Intravenous Fluid for the Treatment of Emergency Department Patients With Migraine Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:11
|
作者
Jones, Christopher W. [1 ]
Remboski, Lauren B. [1 ]
Freeze, Brian [1 ]
Braz, Valerie A. [1 ]
Gaughan, John P. [2 ]
McLean, Samuel A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rowan Univ, Cooper Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med, Camden, NJ 08102 USA
[2] Cooper Univ Hosp, Cooper Res Inst, Camden, NJ USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Anesthesiol, TRYUMPH Res Program, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Emergency Med, TRYUMPH Res Program, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: The objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility and necessity of performing a large-scale trial to measure the effect of intravenous fluid therapy on migraine headache pain. Methods: This was a single-center, pilot randomized controlled trial. We randomized adult emergency department migraine headache patients to receive 1 L of normal saline solution during 1 hour (fluid group) or saline solution at 10 mL/hour for 1 hour (control group). All patients received intravenous prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine at the start of fluid administration. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded; nurses administering the intervention were not. Outcomes were assessed at 60 and 120 minutes, and 48 hours. The primary outcome was the difference in the verbal pain rating (on a scale of 0 to 10) between 0 and 60 minutes. Key secondary outcomes included additional clinical endpoints, the rate of protocol completion, and the effectiveness of blinding. Results: Fifty patients consented to participate; one withdrew, leaving 25 patients randomized to the fluid group and 24 in the no fluid group. The mean improvement in 0- to 60-minute pain score was 4.5 (95% confidence interval 3.7 to 5.3) in the fluid group and 4.9 (95% confidence interval 3.5 to 6.2) in the control group. Primary outcome data were collected for 49 of 50 enrolled patients, and only one participant correctly identified the group assignment. Conclusion: This pilot study showed no statistically significant treatment effect from fluid administration, but does not exclude the possibility of a clinically important treatment effect. The study protocol and approach to blinding are both feasible and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 156
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A randomized controlled trial of telemedicine in an emergency department
    Brennan, JA
    Kealy, JA
    Gerardi, LH
    Shih, R
    Allegra, J
    Sannipoli, L
    Lutz, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 1998, 4 : 18 - 20
  • [32] Telemedicine in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial
    Brennan, JA
    Kealy, JA
    Gerardi, LH
    Shih, R
    Allegra, J
    Sannipoli, L
    Lutz, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 1999, 5 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [33] Intranasal fentanyl spray versus intravenous opioids for the treatment of severe pain in patients with cancer in the emergency department setting: A randomized controlled trial
    Banala, Srinivas R.
    Khattab, Osama K.
    Page, Valda D.
    Warneke, Carla L.
    Todd, Knox H.
    Yeung, Sai-Ching Jim
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):
  • [34] Early Response to Intravenous Fluid for Children with Acute Migraine in the Emergency Department
    Richer, L.
    Craig, W.
    Rowe, B.
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2013, 33 (S8) : 25 - 25
  • [35] Comparison of intravenous pantoprazole and ranitidine in patients with dyspepsia presented to the emergency department: a randomized, double blind, controlled trial
    Engin Senay
    Cenker Eken
    Murat Yildiz
    Derya Yilmaz
    Erhan Alkan
    Mete Akin
    Mustafa Serinken
    [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2016, 7 (01) : 30 - 34
  • [36] A randomized, controlled trial of oral versus intravenous fluids for lowering blood glucose in emergency department patients with hyperglycemia
    Arora, Sanjay
    Probst, Marc A.
    Andrews, Laura
    Camilion, Marissa
    Grock, Andrew
    Hayward, Gregory
    Menchine, Michael
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 16 (03) : 214 - 219
  • [37] Comparison of intravenous pantoprazole and ranitidine in patients with dyspepsia presented to the emergency department: a randomized, double blind, controlled trial
    Senay, Engin
    Eken, Cenker
    Yildiz, Murat
    Yilmaz, Derya
    Alkan, Erhan
    Akin, Mete
    Serinken, Mustafa
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 7 (01) : 30 - 34
  • [38] Comparison of intravenous pantoprazole and ranitidine in patients with dyspepsia presented to the emergency department: a randomized, double blind, controlled trial
    Engin Senay
    Cenker Eken
    Murat Yildiz
    Derya Yilmaz
    Erhan Alkan
    Mete Akin
    Mustafa Serinken
    [J]. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2016, (01) : 30 - 34
  • [39] A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Intravenous Prochlorperazine Versus Subcutaneous Sumatriptan in Acute Migraine Therapy in the Emergency Department
    Kostic, Mark A.
    Gutierrez, Francisco J.
    Rieg, Thomas S.
    Moore, Tammy S.
    Gendron, Richard T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 56 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [40] Intravenous ibuprofen versus sodium valproate in acute migraine attacks in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial
    Dogruyol, Sinem
    Gur, Sultan Tuna Akgol
    Akbas, Ilker
    Kocak, Meryem Betos
    Kocak, Abdullah Osman
    Ceylan, Mustafa
    Tekyol, Davut
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 55 : 126 - 132