Crop type mapping using LiDAR, Sentinel-2 and aerial imagery with machine learning algorithms

被引:44
|
作者
Prins, Adriaan Jacobus [1 ]
Van Niekerk, Adriaan [1 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Stellenbosch, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
LiDAR; multispectral imagery; sentinel-2; machine learning; crop type classification; per-pixel classification; LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION; AIRBORNE; UAV;
D O I
10.1080/10095020.2020.1782776
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
LiDAR data are becoming increasingly available, which has opened up many new applications. One such application is crop type mapping. Accurate crop type maps are critical for monitoring water use, estimating harvests and in precision agriculture. The traditional approach to obtaining maps of cultivated fields is by manually digitizing the fields from satellite or aerial imagery and then assigning crop type labels to each field - often informed by data collected during ground and aerial surveys. However, manual digitizing and labeling is time-consuming, expensive and subject to human error. Automated remote sensing methods is a cost-effective alternative, with machine learning gaining popularity for classifying crop types. This study evaluated the use of LiDAR data, Sentinel-2 imagery, aerial imagery and machine learning for differentiating five crop types in an intensively cultivated area. Different combinations of the three datasets were evaluated along with ten machine learning. The classification results were interpreted by comparing overall accuracies, kappa, standard deviation and f-score. It was found that LiDAR data successfully differentiated between different crop types, with XGBoost providing the highest overall accuracy of 87.8%. Furthermore, the crop type maps produced using the LiDAR data were in general agreement with those obtained by using Sentinel-2 data, with LiDAR obtaining a mean overall accuracy of 84.3% and Sentinel-2 a mean overall accuracy of 83.6%. However, the combination of all three datasets proved to be the most effective at differentiating between the crop types, with RF providing the highest overall accuracy of 94.4%. These findings provide a foundation for selecting the appropriate combination of remotely sensed data sources and machine learning algorithms for operational crop type mapping.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 227
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Synergy of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Imagery for Early Seasonal Agricultural Crop Mapping
    Valero, Silvia
    Arnaud, Ludovic
    Planells, Milena
    Ceschia, Eric
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (23)
  • [32] Potential of mapping dissolved oxygen in the Little Miami River using Sentinel-2 images and machine learning algorithms
    Salas, Eric Ariel L.
    Kumaran, Sakthi Subburayalu
    Partee, Eric B.
    Willis, Leeoria P.
    Mitchell, Kayla
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 26
  • [33] A deep learning approach for automatic mapping of poplar plantations using Sentinel-2 imagery
    D'Amico, G.
    Francini, S.
    Giannetti, F.
    Vangi, E.
    Travaglini, D.
    Chianucci, F.
    Mattioli, W.
    Grotti, M.
    Puletti, N.
    Corona, P.
    Chirici, G.
    [J]. GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 58 (08) : 1352 - 1368
  • [34] Mapping mangrove in Dongzhaigang, China using Sentinel-2 imagery
    Chen, Na
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 14 (01)
  • [35] MAPPING AND MONITORING WETLANDS USING SENTINEL-2 SATELLITE IMAGERY
    Kaplan, G.
    Avdan, U.
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL GEOADVANCES WORKSHOP - GEOADVANCES 2017: ISPRS WORKSHOP ON MULTI-DIMENSIONAL & MULTI-SCALE SPATIAL DATA MODELING, 2017, 4-4 (W4): : 271 - 277
  • [36] A Machine Learning Approach for Mapping Forest Vegetation in Riparian Zones in an Atlantic Biome Environment Using Sentinel-2 Imagery
    Furuya, Danielle Elis Garcia
    Aguiar, Joao Alex Floriano
    Estrabis, Nayara V.
    Pinheiro, Mayara Maezano Faita
    Furuya, Michelle Tais Garcia
    Pereira, Danillo Roberto
    Goncalves, Wesley Nunes
    Liesenberg, Veraldo
    Li, Jonathan
    Marcato Junior, Jose
    Prado Osco, Lucas
    Ramos, Ana Paula Marques
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (24) : 1 - 16
  • [37] Port Bathymetry Mapping Using Support Vector Machine Technique and Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery
    Mateo-Perez, Vanesa
    Corral-Bobadilla, Marina
    Ortega-Fernandez, Francisco
    Vergara-Gonzalez, Eliseo P.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (13)
  • [38] Comparison of Masking Algorithms for Sentinel-2 Imagery
    Zekoll, Viktoria
    Main-Knorn, Magdalena
    Louis, Jerome
    Frantz, David
    Richter, Rudolf
    Pflug, Bringfried
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (01) : 1 - 21
  • [39] Integration of Time Series Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Imagery for Crop Type Mapping over Oasis Agricultural Areas
    Sun, Luyi
    Chen, Jinsong
    Guo, Shanxin
    Deng, Xinping
    Han, Yu
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [40] Mapping Mediterranean seagrasses with Sentinel-2 imagery
    Traganos, Dimosthenis
    Reinartz, Peter
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2018, 134 : 197 - 209