The efficiency of gravity distribution devices for on-site wastewater treatment systems

被引:3
|
作者
Patel, T. [1 ]
O'Luanaigh, N. [1 ]
Gill, L. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Dept Civil Struct & Environm Engn, Dublin 2, Ireland
关键词
distribution device; flow splitter; on-site wastewater; septic tank;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2008.364
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A detailed analysis of different types of gravity distribution devices, designed to split on-site wastewater effluent equally between percolation trenches, has been carried out both in the laboratory and also in the field under realistic loading conditions. Five different types of distribution device have been compared: a V-notch distribution box, stilling chamber box, T-splitters with and without baffles and tipping bucket device. The trials carried out in the laboratory with clean water showed that flow distribution for all devices was sensitive to both the off-level installation angles and variable flow rates, with the most stable performance achieved using the T-splitters with baffles and tipping bucket devices. In parallel to this, the on-site flow regime experienced at two sites was continuously monitored using a tipping bucket and data-logger over eighteen month periods, finding that the most common flow rates at the distribution unit were in the range of 0.1-2.5 L/min. The on-site performance of these devices receiving both septic tank and secondary treated effluent showed that significant solid deposition and biofilm development had severely affected the equal distribution between the trenches, hence highlighting the need for regular maintenance to ensure efficient performance over time after installation.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 465
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of gravity distribution devices used in on-site domestic wastewater treatment systems
    Patel, T.
    O'Luanaigh, N.
    Gill, L. W.
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2008, 191 (1-4): : 55 - 69
  • [2] A Comparison of Gravity Distribution Devices Used in On-Site Domestic Wastewater Treatment Systems
    T. Patel
    N. O’Luanaigh
    L. W. Gill
    [J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2008, 191 : 55 - 69
  • [3] Performance standards for on-site wastewater treatment systems
    Hoover, MT
    Sievers, D
    Gustafson, D
    [J]. ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDIVIDUAL AND SMALL COMMUNITY SEWAGE SYSTEMS, 1998, : 346 - 355
  • [4] Evaluation of small on-site wastewater treatment systems
    Hellstrom, Daniel
    Jonsson, Lena
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 17 (06) : 728 - 739
  • [5] Treatment efficiency of package plants for on-site wastewater treatment in cold climates
    Vidal, Brenda
    Kinnunen, Juho
    Hedstrom, Annelie
    Heiderscheidt, Elisangela
    Rossi, Pekka
    Herrmann, Inga
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 342
  • [6] Effective distribution of domestic wastewater effluent between percolation trenches in on-site treatment systems
    Gill, LW
    Hand, A
    O'Súlleabháin, C
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 51 (10) : 39 - 46
  • [7] PRESSURIZED DISTRIBUTION FOR ON-SITE DOMESTIC WASTEWATER-RENOVATION SYSTEMS
    MOTE, CR
    [J]. ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN, 1984, (870): : 1 - 31
  • [8] Seasonal pathogen removal by alternative on-site wastewater treatment systems
    Pundsack, J
    Axler, R
    Hicks, R
    Henneck, J
    Nordman, D
    McCarthy, B
    [J]. WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2001, 73 (02) : 204 - 212
  • [9] Environmental systems analysis of four on-site wastewater treatment options
    Weiss, Philipp
    Eveborn, David
    Kaerrman, Erik
    Gustafsson, Jon Petter
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2008, 52 (10) : 1153 - 1161
  • [10] Discharge of indicator bacteria from on-site wastewater treatment systems
    Herrmann, Inga
    Vidal, Brenda
    Hedstrom, Annelie
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2017, 91 : 365 - 373