Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure

被引:9
|
作者
Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Valentina [1 ,2 ]
Guyer, Jelena [3 ,4 ]
Luethi, Nora [5 ,6 ]
Sobanski, Piotr [7 ,8 ]
Zbinden, Rut [4 ]
Rodriguez, Eveline [9 ]
Hunziker, Lukas [10 ]
Eychmuller, Steffen [5 ]
Maessen, Maud [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Social & Prevent Med ISPM, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Grad Sch Hlth Sci, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Spital Emmental, Dept Gen Surg, Burgdorf, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bern, Fac Med, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Bern, Univ Hosp Bern, Univ Ctr Palliat Care, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
[6] Univ Bern, Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Emergency Med, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
[7] Spital Schwyz, Palliat Care Unit, Schwyz, Switzerland
[8] Spital Schwyz, Competence Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Schwyz, Switzerland
[9] Stiftung Langzeitpflege, Tilia Koniz, Koniz, Switzerland
[10] Inselspital Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Cardiol, Bern, Switzerland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Needs assessment; Heart failure; Palliative care; Patient-centered care; NAT; PD-HF; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PALLIATIVE CARE; AGREEMENT; PEOPLE; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; KAPPA;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-021-01817-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure (NAT: PD-HF) is a tool created to assess the needs of people living with heart failure and their informal caregivers to assist delivering care in a more comprehensive way that addresses actual needs that are unmet, and to improve quality of life. In this study, we aimed to (1) Translate the tool into German and culturally adapt it. (2) Assess internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability of the German NAT: PD-HF. (3) Evaluate whether and how patients and health care personnel understand the tool and its utility. (4) Assess the tool's face validity, applicability, relevance, and acceptability among health care personnel. Methods: Single-center validation study. The tool was translated from English into German using a forward-backward translation. To assess internal consistency, we used Cronbach's alpha. To assess inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability, we used Cohen's kappa, and to assess validity we used face validity. Results: The translated tool showed good internal consistency. Raters were in substantial agreement on a majority of the questions, and agreement was almost perfect for all the questions in the test-retest analysis. Face validity was rated high by health care personnel. Conclusion: The German NAT: PD-HF is a reliable, valid, and internally consistent tool that is well accepted by both patients and health care personnel. However, it is important to keep in mind that effective use of the tool requires training of health care personnel.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of the Persian version of the Compassionate Care Assessment Tool
    Aliakbar Vaisi-Raygani
    Asghar Dalvandi
    Kian Nourozi
    Abbas Ebadi
    Mahdi Rahgozar
    Rostam Jalali
    Nader Salari
    Alireza Abdi
    International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2021, 8 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [22] Validation of the Persian version of the Compassionate Care Assessment Tool
    Vaisi-Raygani, Aliakbar
    Dalvandi, Asghar
    Nourozi, Kian
    Ebadi, Abbas
    Rahgozar, Mahdi
    Jalali, Rostam
    Salari, Nader
    Abdi, Alireza
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2021, 8 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [23] Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool
    Schluessel, Sabine
    Halfter, Kathrin
    Haas, Carolin
    Kroenke, Kurt
    Lukaschek, Karoline
    Gensichen, Jochen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (15)
  • [24] Validation of the German version of the subarachnoid haemorrhage outcome tool (SAHOT)
    Ziebart, Andreas
    Abdulazim, Amr
    Wenz, Fabian
    Kleindienst, Nikolaus
    Mocarz-Kleindienst, Maria
    Galea, Ian
    Rinkel, Gabriel J. E.
    Etminan, Nima
    EUROPEAN STROKE JOURNAL, 2023, 8 (01) : 320 - 327
  • [25] Validation of a Chinese Version of the Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients (SNAP)
    Sharma, Rashmi
    Astrow, Alan
    Sulmasy, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2012, 43 (02) : 373 - 374
  • [26] Development of a German version of the Oral Health Assessment Tool
    Klotz, Anna-Luisa
    Zajac, Melania
    Ehret, Judith
    Hassel, Alexander Jochen
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    Zenthoefer, Andreas
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (01) : 165 - 172
  • [27] Development of a German version of the Oral Health Assessment Tool
    Anna-Luisa Klotz
    Melania Zajac
    Judith Ehret
    Alexander Jochen Hassel
    Peter Rammelsberg
    Andreas Zenthöfer
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2020, 32 : 165 - 172
  • [28] Validation and Revision of a German Version of the Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs Scale
    Neubauer, Andreas B.
    Voss, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 37 (01) : 56 - 72
  • [29] Validation of the Chinese version of the CogState computerised cognitive assessment battery in Taiwanese patients with heart failure
    Chou, Cheng-Chen
    Pressler, Susan J.
    Giordani, Bruno
    Fetzer, Susan Jane
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2015, 24 (21-22) : 3147 - 3154
  • [30] Psychometric Properties of the Needs Assessment Tool-Progressive Disease Cancer in UK Primary Care
    Allgar, Victoria L.
    Chen, Hong
    Richfield, Ed
    Currow, David
    Macleod, Una
    Johnson, Miriam J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 56 (04) : 602 - 612