Role of MRI in diagnosis of prostate cancer and correlation of results with transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy "TRUS"

被引:4
|
作者
Ahmed, Islam Hussien Abd Elaziz [1 ]
Mohamed Ali Hassan, Hend Galal Eldeen [2 ,3 ]
Abo ElMaaty, Mohamed El Gharib [2 ]
ElDaisty El Metwally, Shaima El Metwally [2 ]
机构
[1] Sohag Univ, Fac Med, Sohag Oncol Inst, Sohag, Egypt
[2] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Radiodiag Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Galala Univ, Fac Appl Hlth Sci Technol, Technol Radiol & Med Imaging Program, Suez, Egypt
来源
关键词
Prostatic cancer; Transrectal ultrasound; MR spectroscopic imaging; T2-weighted; CLINICAL-VALUE; RESONANCE; COMBINATION; CARCINOMA; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; LOCALIZATION; PERFORMANCE; MEN;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-022-00755-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in elderly men, and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in developed countries. For a long time, TRUS is used in screening, diagnosis of prostate lesions. Recently the implementation of multi parametric MRI into a screening program currently seems to be the most promising technique to improve the early detection of prostate cancer. Results: Thirty Patients were referred from urological outpatient clinics complaining of urological symptoms (dysuria, frequency and urine retention). The study was carried, and the patients were submitted to Ultrasonography, conventional magnetic resonance, diffusion weighted images and MR spectroscopy techniques, these results were correlated with histopathological data. In this study Conventional MRI has moderate sensitivity 81.8% and low specificity 37.3% in diagnosing prostate malignancy. Using of mpMRI combination of diffusion-weighted, Dynamic contrast enhanced and MR spectroscopic imaging is a promising approach for discriminating between benign and malignant lesions in the PZ and increase sensitivity 100% and specificity 96.6% in diagnosing prostate malignancy. Conclusions: The standard for the definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer is trans-rectal ultrasound biopsy. However, TRUS guided biopsy has a significant sampling error and can miss up to 30% of cancers and may show underestimation of Gleason grade, especially in anteriorly located tumors. It may lead to an increase in complications. MRI has an essential role to play in making safer in diagnosis. It can aid in staging also and surgery or radiation treatment planning. Although T2W MRI has been used widely for diagnosis on the basis of its excellent soft tissue resolution, but its accuracy for the detection and localization of cancer prostate is unsatisfactory. The implementation of multi parametric MRI: MR spectroscopy, Dynamic contrast enhanced and diffusion weighted imaging into a diagnosis program improve the diagnostic performance. These advances are beginning to translate into better treatment selection and more accurate image-guided therapies. In addition, early detection of local recurrence.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection of prostate cancer with three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound: correlation with biopsy results
    Zhao, H-X
    Zhu, Q.
    Wang, Z-C
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1014): : 714 - 719
  • [32] Comparison of Outcomes of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy (TRUS) and Transperineal Template Guided biopsy of Prostate in Patient on Active Surveillance (AS) for Low Risk Localised Prostate Cancer.
    Ejikeme, C.
    Mistry, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 153 - 153
  • [33] Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate
    Paul, R
    Korzinek, C
    Necknig, U
    Niesel, T
    Alschibaja, M
    Leyh, H
    Hartung, R
    UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (03) : 532 - 536
  • [34] Robotic Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Lim, Sunghwan
    Jun, Changhan
    Chang, Doyoung
    Petrisor, Doru
    Han, Misop
    Stoianovici, Dan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 66 (09) : 2527 - 2537
  • [35] Miliary Tuberculosis Following Transrectal Ultrasonography (TRUS)-Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Kim, Chul Jang
    Sano, Taichi
    Takimoto, Keita
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 52 (06) : 425 - 427
  • [36] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Wang, Hsin-Kai
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2021, 29 (02) : 75 - 76
  • [37] Trans rectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy of the prostate
    Ganzer, Roman
    Denzinger, Stefan
    Wieland, Wolf F.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A232 - A233
  • [38] Role of transrectal ultrasound and prostate biopsy
    Melchior, SW
    Brawer, MK
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1996, 24 (08) : 463 - 471
  • [39] Prostate volume affects the likelihood of diagnosis of adenocarcinoma on transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy
    Shum, C. F.
    Lee, Y. K. F.
    Mukherjee, A.
    Lim, T. P.
    Teo, C. P. C.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 : 50 - 50
  • [40] Prostatic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy schemes and TRUS prostatic lesion-guided biopsies.
    Scattoni, V
    Zlotta, AR
    Nava, L
    Roscigno, M
    Montorsi, F
    Rigatti, P
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2002, 1 (06) : 28 - 34