Intravenous Fluid for the Treatment of Emergency Department Patients With Migraine Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:11
|
作者
Jones, Christopher W. [1 ]
Remboski, Lauren B. [1 ]
Freeze, Brian [1 ]
Braz, Valerie A. [1 ]
Gaughan, John P. [2 ]
McLean, Samuel A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rowan Univ, Cooper Med Sch, Dept Emergency Med, Camden, NJ 08102 USA
[2] Cooper Univ Hosp, Cooper Res Inst, Camden, NJ USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Anesthesiol, TRYUMPH Res Program, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Emergency Med, TRYUMPH Res Program, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: The objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility and necessity of performing a large-scale trial to measure the effect of intravenous fluid therapy on migraine headache pain. Methods: This was a single-center, pilot randomized controlled trial. We randomized adult emergency department migraine headache patients to receive 1 L of normal saline solution during 1 hour (fluid group) or saline solution at 10 mL/hour for 1 hour (control group). All patients received intravenous prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine at the start of fluid administration. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded; nurses administering the intervention were not. Outcomes were assessed at 60 and 120 minutes, and 48 hours. The primary outcome was the difference in the verbal pain rating (on a scale of 0 to 10) between 0 and 60 minutes. Key secondary outcomes included additional clinical endpoints, the rate of protocol completion, and the effectiveness of blinding. Results: Fifty patients consented to participate; one withdrew, leaving 25 patients randomized to the fluid group and 24 in the no fluid group. The mean improvement in 0- to 60-minute pain score was 4.5 (95% confidence interval 3.7 to 5.3) in the fluid group and 4.9 (95% confidence interval 3.5 to 6.2) in the control group. Primary outcome data were collected for 49 of 50 enrolled patients, and only one participant correctly identified the group assignment. Conclusion: This pilot study showed no statistically significant treatment effect from fluid administration, but does not exclude the possibility of a clinically important treatment effect. The study protocol and approach to blinding are both feasible and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 156
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized placebo-controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroids for the treatment of migraine in the emergency department
    Friedman, B. W.
    Greenwald, P.
    Bania, T. C.
    Hochberg, M. L.
    Corbo, J.
    Chu, J.
    Clark, S.
    Lipton, R. B.
    Gallagher, E. J.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2007, 47 (05): : 749 - 750
  • [2] Intravenous Caffeine versus Intravenous Ketorolac for the Management of Moderate to Severe Migraine Headache in the Emergency Department; A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Baratloo, A.
    Friedman, B.
    Rouhipour, A.
    Mirbaha, S.
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2017, 57 (08): : 1313 - 1314
  • [3] Randomized clinical trial of intravenous magnesium sulfate as an adjunctive medication for emergency department treatment of migraine headache
    Corbo, J
    Esses, D
    Bijur, PE
    Iannaccone, R
    Gallagher, EJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 38 (06) : 621 - 627
  • [4] Randomized Controlled Trial of Treatment Expectation and Intravenous Fluid in Pediatric Migraine
    Richer, Lawrence
    Craig, William
    Rowe, Brian
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2014, 54 (09): : 1496 - 1505
  • [5] Intravenous Chlorpromazine in the Emergency Department treatment of migraines: A randomized controlled trial
    Bigal, ME
    Bordini, CA
    Speciali, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 23 (02): : 141 - 148
  • [6] Treatment of migraine - A headache for the emergency department
    Becker, W. J.
    Kryscio, R. J.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2007, 69 (22) : 2034 - 2035
  • [7] A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS HALOPERIDOL VS. INTRAVENOUS METOCLOPRAMIDE FOR ACUTE MIGRAINE THERAPY IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Gaffigan, Matthew E.
    Bruner, David I.
    Wason, Courtney
    Pritchard, Amy
    Frumkin, Kenneth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (03): : 326 - 334
  • [8] COMMENT ON A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS HALOPERIDOL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS METOCLOPRAMIDE FOR ACUTE MIGRAINE THERAPY IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Fisher, Harold
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 52 (03): : E75 - E75
  • [9] PROCHLORPERAZINE VS. PROMETHAZINE FOR HEADACHE TREATMENT IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Callan, James E.
    Kostic, Mark A.
    Bachrach, Ethan A.
    Rieg, Thomas S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (03): : 247 - 253
  • [10] Intravenous dexketoprofen vs placebo for migraine attack in the emergency department: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Gungor, Faruk
    Akyol, Kamil Can
    Kesapli, Mustafa
    Celik, Ahmet
    Karaca, Adeviye
    Bozdemir, Mehmet Nuri
    Eken, Cenker
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 2016, 36 (02) : 179 - 184