Estimation of the measurement uncertainty based on quasi Monte-Carlo method in optical measurement

被引:0
|
作者
Jing Hui [1 ]
Huang Mei-Fa [1 ]
Zhong Yan-Ru [2 ]
Kuang Binga [1 ]
Jiang Xiang-Qian [3 ]
机构
[1] Guilin Univ Elect Technol, Sch Mech & Elect Engn, Guiliin 541004, Peoples R China
[2] Guilin Univ Elect Technol, Sch Comp & Control Engn, Guiliin 541004, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Sci & Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
optical measurement; quasi Monte-Carlo method; measurement uncertainty; Monte-Carlo method;
D O I
10.1117/12.791087
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Because measurement uncertainty is an important parameter to evaluate the reliability of measurement results, it is essential to present reliable methods to evaluate the measurement uncertainty especially in precise optical measurement. Though Monte-Carlo (MC) method has been applied to estimate the measurement uncertainty in recent years, this method, however, has some shortcomings such as low convergence and unstable results. Therefore its' application is limited. To evaluate the measurement uncertainty in a fast and robust way, Quasi Monte-Carlo (QMC) method is adopted in this paper. In the estimating process, more homogeneous random numbers (quasi random numbers) are generated based on Halton's sequence, and then these random numbers are transformed into the desired distribution random numbers. An experiment of cylinder measurement is given. The results show that the Quasi Monte-Carlo method has higher convergence rate and more stable evaluation results than that of Monte-Carlo method. Therefore, the quasi Monte-Carlo method can be applied efficiently to evaluate the measurement uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of measurement uncertainty based on quasi-Monte-Carlo method in the large diameter measurement
    Jing, Hui
    Li, Cong
    Kuang, Bing
    Huang, Meifa
    Zhong, Yanru
    [J]. OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 51 (09)
  • [2] Uncertainty estimation of primary pH-measurement system by Monte-Carlo simulation method
    Cristancho, R. O.
    Castillo, A. M.
    [J]. III COLOMBIAN CONGRESS OF ELECTROCHEMISTRY, 2018, 1119
  • [3] MODELLING OF SYMMETRY MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY USING MONTE-CARLO METHOD
    Kulderknup, E.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF DAAAM BALTIC INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2012, : 496 - 499
  • [4] MONTE-CARLO BASED DETERMINATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY FOR IMAGING SPECTROMETERS
    Lenhard, Karim
    [J]. 2013 5TH WORKSHOP ON HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING: EVOLUTION IN REMOTE SENSING (WHISPERS), 2013,
  • [5] Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty Based on Monte Carlo Method
    Wang, X. M.
    Xiong, J. L.
    Xie, J. Z.
    [J]. 2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SCIENCE (ICCEMS 2018), 2018, 206
  • [6] Application of Monte-Carlo method in measurement uncertainty evaluation of complicated model
    Wang, Wei
    Song, Mingshun
    Chen, Yihua
    Gu, Longfang
    Tao, Jingxuan
    [J]. Yi Qi Yi Biao Xue Bao/Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2008, 29 (07): : 1446 - 1449
  • [7] Uncertainty Evaluation Study of CMM Dynamic Measurement Based on Quasi Monte Carlo Method
    Zhong Weihong
    Ma Xiushui
    Li Yingdao
    Li Yuan
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PRECISION INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2012, 103 : 366 - 371
  • [8] Analysis of uncertainty in harmonic measurement based on Monte Carlo method
    Huang, De-Hua
    Zhang, Lu-Liang
    Zeng, Jiang
    Sun, Wei-Wei
    [J]. Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control, 2012, 40 (20): : 62 - 67
  • [9] Calculation of measurement inaccuracy with the Monte-Carlo method
    Siebert, BRL
    [J]. PTB-MITTEILUNGEN, 2001, 111 (04): : 323 - 337
  • [10] Measurement uncertainty of transmission line resistance calculation using "Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement' and adaptive Monte-Carlo method
    Tolic, Ivan
    Milicevic, Kruno
    Tokic, Amir
    [J]. IET SCIENCE MEASUREMENT & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 11 (03) : 339 - 345