Participatory methods in energy system modelling and planning-A review

被引:33
|
作者
McGookin, Connor [1 ,2 ]
Gallachoir, Brian O. [1 ,2 ]
Byrne, Edmond [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Engn, Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Cork, Environm Res Inst, MaREI Ctr, Cork, Ireland
来源
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Participatory; Transdisciplinary; Energy system modelling; Energy planning; Energy scenarios; LOW-CARBON SCENARIOS; DECISION-SUPPORT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; TRANSITIONS; PERCEPTIONS; FRAMEWORK; CHALLENGES; APPRAISAL; FUTURES; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2021.111504
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a systematic review of participatory methods used in energy system modelling and planning. It draws on a compiled database of fifty-nine studies at a local, regional, and national level detailing analysis on full energy systems down to sectors, modes, and single technologies. The initial aim of the paper is to consolidate and present this growing body of literature, providing a clear understanding of which stakeholder groups have been engaged and what methods have been used to link stakeholder engagement with quantitative analysis. On from this, the progress to date in democratising key decision-making processes is discussed, reflecting on the benefits and challenges of a participatory approach, as well as highlighting gaps within the current body of literature. During the review, two differing spatial levels at subnational (cities, municipalities, or regions) and national scale emerged as separate groups for analysis. A clear distinction between the two groups was the motivation for involving stakeholders. At a subnational level, researchers hoping to build local capacity to bring about real-world change engaged with community representatives, whereas national level studies concerned with generating more impactful energy policy measures involved industry, policymaking, and academic experts. One key finding from the review was that only ten out of the fifty-nine studies reviewed noted some form of collaboration with non-academic stakeholders, and moreover 36% of studies involved just a single interaction with participants. This indicates a lack of progress to date in process democratisation within energy system modelling and planning research.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematically reviewing the use of participatory methods in energy system modelling and planning literature
    McGookin, Connor
    Gallachoir, Brian O.
    Byrne, Edmond
    [J]. METHODSX, 2022, 9
  • [2] Developing a Participatory Planning Support System for Sustainable Regional Planning-A Problem Structuring Case Study
    Aspen, Dina Margrethe
    Amundsen, Andreas
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [3] SAR Features and Techniques for Urban Planning-A Review
    Koukiou, Georgia
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (11)
  • [4] An Integrated Framework of Green Stormwater Infrastructure Planning-A Review
    Lu, Gang
    Wang, Lin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [5] Stakeholder inclusion in scenario planning-A review of European projects
    Andersen, Per Dannemand
    Hansen, Meiken
    Selin, Cynthia
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 169
  • [6] Risk-based methods for sustainable energy system planning: A review
    Ioannou, Anastasia
    Angus, Andrew
    Brennan, Feargal
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 74 : 602 - 615
  • [7] AI in Orthodontics: Revolutionizing Diagnostics and Treatment Planning-A Comprehensive Review
    Kazimierczak, Natalia
    Kazimierczak, Wojciech
    Serafin, Zbigniew
    Nowicki, Pawel
    Nozewski, Jakub
    Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [8] How threats inform conservation planning-A systematic review protocol
    Virtanen, Elina A.
    Soderholm, Maria
    Moilanen, Atte
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (05):
  • [9] A participatory exploratory modelling approach for long-term planning in energy transitions
    Moallemi, Enayat A.
    Malekpour, Shirin
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 35 : 205 - 216