Magnitude effects in lending and borrowing: empirical evidence from a P2P platform

被引:4
|
作者
Breuer, Wolfgang [1 ]
Soypak, Can K. [1 ]
Steininger, Bertram, I [2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Finance, Aachen, Germany
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Banking & Finance, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE | 2020年 / 26卷 / 09期
关键词
Discounting anomalies; magnitude effect; P2P platform; time preferences; INFORMATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/1351847X.2019.1709525
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
For varying borrowing and lending amounts, the corresponding subjective discount rates will also vary. A situation where high amounts correspond to lower discount rates is called a conventional magnitude effect, while the opposite is called a reverse magnitude effect. We present an overview of the theoretical arguments for both kinds of magnitude effects. Against this background, we then offer the first comprehensive empirical analysis of this issue based on real-life transaction data. To do so, we rely on more than 9,000 credit applications from the formerly largest German peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platform, Smava, between February 2007 and April 2013. We confirm that there is a conventional magnitude effect for lending money to others but a reverse magnitude effect for borrowing decisions. We suggest, as an explanation for our findings, the prevalence of cost-based determinants of magnitude effects in this special setting.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 873
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] P2P lending Platform's Pricing Competition Strategy
    Zhao, Xiao-nan
    [J]. MANAGEMENT 2016: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, DOMESTIC PARTICULARITIES AND EMERGING MARKETS IN THE LIGHT OF RESEARCH, 2016, : 351 - 357
  • [22] Study on Risks and Supervision of P2P Network Lending Platform
    Chen, Hong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT, EDUCATION AND INFORMATION (MEICI 2018), 2018, 163 : 391 - 395
  • [23] A decision support model for investment on P2P lending platform
    Zeng, Xiangxiang
    Liu, Li
    Leung, Stephen
    Du, Jiangze
    Wang, Xun
    Li, Tao
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [24] P2P Lending Platform Risk Research and Lead into Insurance
    Ju Ran
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 CHINA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 290 - 299
  • [25] Investor Sentiment and the Return Rate of P2P Lending Platform
    Wei Zhang
    Yingxiu Zhao
    Pengfei Wang
    Dehua Shen
    [J]. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 2020, 27 : 97 - 113
  • [26] Herding behavior in online P2P lending: An empirical investigation
    Lee, Eunkyoung
    Lee, Byungtae
    [J]. ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 11 (05) : 495 - 503
  • [27] Factors affecting platform default risk in online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending business: an empirical study using Chinese online P2P platform data
    Yoon, Yeujun
    Li, Yu
    Feng, Yan
    [J]. ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01) : 131 - 158
  • [28] Factors affecting platform default risk in online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending business: an empirical study using Chinese online P2P platform data
    Yeujun Yoon
    Yu Li
    Yan Feng
    [J]. Electronic Commerce Research, 2019, 19 : 131 - 158
  • [29] The Credit Risk of P2P Online Lending Platform: A Game Analysis
    Zhang, He
    [J]. 2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AND BUSINESS INNOVATION (ICMIBI 2017, 2017, 81 : 50 - 54
  • [30] Stability Analysis of Information Disclosure Game in a P2P Lending Platform
    Yang, Ke
    Yue, Kun
    Zhu, Heng
    Wu, Hong
    Liu, Weiyi
    [J]. 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (ICIM 2017), 2017, : 118 - 122