Heuristic knowledge-based planning for single-isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery to multiple brain metastases

被引:22
|
作者
Ziemer, Benjamin P. [1 ]
Sanghvi, Parag [1 ]
Hattangadi-Gluth, Jona [1 ]
Moore, Kevin L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiat Med & Appl Sci, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
inverse treatment planning; knowledge-based planning; multiple metastases; stereotactic radiosurgery; RADIATION-THERAPY SBRT; OPTIC NERVES; GAMMA-KNIFE; QUALITY; CHIASM;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12479
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Single-isocenter, volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for multiple brain metastases (multimets) can deliver highly conformal dose distributions and reduce overall patient treatment time compared to other techniques. However, treatment planning for multimet cases is highly complex due to variability in numbers and sizes of brain metastases, as well as their relative proximity to organs-at-risk (OARs). The purpose of this study was to automate the VMAT planning of multimet cases through a knowledge-based planning (KBP) approach that adapts single-target SRS dose predictions to multiple target predictions. MethodsUsing a previously published artificial neural network (ANN) KBP system trained on single-target, linac-based SRS plans, 3D dose distribution predictions for multimet patients were obtained by treating each brain lesion as a solitary target and subsequently combining individual dose predictions into a single distribution. Spatial dose distributions d(i)((r) over right arrow) for each of the i = 1...N lesions were merged using the combination function d((r) over right arrow) = [Sigma(N)(i) d(i)(n) ((r) over right arrow)](1/n). The optimal value of n was determined by minimizing root-mean squared (RMS) difference between clinical multimet plans and predicted dose per unit length along the line profile joining each lesion in the clinical cohort. The gradient measure (GM = [3/4 pi](1/3) [V-50%(1/3) - V-100%(1/3)]) is the primary quality metric for SRS plan evaluation at our institution and served as the main comparative metric between clinical plans and the KBP results. A total of 41 previously treated multimet plans, with target numbers ranging from N = 2-10, were used to validate the ANN predictions and subsequent KBP auto-planning routine. Fully deliverable KBP plans were developed by converting predicted dose distribution into patient-specific optimization objectives for the clinical treatment planning system (TPS). Plan parity was maintained through identical arc configuration and target normalization. Overall plan quality improvements were quantified by calculating the difference between SRS quality metrics (QMs): Delta QM = QM(clinical)-QM(KBP). In addition to GM, investigated QMs were: volume of brain receiving > 10 Gy (V-10 (Gy)), volume of brain receiving >= 5 Gy (Delta V-5 (Gy)), heterogeneity index (HI), dose to 0.1cc of the brainstem (D-0.1 (cc)), dose to 1% of the optic chiasm (D-1%), and interlesion dose (D-IL). In addition to this quantitative analysis, overall plan quality was assessed via blinded plan comparison of the manual and KBP treatment plans by SRS-specializing physicians. Results: A dose combination factor of n = 8 yielded an integrated dose profile RMS difference of 2.9% across the 41-patient cohort. Multimet dose predictions exhibited Delta GM = 0.07 +/- 0.10 cm against the clinical sample, implying either further normal tissue sparing was possible or that dose predictions were slightly overestimating achievable dose gradients. The latter is the more likely explanation, as this bias vanished when dose predictions were converted to deliverable KBP plans Delta GM = 0.00 +/- 0.08 cm. Remaining QMs were nearly identical or showed modest improvements in the KBP sample. Equivalent QMs included: Delta V-10 (Gy) = 0.37 +/- 3.78 cc, Delta HI = 0.02 +/- 0.08 and Delta D-IL= -2.22 +/- 171.4 cGy. The KBP plans showed a greater degree of noCrmal tissue sparing as indicated by brain Delta V-5 (Gy) = 4.11 +/- 24.05 cc, brainstem Delta D-0.1 (cc) = 42.8 +/- 121.4 cGy, and chiasm Delta D-1% = 50.8 +/- 83.0 cGy. In blinded review by SRS-specializing physicians, KBP-generated plans were deemed equivalent or superior in 32/41(78.1%) of the cases. Conclusion: Heuristic KBP-driven automated planning in linac-based, single-isocenter treatments for multiple brain metastases maintained or exceeded overall plan quality. (C) 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:5001 / 5009
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Knowledge-Based Planning for Single-Isocenter Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases
    Ziemer, B.
    Shiraishi, S.
    Hattangadi-Gluth, J.
    Sanghvi, P.
    Moore, K.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3724 - 3725
  • [2] Knowledge-Based Stereotactic Planning for Single-Isocenter Multiple Brain Metastases
    Robar, J. L.
    MacDonald, R. L.
    Phillips, H.
    Spiessens, S.
    Thomas, C.
    Yewondwossen, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E641 - E642
  • [3] Stereotactic radiosurgery with single-isocenter dynamic arc therapy of multiple brain metastases
    Bodensohn, R.
    Kaempfel, A.
    Fleischmann, D. F.
    Hofmaier, J.
    Hadi, I.
    Garny, S.
    Reiner, M.
    Corradini, S.
    Forbrig, R.
    Thon, N.
    Belka, C.
    Niyazi, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S470 - S471
  • [4] Stereotactic radiotherapy with single-isocenter in multiple brain metastases
    Matteucci, P.
    Silipigni, S.
    Rinaldi, C. G.
    Ridolfi, I.
    Falco, P.
    Fiore, M.
    Ippolito, E.
    Ramella, S.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S866 - S867
  • [5] Effect of setup error in the single-isocenter technique on stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases
    Nakano, Hisashi
    Tanabe, Satoshi
    Utsunomiya, Satoru
    Yamada, Takumi
    Sasamoto, Ryuta
    Nakano, Toshimichi
    Saito, Hirotake
    Takizawa, Takeshi
    Sakai, Hironori
    Ohta, Atsushi
    Abe, Eisuke
    Kaidu, Motoki
    Aoyama, Hidefumi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (12): : 155 - 165
  • [6] Single-Isocenter Multitarget Stereotactic Radiosurgery Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases
    Palmer, Joshua D.
    Sebastian, Nikhil T.
    Chu, Jacquline
    DiCostanzo, Dominic
    Bell, Erica H.
    Grecula, John
    Arnett, Andrea
    Blakaj, Dukagjin M.
    McGregor, John
    Elder, James B.
    Lu, Lanchun
    Zoller, Wesley
    Addington, Mark
    Lonser, Russell
    Chakravarti, Arnab
    Brown, Paul D.
    Raval, Raju
    [J]. ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 5 (01) : 70 - 76
  • [7] Clinical Outcomes of Single-Isocenter Versus Multiple-Isocenter Stereotactic Radiosurgery Techniques for Multiple Brain Metastases
    Deng, J.
    Li, M. K.
    Savjani, R. R.
    Chu, F. I.
    Tenn, S. E.
    Lee, C.
    Agazaryan, N.
    Yang, I.
    Everson, R.
    Kim, W.
    Pouratian, N.
    Kishan, A. U.
    Chin, R. K.
    Steinberg, M. L.
    Kaprealian, T. B.
    Hegde, J. V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E566 - E567
  • [8] Single-Isocenter Multitarget Stereotactic Radiosurgery is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases
    Sebastian, N.
    Raval, R.
    Chu, J.
    DiCostanzo, D. J.
    Bell, E. H.
    Grecula, J. C.
    Arnett, A. L. H.
    Blakaj, D. M.
    McGregor, J.
    Elder, J. B.
    Lonser, R. R.
    Chakravarti, A.
    Brown, P. D.
    Palmer, J. D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E89 - E89
  • [9] Optimization of treatment isocenter location in single-isocenter LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for management of multiple brain metastases
    Cui, Taoran
    Zhou, Yongkang
    Yue, Ning J.
    Vergalasova, Irina
    Zhang, Yin
    Zhu, Jiahua
    Nie, Ke
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (12) : 7632 - 7640
  • [10] Single-Isocenter, Multi-Metastasis, Linear Accelerator-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery For Multiple Brain Metastases
    Deng, J.
    Parikh, N. R.
    Levin-Epstein, R.
    Li, M. K.
    Tenn, S. E.
    Lee, C.
    Agazaryan, N.
    Chu, F. I.
    Yang, I.
    Everson, R.
    Kim, W.
    Pouratian, N.
    Kishan, A. U.
    Chin, R. K.
    Steinberg, M. L.
    Kaprealian, T. B.
    Hegde, J. V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E671 - E671