The efficiency of gravity distribution devices for on-site wastewater treatment systems

被引:3
|
作者
Patel, T. [1 ]
O'Luanaigh, N. [1 ]
Gill, L. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Dept Civil Struct & Environm Engn, Dublin 2, Ireland
关键词
distribution device; flow splitter; on-site wastewater; septic tank;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2008.364
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A detailed analysis of different types of gravity distribution devices, designed to split on-site wastewater effluent equally between percolation trenches, has been carried out both in the laboratory and also in the field under realistic loading conditions. Five different types of distribution device have been compared: a V-notch distribution box, stilling chamber box, T-splitters with and without baffles and tipping bucket device. The trials carried out in the laboratory with clean water showed that flow distribution for all devices was sensitive to both the off-level installation angles and variable flow rates, with the most stable performance achieved using the T-splitters with baffles and tipping bucket devices. In parallel to this, the on-site flow regime experienced at two sites was continuously monitored using a tipping bucket and data-logger over eighteen month periods, finding that the most common flow rates at the distribution unit were in the range of 0.1-2.5 L/min. The on-site performance of these devices receiving both septic tank and secondary treated effluent showed that significant solid deposition and biofilm development had severely affected the equal distribution between the trenches, hence highlighting the need for regular maintenance to ensure efficient performance over time after installation.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 465
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Engineered ecosystem for on-site wastewater treatment in tropical areas
    Salomao, Andre Luis de Sa
    Marques, Marcia
    Severo, Raul Goncalves
    da Cruz Roque, Odir Clecio
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 66 (10) : 2131 - 2137
  • [42] Comparisons of Packing Materials in On-Site Wastewater Treatment System
    Chabaud, Sylvaine
    Andres, Yves
    Lakel, Abdel
    Le Cloirec, Pierre
    [J]. WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 1 (03):
  • [43] On-site carwash wastewater treatment and reuse: a systematic review
    Torkashvand, Javad
    Pasalari, Hasan
    Gholami, Mitra
    Younesi, Shahrbanou
    Oskoei, Vahide
    Farzadkia, Mahdi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 102 (15) : 3613 - 3627
  • [44] New technologies for on-site domestic and agricultural wastewater treatment
    Joy, D
    Weil, C
    Crolla, A
    Bonte-Gelok, S
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2001, 28 : 115 - 123
  • [45] Alternative on-site sewage treatment systems
    Christopherson, SH
    [J]. BIOCYCLE, 2001, 42 (09) : 30 - 33
  • [46] Evaluation of On-site Wastewater Disposal Systems in Mississippi Coastal Areas
    Dey, Ayanangshu
    Truax, Dennis D.
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2012, 223 (05): : 2145 - 2156
  • [47] Modeling trench sidewall and bottom flow in on-site wastewater systems
    Finch, S. D.
    Radcliffe, D. E.
    West, L. T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2008, 13 (08) : 693 - 701
  • [49] Evaluation of On-site Wastewater Disposal Systems in Mississippi Coastal Areas
    Ayanangshu Dey
    Dennis D. Truax
    [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2012, 223 : 2145 - 2156
  • [50] Treatability of nonylphenol ethoxylate surfactants in on-site wastewater disposal systems
    Huntsman, Brent E.
    Staples, Charles A.
    Naylor, Carter G.
    Williams, Jim-Bob
    [J]. WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2006, 78 (12) : 2397 - 2404