Reliability and validity of the French version of the Tobacco Craving Questionnaire

被引:14
|
作者
Berlin, I
Vorspan, F
Singleton, EG
Warot, D
Notides, C
Heishman, SJ
机构
[1] CHU Pitie Salpetriere, Serv Pharmacol, FR-75013 Paris, France
[2] Howard Univ, Ctr Drug Abuse Res, Washington, DC 20059 USA
[3] NIDA, NIH, DHHS, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
smokers; tobacco craving; self-report questionnaire; multidimensional;
D O I
10.1159/000083034
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: ( 1) To assess the factorial structure, reliability and validity of the French language version of the Tobacco Craving Questionnaire (TCQ), a multidimensional, self-report instrument evaluating tobacco craving, to allow its use in French-speaking populations. ( 2) To compare the two different language versions of the same instrument in 2 independent samples from 2 cultures in 2 distinct time periods. Methods: The French TCQ was administered to 226 current cigarette smokers after at least 2 h of abstinence. Results: Despite the substantial difference in population characteristics between the French and American samples of smokers, both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the French version was best described by a 4-factor solution, similar to the original English version. Reliability estimates were 0.83, 0.79, 0.69 and 0.66 for the French and 0.82, 0.70, 0.75 and 0.48 for the English version for 'emotionality' ( factor 1), 'expectancy' ( factor 2), 'compulsivity' ( factor 3) and ` purposefulness' ( factor 4), respectively. The 4 factors accounted for 11.6, 17.1, 9.0, and 9.5% of the total variance in emotionality, expectancy, compulsivity, and purposefulness, respectively, for the French compared to 14.2, 12.5, 14.4 and 5% of the total variance for the English version, respectively. Conclusion: The French version of the TCQ is as valid and reliable instrument as the original English version and assesses the same 4 dimensions of craving for tobacco. Copyright (C) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 68
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Moroccan version of the short Tobacco Craving Questionnaire (MTCQ-12)
    Bout, Amine
    Aarab, Chadya
    Aalouane, Rachid
    [J]. ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE, 2024, 50 (03): : 296 - 299
  • [22] Reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the brief version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders
    Alsaleh, Saad
    Alfallaj, Rayan
    Almousa, Hisham
    Alsubaie, Nawaf
    Akkielah, Yara
    Mesallam, Tamer A.
    Sumaily, Ibrahim
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 9 (03):
  • [23] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Parenting Concerns Questionnaire
    Yanai, Misa
    Aoyama, Maho
    Kosugi, Kazuhiro
    Tsumura, Akemi
    Nakanishi, Erika
    Miyashita, Mitsunori
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 54 (07) : 797 - 804
  • [24] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire
    Erdogan, Sengul
    Ucpunar, Habibe K.
    Cangoz Tavat, Banu
    [J]. TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2022, 33 (04) : 274 - 279
  • [25] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire
    Lin, Chuan-Ju
    Shiah, I-Shin
    Chu, Hsin
    Tsai, Pei-Shan
    Chen, Chiung-Hua
    Chang, Yue-Cune
    Chou, Kuei-Ru
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2011, 25 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [26] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
    S. Sarmer
    S. Ergin
    G. Yavuzer
    [J]. Rheumatology International, 2000, 20 : 9 - 12
  • [27] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
    Sar, Vedat
    Ozturk, Erdinc
    Ikikardes, Eda
    [J]. TURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2012, 32 (04): : 1054 - 1063
  • [28] The reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire
    Wittmann Victoria
    Csabai Marta
    Drotos Gergely
    Lazar Gyorgy
    [J]. ORVOSI HETILAP, 2018, 159 (47) : 1988 - 1993
  • [29] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Pain Disability Questionnaire
    Yoon, Jisun
    Choi, Kyoung Hyo
    Kim, Tae Woo
    Yang, Seo Yon
    Sim, Mi Kyung
    [J]. ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2013, 37 (06): : 814 - 823
  • [30] Reliability and validity of a Turkish version of Leicester cough questionnaire
    Gonen, Nazmiye Akis
    Havlucu, Yavuz
    Yorgancioglu, Arzu
    Goktalay, Tugba
    Coskun, Aysin Sakar
    Celik, Pinar
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2015, 46