Occupancy data improves parameter precision in spatial capture-recapture models

被引:7
|
作者
Jimenez, Jose [1 ]
Diaz-Ruiz, Francisco [2 ]
Monterroso, Pedro [3 ,4 ]
Tobajas, Jorge [1 ,5 ]
Ferreras, Pablo [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC UCLM JCCM, IREC, Inst Invest Recursos Cineget, Ronda Toledo 12, Ciudad Real 13071, Spain
[2] Univ Malaga, Fac Ciencias, Dept Biol Anim, Malaga, Spain
[3] Univ Porto, Ctr Invest Biodiversidade & Recursos Genet, InBIO Lab Associado, CIBIO, Vairao, Portugal
[4] CIBIO, BIOPOLIS Program Genom, Biodivers & Land Planning, Vairao, Portugal
[5] Univ Cordoba, Dept Bot Ecol & Fisiol Vegetal, Cordoba, Spain
来源
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2022年 / 12卷 / 08期
关键词
camera traps; integrated spatial capture-recapture model; stone marten; telemetry; terrestrial passive integrated transponder; unmarked species; STATISTICAL-INFERENCE; SEED DISPERSAL; DNA DATA; DENSITY; INFORMATION; CARNIVORE;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.9250
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Population size is one of the basic demographic parameters for species management and conservation. Among different estimation methods, spatially explicit capture-recapture (SCR) models allow the estimation of population density in a framework that has been greatly developed in recent years. The use of automated detection devices, such as camera traps, has impressively extended SCR studies for individually identifiable species. However, its application to unmarked/partially marked species remains challenging, and no specific method has been widely used. We fitted an SCR-integrated model (SCR-IM) to stone marten Martes foina data, a species for which only some individuals are individually recognizable by natural marks, and estimate population size based on integration of three submodels: (1) individual capture histories from live capture and transponder tagging; (2) detection/nondetection or "occupancy" data using camera traps in a bigger area to extend the geographic scope of capture-recapture data; and (3) telemetry data from a set of tagged individuals. We estimated a stone marten density of 0.352 (SD: 0.081) individuals/km(2). We simulated four dilution scenarios of occupancy data to study the variation in the coefficient of variation in population size estimates. We also used simulations with similar characteristics as the stone marten case study, comparing the accuracy and precision obtained from SCR-IM and SCR, to understand how submodels' integration affects the posterior distributions of estimated parameters. Based on our simulations, we found that population size estimates using SCR-IM are more accurate and precise. In our stone marten case study, the SCR-IM density estimation increased the precision by 37% when compared to the standard SCR model as regards to the coefficient of variation. This model has high potential to be used for species in which individual recognition by natural markings is not possible, therefore limiting the need to rely on invasive sampling procedures.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An overview of closed capture-recapture models
    Anne Chao
    [J]. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2001, 6 : 158 - 175
  • [32] Mixture Regression Models for Closed Population Capture-Recapture Data
    Tounkara, Fode
    Rivest, Louis-Paul
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2015, 71 (03) : 721 - 730
  • [33] Multistage hierarchical capture-recapture models
    Hooten, Mevin B.
    Schwob, Michael R.
    Johnson, Devin S.
    Ivan, Jacob S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMETRICS, 2023, 34 (06)
  • [34] Estimating abundance with interruptions in data collection using open population spatial capture-recapture models
    Milleret, Cyril
    Dupont, Pierre
    Chipperfield, Joseph
    Turek, Daniel
    Broseth, Henrik
    Gimenez, Olivier
    de Valpine, Perry
    Bischof, Richard
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (07):
  • [35] Performance of spatial capture-recapture models with repurposed data: Assessing estimator robustness for retrospective applications
    Smith, Jennifer B.
    Stevens, Bryan S.
    Etter, Dwayne R.
    Williams, David M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):
  • [36] On identifiability in capture-recapture models - Reply
    Link, William A.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2006, 62 (03) : 936 - 939
  • [37] BUILDING MODELS OF CAPTURE-RECAPTURE EXPERIMENTS
    POLLOCK, KH
    [J]. STATISTICIAN, 1976, 25 (04): : 253 - 259
  • [38] Efficient estimation of large-scale spatial capture-recapture models
    Turek, Daniel
    Milleret, Cyril
    Ergon, Torbjorn
    Broseth, Henrik
    Dupont, Pierre
    Bischof, Richard
    De Valpine, Perry
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (02):
  • [39] Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations
    Theng, Meryl
    Milleret, Cyril
    Bracis, Chloe
    Cassey, Phillip
    Delean, Steven
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2022, 103 (10)
  • [40] Density Estimation in a Wolverine Population Using Spatial Capture-Recapture Models
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Magoun, Audrey J.
    Gardner, Beth
    Valkenburg, Patrick
    Lowell, Richard E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 75 (03): : 604 - 611