Integrating trust measures in multiagent systems

被引:55
|
作者
Rosaci, Domenico [1 ]
Sarne, Giuseppe M. L. [1 ]
Garruzzo, Salvatore [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mediterranea Reggio Calabria, DIMET, I-89122 Reggio Di Calabria, Italy
关键词
COMPUTATIONAL TRUST; REPUTATION;
D O I
10.1002/int.20513
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Several models have been proposed in the past for representing both reliability and reputation. However, we remark that a crucial point in the practical use of these two measures is represented by the possibility of suitably combining them to support the agent's decision. In the past, we proposed a reliabilityreputation model, called RRAF, that allows the user to choose how much importance to give to the reliability with respect to the reputation. However, RRAF shows some limitations, namely: (i) The weight to assign to the reliability versus reputation is arbitrarily set by the user, without considering the system evolution; (ii) the trust measure that an agent a perceives about an agent b is completely independent of the trust measure perceived by each other agent c, while in the reality the trust measures are mutually dependent. In this paper, we propose an extension of RRAF, aiming at facing the limitations above. In particular, we introduce a new trust reputation model, called TRR, that considers, from a mathematical viewpoint, the interdependence among all the trust measures computed in the systems. Moreover, this model dynamically computes a parameter measuring the importance of the reliability with respect to the reputation. Some experiments performed on the well-known ART(Agent Reputation and Trust) platform show the significant advantages in terms of effectiveness introduced by TRR with respect to RRAF. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trust in communication and multiagent systems
    Grana, Manuel
    Agreda, Adrian
    [J]. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2012, 243 : 816 - 822
  • [2] Value centric trust in multiagent systems
    Carter, J
    Ghorbani, AA
    [J]. IEEE/WIC INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 3 - 9
  • [3] Formal Trust Model for Multiagent Systems
    Wang, Yonghong
    Singh, Munindar P.
    [J]. 20TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2007, : 1551 - 1556
  • [4] Adding security and trust to multiagent systems
    Wong, HC
    Sycara, K
    [J]. APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 14 (09) : 927 - 941
  • [5] Trust and Reputation Models for Multiagent Systems
    Granatyr, Jones
    Botelho, Vanderson
    Lessing, Otto Robert
    Scalabrin, Edson Emilio
    Barthes, Jean-Paul
    Enembreck, Fabricio
    [J]. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2015, 48 (02)
  • [6] Normative multiagent systems and trust dynamics
    Boella, G
    van der Torre, L
    [J]. TRUSTING AGENTS FOR TRUSTING ELECTRONIC SOCIETIES: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS IN HCI AND E-COMMERCE, 2005, 3577 : 1 - 17
  • [7] Integrating Multiagent Systems into Virtual Worlds
    McClure, Grant
    Virwaney, Sandeep
    Lin, Fuhua
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY (ICMT-13), 2013, 84 : 581 - 588
  • [8] Integrating Multicamera Surveillance Systems into Multiagent Location Systems
    Luis Guerrero, Jose
    Berlanga, Antonio
    Molina, Jose M.
    [J]. USER-CENTRIC TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2011, 94 : 1 - 9
  • [9] Quantitative measures of organization for multiagent systems
    Krivov, S
    Ulanowicz, RE
    Dahiya, A
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS, 2003, 69 (01) : 39 - 54
  • [10] The Effects of Local Trust Cooperation in Multiagent Systems
    Schmidt, Thomas
    Eberling, Markus
    Buening, Hans Kleine
    [J]. AGENT AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS: TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS, PT I, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 6070 : 233 - 242