Optimal investment strategies and risk-sharing arrangements for a hybrid pension plan

被引:15
|
作者
Wang, Suxin [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Yi [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Simon Fraser Univ, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, Burnaby, BC, Canada
来源
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Hybrid pension plan; Intergenerational risk sharing; Hamilton-jacobi-Bellman equation; Stochastic optimal control; Optimal investment; Loss function; AS-YOU-GO; OPTIMAL MIX; SCHEMES; SUSTAINABILITY; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.09.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A continuous time stochastic model is used to study a hybrid pension plan, where both the contribution and benefit levels are adjusted depending on the performance of the plan, with risk sharing between different generations. The pension fund is invested in a risk-free asset and multiple risky assets. The objective is to seek an optimal investment strategy and optimal risk-sharing arrangements for plan trustees and participants so that this proposed hybrid pension system provides adequate and stable income to retirees while adjusting contributions effectively, as well as keeping its sustainability in the long run. These goals are achieved by minimizing the expected discount disutility of intermediate adjustment for both benefits and contributions and that of terminal wealth in finite time horizon. Using the stochastic optimal control approach, closed-form solutions are derived under quadratic loss function and exponential loss function. Numerical analysis is presented to illustrate the sensitivity of the optimal strategies to parameters of the financial market and how the optimal benefit changes with respect to different risk aversions. Through numerical analysis, we find that the optimal strategies do adjust the contributions and retirement benefits according to fund performance and model objectives so the intergenerational risk sharing seem effectively achieved for this collective hybrid pension plan. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 62
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimal Investment Strategy of Target Benefit Pension Plan Based on Random Inflation and Intergenerational Risk
    ZHANG Jing
    WANG Chuanyu
    WU Jinjin
    [J]. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2021, 26 (05) : 383 - 393
  • [42] Risk-sharing and optimal contracts with large exogenous risks
    Martin, Jessica
    Villeneuve, Stephane
    [J]. DECISIONS IN ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2023, 46 (01) : 1 - 43
  • [43] Optimal risk-sharing across a network of insurance companies
    Ettlin, Nicolas
    Farkas, Walter
    Kull, Andreas
    Smirnow, Alexander
    [J]. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2020, 95 : 39 - 47
  • [44] Risk-sharing and optimal contracts with large exogenous risks
    Jessica Martin
    Stéphane Villeneuve
    [J]. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 2023, 46 : 1 - 43
  • [45] PERFORMANCE-BASED RISK-SHARING ARRANGEMENTS IN DIAGNOSTICS AND DEVICES IN THE UNITED STATES
    Chen, Y.
    Carlson, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S238 - S238
  • [46] International investment positions and risk-sharing: an empirical analysis on the coordinated portfolio investment survey
    Pericoli, Filippo M.
    Pierucci, Eleonora
    Ventura, Luigi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS AND ECONOMETRICS, 2015, 5 (04) : 364 - 391
  • [47] When do performance-based risk-sharing arrangements make sense?
    Drummond, Michael
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 16 (06): : 569 - 571
  • [48] Optimal risk-sharing under adverse selection and imperfect risk perception
    Chassagnon, A
    Villeneuve, B
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2005, 38 (03): : 955 - 978
  • [49] ASYMMETRIC TECHNOLOGICAL UNCERTAINTY AND INTERNATIONAL-TRADE IN THE PRESENCE OF RISK-SHARING ARRANGEMENTS
    ISHII, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE, 1986, 46 (01): : 1 - 16
  • [50] When do performance-based risk-sharing arrangements make sense?
    Michael Drummond
    [J]. The European Journal of Health Economics, 2015, 16 : 569 - 571