Evaluation of North American antibody detection tests for diagnosis of brucellosis in goats

被引:25
|
作者
Mikolon, AB
Gardner, IA
Hietala, SK
De Anda, JH
Pestaña, EC
Hennager, SG
Edmondson, AJ
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Med & Epidemiol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Calif Dept Food & Agr, Anim Hlth Branch, Sacramento, CA 95814 USA
[3] USDA, Natl Vet Serv Labs, Diagnost Bacteriol Lab, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[4] Univ Autonoma Baja California, Inst Invest & Ciencias Vet, Mexicali 21100, Baja California, Mexico
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.36.6.1716-1722.1998
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The sensitivities and specificities of 17 antibody detection tests for brucellosis in goats were estimated. Tests evaluated included the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) card test with 8% cell concentration (8%Card), USDA rapid automated presumptive test (RAP), Mexican rose bengal plate tests with 8 and 3% cell concentrations (8%RB and 3%RB), French rose bengal plate test with 4.5% cell concentration (4.5%RB), USDA standard plate test (SPT), USDA buffered acidified plate agglutination test (BAPA), USDA and Mexican rivanol tests (URIV and MRIV), USDA standard tube tests with Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis antigens (SATA and SATM), serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), USDA cold-fixation complement fixation tests with B. abortus and B. melitensis antigens (CFA and CRM), USDA and Mexican milk ring tests (UBRT and MBRT), and a milk ELISA. Test sensitivity was evaluated by using two groups of 10 goats experimentally infected with B. melitensis or B. abortus and monitored for 24 weeks. Specificity was evaluated by using 200 brucellosis-free nonvaccinated goats from 10 California herds. The 3%RB was considered a good screening test because of high sensitivity at week 24 postinfection (90%), ease of performance, and low cost. The cold-fixation CFA and CFM had 100% specificity in the field study and were considered appropriate confirmatory tests. The milk ELISA was significantly more sensitive (P < 0.05) than the UBRT and significantly more specific (P < 0.05) than the MBRT. The milk ELISA also had the advantage of objectivity and ease of interpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:1716 / 1722
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EVALUATION OF SEROLOGICAL TESTS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS IN Brucella melitensis EXPERIMENTALLY INFECTED DROMEDARY CAMELS
    Soellner, N. K.
    Kinne, J.
    Schuster, R. K.
    Johnson, B.
    Jose, Sh.
    Raghavan, R.
    Syriac, G.
    Muttathpaily, N.
    John, J.
    Raja, S.
    Mareena, R.
    Khazanehdari, K.
    Wernery, U.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CAMEL PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (01) : 25 - 28
  • [42] Evaluation of rapid antibody tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection
    Faigel, DO
    Magaret, N
    Corless, C
    Lieberman, DA
    Fennerty, MB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 95 (01): : 72 - 77
  • [43] DITHIOTREITOL IN THE DETECTION OF SPECIFIC IGG ANTIBODY IN BRUCELLOSIS
    ZHELUDKOV, MM
    CHERNYSHEVA, MI
    [J]. LABORATORNOE DELO, 1987, (11): : 870 - 871
  • [44] EVALUATION OF SERODIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR BRUCELLOSIS AMONG SHEEP AND GOATS IN EGYPT
    ABDELGHANI, M
    OSMAN, K
    NADA, SM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ZOONOSES, 1983, 10 (02): : 132 - 137
  • [45] Comparative evaluation of RBPT, I-ELISA, and CFT for the diagnosis of brucellosis and PCR detection of Brucella species from Ethiopian sheep, goats, and cattle sera
    Abinet Legesse
    Aregitu Mekuriaw
    Esayas Gelaye
    Takele Abayneh
    Belayneh Getachew
    Wubet Weldemedhin
    Takele Tesgera
    Getaw Deresse
    Kenaw Birhanu
    [J]. BMC Microbiology, 23
  • [46] Comparative evaluation of RBPT, I-ELISA, and CFT for the diagnosis of brucellosis and PCR detection of Brucella species from Ethiopian sheep, goats, and cattle sera
    Legesse, Abinet
    Mekuriaw, Aregitu
    Gelaye, Esayas
    Abayneh, Takele
    Getachew, Belayneh
    Weldemedhin, Wubet
    Tesgera, Takele
    Deresse, Getaw
    Birhanu, Kenaw
    [J]. BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [47] COMPARISON OF 4 SEROLOGICAL TESTS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CAPRINE BRUCELLOSIS
    WAGHELA, S
    WANDERA, JG
    WAGNER, GG
    [J]. RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 1980, 28 (02) : 168 - 171
  • [48] Evaluation of Brucellacapt for the diagnosis of human brucellosis
    Casao, MA
    Navarro, E
    Solera, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2004, 49 (02) : 102 - 108
  • [49] COMPARISON OF SEROLOGIC TESTS USED IN CANINE BRUCELLOSIS DIAGNOSIS
    MATEUDEANTONIO, EM
    MARTIN, M
    CASAL, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 1994, 6 (02) : 257 - 259
  • [50] STUDY ON SEROLOGICAL TESTS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF HUMAN AND BOVINE BRUCELLOSIS
    KULSHRESHTHA, RC
    ATAL, PR
    WAHI, PN
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1973, 61 (10) : 1471 - 1477