In vitro analysis of distraction osteogenesis

被引:8
|
作者
Matsuno, M [1 ]
Hata, KI [1 ]
Sumi, Y [1 ]
Mizuno, H [1 ]
Ueda, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Showa Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4668550, Japan
关键词
distraction osteogenesis; organ culture; ossification mode;
D O I
10.1097/00001665-200011040-00002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Distraction osteogenesis has been widely used for lengthening craniomaxillofacial bone. The healing process of distracted bone has been studied mainly by histological observation in vivo. To analyze the cellular response to the mechanical stress of distraction, we have established and evaluated an in vitro model of distraction osteogenesis using an organ culture technique. Five-week-old male Wistar rats were used for the experiments. The tibial bone was fractured by hand and fixed for 1 week by acrylic resin. After the initial healing period, the tibial bone was harvested and used for this study. A distraction instrument was devised to control the strain on the cultured bone using a micrometer. After distraction, the samples were histologically evaluated for ossification by hematoxylin and eosin stain and Alcian blue stain. As a result, the histological finding for the bone region at a slow rate of distraction (0.5 mm/day) was different from that at a rapid rate of distraction (1.0 mm/day). The proliferation of cartilage was inhibited at the rapid distraction rate. Thus, we hypothesized that mechanical stress regulated cartilaginous growth in tissue cultivation. Judging from this experiment, the model was useful for investigation of the mechanism of bone formation in distraction osteogenesis, because it was simple and served to isolate many factors.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 307
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intraoral distraction osteogenesis
    Guerrero, CA
    Bell, WH
    Barros-St Pasteur, J
    Meza, LS
    INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES, 1997, : 183 - 199
  • [32] Distraction osteogenesis in the hand
    Pensler, JM
    Carroll, NC
    Cheng, LF
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (01) : 92 - 95
  • [33] An in vitro study of the accuracy of a new protocol for planning distraction osteogenesis of the mandible
    Seldin, EB
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 58 (09) : 990 - 991
  • [34] Longitudinal cephalometric analysis after maxillary distraction osteogenesis
    Krimmel, M
    Cornelius, CP
    Bacher, M
    Gülicher, D
    Reinert, S
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 16 (04) : 683 - 688
  • [35] A Craniometric Analysis of Posterior Cranial Vault Distraction Osteogenesis
    Goldstein, Jesse A.
    Paliga, J. Thomas
    Wink, Jason D.
    Low, David W.
    Bartlett, Scott P.
    Taylor, Jesse A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (06) : 1367 - 1375
  • [36] Osteotomy versus Distraction Osteogenesis - A State of the Art Analysis
    Santler, G.
    INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2015, 47 (04): : 235 - 241
  • [37] Analysis of Resorption and Need for Overcorrection in Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis
    Reininger, David
    Rodriguez-Grandjean, Alfredo
    Lopez-Quiles, Juan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (04) : 865 - 869
  • [38] Outcome Analysis of Morcellation Craniotomy with Distraction Osteogenesis for Scaphocephaly
    Sakamoto, Yoshiaki
    Nakajima, Hideo
    Tamada, Ikkei
    PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 49 (04) : 248 - 253
  • [39] Reflections on: Distraction osteogenesis - A surgical distraction or the 'future'?
    Booth, RPW
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 39 (03): : 179 - 180
  • [40] Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in a Patient With Osteogenesis Imperfecta
    Kunkel, Ryan
    Kim, Erinn
    Tuncer, Fatma Betul
    Siddiqi, Faizi
    Gociman, Barbu
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (08) : 2530 - 2532