Spatiotemporal Changes in Ecosystem Services Value and Its Driving Factors in the Karst Region of China

被引:8
|
作者
Yang, Liu [1 ]
Jiao, Hongzan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Guiyang 550025, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Sch Urban Design, Dept Urban Planning, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[3] Engn Res Ctr Human Settlements & Environm Hubei P, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ecosystem services value; driving factors; geographical detector model; multiscale geographically weighted regression; karst areas; GEOGRAPHICALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION; LAND-USE CHANGE; SPATIAL NONSTATIONARITY; LANDSCAPE PATTERN; URBANIZATION; IMPACT; AREAS; BIODIVERSITY; DEGRADATION; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3390/su14116695
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over the last few decades, most regional ecosystem services (ESs) have significantly deteriorated, primarily driven by an increase in human dominance over the natural environment. Creating an assessment framework of ESs and identifying its driving factors at the regional scale is challenging for researchers, administrators, and policy-makers. In this study, we attempt to quantify the economic value of ESs (ESV) in Guizhou Province from 2000 to 2018, one of the most prominent areas of karst landforms in China. We identified the major factors affecting ESs using the geographical detector (GD) model. Then, we conducted a multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) analysis to examine the spatial differentiation of the causal effects of both natural and anthropogenic factors on ESs. Our results demonstrate the following: (1) the total ESV of Guizhou Province was approximately USD 81,764.32 million in 2000, USD 82,411.06 million in 2010, and USD 82,065.31 million in 2018, and the increase of USD 300.99 million from 2000 to 2018 was the result of the remarkable conversion from cultivated land to forestland; (2) significantly considerable differentiation existed in the spatial distribution of ESV at the county level, with a higher value in the eastern region and a lower value in the western region; (3) among the driving factors, population density had a more significant effect on the spatial differentiation of ESV than did natural factors; and (4) agricultural output value was the dominant factor influencing the ESV during the study period, with a significantly positive correlation, whereas per capita GDP and population density had significantly negative impacts on ESV, according to the effective performance of the MGWR model that evaluated the spatial heterogeneity in geospatial relationships between the driving factors of ESV. Our findings can provide notable guidance to land administrators and policy-makers for effective land resource conservation and management plans, thereby improving regional sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spatiotemporal Changes and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Health in the Qinling-Daba Mountains
    Xiang, Ting
    Meng, Xiaoliang
    Wang, Xinshuang
    Xiong, Jing
    Xu, Zelin
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2022, 11 (12)
  • [42] Changes in multiple ecosystem services between 2000 and 2013 and their driving factors in the Grazing Withdrawal Program, China
    Zhang, Haiyan
    Fan, Jiangwen
    Cao, Wei
    Zhong, Huaping
    Harris, Warwick
    Gong, Guoli
    Zhang, Yaxian
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 116 : 67 - 79
  • [43] Spatiotemporal Changes in and Driving Factors of Potential Evapotranspiration in a Hyper-Arid Locale in the Hami Region, China
    Lu, Yuanbo
    Sun, Lingxiao
    Li, Chunlan
    He, Jing
    Guo, Zengkun
    Duan, Li
    Zhang, Jing
    Lupikasza, Ewa
    Malik, Ireneusz
    Wistuba, Malgorzata
    Yu, Yang
    Bonacci, Ognjen
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [44] Spatiotemporal variations and its driving factors of soil conservation services in the Three Gorges Reservoir area in China
    Li, Qi
    Kou, Xiaomei
    Niu, Le
    Xia, Xianli
    Xiao, Wenfa
    Zhu, Jianhua
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [45] Analysis of Spatial Distribution of Ecosystem Services and Driving Factors in Northeast China
    Wang, Jia-Qi
    Xing, Yan-Qiu
    Chang, Xiao-Qing
    Yang, Hong
    [J]. Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2024, 45 (09): : 5385 - 5394
  • [46] Scale effects and spatial heterogeneity of driving factors in ecosystem services value interactions within the Tibet autonomous region
    Liu, Jiamin
    Pei, Xiutong
    Liao, Bingzhi
    Zhang, Hengxi
    Liu, Wang
    Jiao, Jizong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 351
  • [47] Spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of ecosystem health and the synergetic impact of its driving factors in the Yangtze River Delta, China
    Xuepeng Zhang
    Peng Gou
    Wei Chen
    Guangchao Li
    Yingshuang Huang
    Tianyu Zhou
    Yang Liu
    Wei Nie
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 85184 - 85197
  • [48] Spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of ecosystem health and the synergetic impact of its driving factors in the Yangtze River Delta, China
    Zhang, Xuepeng
    Gou, Peng
    Chen, Wei
    Li, Guangchao
    Huang, Yingshuang
    Zhou, Tianyu
    Liu, Yang
    Nie, Wei
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (36) : 85184 - 85197
  • [49] Long-term changes of forest biomass and its driving factors in karst area, Guizhou, China
    Qian, Chunhua
    Qiang, Hequn
    Zhang, Guangming
    Li, Mingyang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORKS, 2021, 17 (08):
  • [50] Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Driving Force of Ecosystem Health in an Important Ecological Function Region in China
    Shen, Wei
    Zheng, Zhicheng
    Qin, Yaochen
    Li, Yang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (14) : 1 - 19