramon
    Billhardt, Holger
    Ossowski, Sascha
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2013, 52 : 78 - 90
  • [32] Security Measures in Complex Multiagent Systems Composed from Mobile Agents
    Iantovics, Barna
    Crainicu, Bogdan
    [J]. COMPLEXITY IN ARTIFICIAL AND NATURAL SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 47 - 55
  • [33] Paving the way for implementing multiagent systems:: Integrating Gaia with agent-UML
    Garcia-Ojeda, Juan C.
    Arenas, Alvaro E.
    Perez-Alcazar, Jose de Jesus
    [J]. AGENT-ORIENTED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING VI, 2006, 3950 : 179 - 189
  • [34] Representing context for multiagent trust modeling
    Rehak, Martin
    Gregor, Milos
    Pechoucek, Michal
    Bradshaw, Jeffrey M.
    [J]. 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT AGENT TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 737 - 743
  • [35] The Semantic Interpretation of Trust in Multiagent Interactions
    Kalia, Anup K.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2014, : 3073 - 3074
  • [36] Multiagent Trust Region Policy Optimization
    Li, Hepeng
    He, Haibo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2024, 35 (09) : 12873 - 12887
  • [37] Process and materials flow integrating measures and weight systems
    Weinberg, H
    [J]. METALL, 1999, 53 (1-2): : 77 - 80
  • [38] Holonic multiagent systems: A foundation for the organisation of multiagent systems
    Fischer, K
    Schillo, M
    Siekmann, J
    [J]. HOLONIC AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS FOR MANUFACTURING, 2003, 2744 : 71 - 80
  • [39] An Adaptive Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence Based Trust Model in Multiagent Systems
    Wang, Ningkui
    Wei, Daijun
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (15):
  • [40] Heuristics-Based Trust Estimation in Multiagent Systems Using Temporal Difference Learning
    Rishwaraj, G.
    Ponnambalam, S. G.
    Loo, Chu Kiong
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2017, 47 (08) : 1925 - 1935