Seismic performance of the historical masonry clock tower and influence of the adjacent walls

被引:12
|
作者
Cakir, Ferit [1 ]
Uysal, Habib [2 ]
机构
[1] Amasya Univ, Dept Architecture, Amasya, Turkey
[2] Ataturk Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Erzurum, Turkey
关键词
masonry clock towers; seismic assessment; adjacent structures; finite element method; seismic behavior; time history analysis; BELL TOWER;
D O I
10.12989/eas.2014.7.2.217
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Ancient masonry towers are regarded as among the most important historical heritage structures of the world. These slender structures typically have orthogonal and circular geometry in plane. These structural forms are commonly installed with adjacent structures. Because of their geometrical shapes and structural constraints, ancient masonry towers are more vulnerable to earthquake damage. The main goal of the paper is to investigate the seismic behavior of Erzurum Clock Tower under earthquake loading and to determine the contribution of the castle walls to the seismic performance of the tower. In this study, four three-dimensional finite element models of the Erzurum Clock Tower were developed and the seismic responses of the models were investigated. Time history analyses were performed using the earthquakes that took place in Turkey in 1983 near Erzurum and in 1992 near Erzincan. In the first model, the clock tower was modeled without the adjacent walls; in the second model, the clock tower was modeled with a castle wall on the south side; in the third model, the clock tower was modeled with a castle wall on the north side; and in the last model, the clock tower was modeled with two castle walls on both the north and south sides. Results of the analyses show that the adjacent walls do not allow lateral movements and the horizontal displacements decreases. It is concluded that the adjacent structures should be taken into consideration when modeling seismic performance in order to get accurate and realistic results.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 231
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Seismic behavior of historical masonry arched walls reinforced with novel hybrid FRPs
    Lin, Boxu
    Chun, Qing
    Ma, Yukun
    STRUCTURES, 2025, 71
  • [32] Seismic Upgrading of a Historical Masonry Bell Tower through an Internal Dissipative Steel Structure
    Pavia, Arianna
    Scozzese, Fabrizio
    Petrucci, Enrica
    Zona, Alessandro
    BUILDINGS, 2021, 11 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [33] Seismic Performance Assessment of Reinforced Masonry Core Walls with Boundary Elements
    Mahrous, Amgad
    AbdelRahman, Belal
    Galal, Khaled
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2023, VOL 11, CSCE 2023, 2024, 505 : 411 - 426
  • [34] Seismic Performance of Cantilever-Reinforced Concrete Masonry Shear Walls
    Ahmadi, Farhad
    Hernandez, Jaime
    Sherman, Jacob
    Kapoi, Christina
    Klingner, Richard E.
    McLean, David I.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 140 (09)
  • [35] Seismic performance of severely seismically damaged masonry walls strengthened by BFRP
    Lei, Z. (leizhen0916@163.com), 1600, Central South University of Technology (44):
  • [36] Seismic performance of composite walls made of reinforced concrete and brick masonry
    Liang, Jianguo
    Zhang, Wangxi
    Zheng, Yongqiang
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2003, 24 (03):
  • [37] Experimental Seismic Performance Evaluation of Unreinforced Brick Masonry Shear Walls
    Javed, Mohammed
    Magenes, Guido
    Alam, Bashir
    Khan, Akhtar Naeem
    Ali, Qaisar
    Syed, Ali M.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (01) : 215 - 246
  • [38] Seismic Performance Quantification of Reinforced Masonry Structural Walls with Boundary Elements
    Banting, Bennett R.
    El-Dakhakhni, Wael W.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 140 (05)
  • [39] Seismic performance of masonry walls with GFRP and Geogrid Bed joint reinforcement
    Sadek, H.
    Lissel, S.
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2013, 41 : 977 - 989
  • [40] Seismic behaviour of confined masonry walls
    Tomazevic, M
    Klemenc, I
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1997, 26 (10): : 1059 - 1071