Muslim CEOs, risk-taking and firm performance

被引:5
|
作者
Ooi, Chai-Aun [1 ]
Hooy, Chee-Wooi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utara Malaysia, Sch Econ Finance & Banking, Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia
[2] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Management, George Town 11800, Malaysia
关键词
Muslim CEO; Risk-taking; Firm performance; Gender; Foreign education; Degree of education; PANEL-DATA; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; STRATEGIC RISK; UPPER ECHELONS; RELIGION; ATTITUDES; BEHAVIOR; RETURN; MATTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101818
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study investigates Muslim CEOs' risk-taking and firm performance. Unlike the other Islamic countries, our focus on Malaysia because the public listed firms have well mixture of Muslim and non-Muslim CEOs, in the addition that the CEOs exhibit heterogenous demographic profile in gender, degree of education and foreign educational exposure. We apply balanced panel consisting of 803 firms for 2009-2017. Based on the results of fixed effect panel regression and GMM, we show that Muslim CEO which is represented in a dummy variable positively influences the relationship between risk-taking and firm performance. The result is unchanged using either earnings volatility or z-score as the proxy of risk-taking. Even, with two-stage Heckman sample selection bias approach, we obtain the similar result. In the addition, we show that female Muslim CEOs, postgraduate degree of education, and foreign educational exposure have significant negative moderating effect on the relationship between risk-taking and firm performance. As we observe Muslim CEOs are sensitive to firm performance, their acquired risk-taking style influenced by the religion can be moderated by the feministic characteristic of female that is naturally possess and the developed skills and knowledge via education.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] All risk-taking is not the same: examining the competing effects of firm risk-taking with meta-analysis
    Mathias Arrfelt
    Michael Mannor
    Jennifer D. Nahrgang
    Amanda L. Christensen
    [J]. Review of Managerial Science, 2018, 12 : 621 - 660
  • [22] All risk-taking is not the same: examining the competing effects of firm risk-taking with meta-analysis
    Arrfelt, Mathias
    Mannor, Michael
    Nahrgang, Jennifer D.
    Christensen, Amanda L.
    [J]. REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 12 (03) : 621 - 660
  • [23] The influence of firm life cycle on firm risk-taking: evidence of Vietnam
    Nguyen-Quynh-Nhu Ngo
    Cam-Nguyen Nguyen
    Nguyen-Nhu-Ngoc Ngo
    Thanh-Khang Nguyen
    [J]. International Review of Economics, 2024, 71 (3) : 691 - 726
  • [24] CFOs versus CEOs: Risk-taking incentives and decisions of corporate policies
    Huang, Han-Ching
    Tung, Pei-Shan
    [J]. INVESTMENT ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2021, 50 (04) : 209 - 226
  • [25] Do CEOs Who Are Raising Daughters Reduce Company Risk-taking?
    Feng, Mingming
    Wang, Xia
    Xu, Xiaodong
    Zhou, Mengjiao
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2024, 53 (01) : 6 - 34
  • [26] CEOs' hometown connections and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China
    Fu, Fanjie
    Fang, Jing
    Zhang, Fan
    Yao, Shujie
    Ou, Jinghua
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2024, 60
  • [27] The relationship between managerial attributes and firm risk-taking
    Salehi, Mahdi
    Arianpoor, Arash
    Naghshbandi, Nader
    [J]. TQM JOURNAL, 2022, 34 (04): : 728 - 748
  • [28] Rivals risk-taking incentives and firm corporate policy
    Abdoh, Hussein
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2023, 90 : 106 - 123
  • [29] Does firm competitiveness affect corporate risk-taking?
    Chang, Vincent Y. L.
    [J]. MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2023, 49 (07) : 1097 - 1112
  • [30] RISK-TAKING AND ETHICAL RISK-TAKING - NO RELATIONSHIP
    HORNE, WC
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1972, 30 (02) : 492 - &