Correlation Between Quantitative Angiography-Derived Translesional Pressure and Fractional Flow Reserve

被引:6
|
作者
Seike, Fumiyasu [1 ]
Uetani, Teruyoshi [1 ]
Nishimura, Kazuhisa [1 ]
Iio, Chiharuko [1 ]
Kawakami, Hiroshi [1 ]
Fujimoto, Kaori [1 ]
Higashi, Haruhiko [1 ]
Kono, Tamami [1 ]
Aono, Jun [1 ]
Nagai, Takayuki [1 ]
Inoue, Katsuji [1 ]
Suzuki, Jun [1 ]
Ogimoto, Akiyoshi [1 ]
Okura, Takafumi [1 ]
Yasuda, Kazunori [2 ]
Higaki, Jitsuo [1 ]
Ikeda, Shuntaro [1 ]
机构
[1] Ehime Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Cardiol Pulmonol Hypertens & Nephrol, Toon, Japan
[2] Ehime Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2016年 / 118卷 / 08期
关键词
CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND CRITERIA; FUNCTIONAL-SIGNIFICANCE; STENOSIS SEVERITY; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; BLOOD-FLOW; TOMOGRAPHY; INTERVENTION; VALIDATION; PERFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.026
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is widely used for the assessment of myocardial ischemia. However, it has the disadvantage of cost and invasive complication risks. We investigated the usefulness of quantitative coronary angiography derived translesional pressure (QCA-TP) for predicting functional myocardial ischemia, using FFR as the gold standard. We retrospectively analyzed 152 coronary narrowings (98 left anterior descending arteries, 28 left circumflex arteries, and 26 right) in 132 patients with mild-severe coronary stenosis who underwent coronary angiography and FFR measurements simultaneously. QCA-TP was calculated using software implemented in the QCA software. Coronary morphology was calculated using both densitometry and lumen edges. Functional myocardial ischemia was defined as an FFR of 0.8 or less. The mean values of diameter stenosis by QCA and FFR were 48.9% +/- 14.9 and 0.76 +/- 0.14, respectively. QCA-TP was significantly correlated with FFR (r = 0.76, p <0.01). The cut-off values of QCA-TP for predicting functional myocardial ischemia based on FFR were 72.8 mm Hg for the left, anterior descending arteries (accuracy, 86.7%; area under the curve [AUC], 0.93), 60.5 mm Hg for the left circumflex arteries (accuracy, 89.3%; AUC, 0.88), and 64.4 mm Hg for the right (accuracy, 88.5%; AUC, 0.94). Therefore, our data suggest that QCA-TP can predict myocardial ischemia with high diagnostic accuracy. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1158 / 1163
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correlation of IVUS- Derived Plaque Characteristics and Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve
    Ki, You-Jeong
    Kang, Jeehoon
    Hwang, Doyeon
    Kim, Hyo-Soo
    Koo, Bon-Kwon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 82 (17) : B183 - B183
  • [2] Coronary angiography-derived contrast fractional flow reserve
    Gong, Yanjun
    Zheng, Bo
    Yi, Tieci
    Yang, Fan
    Hong, Tao
    Liu, Zhaoping
    Huo, Yunlong
    Li, Jianping
    Huo, Yong
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 99 (03) : 763 - 771
  • [3] Coronary CT Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve
    Sulaiman N.
    Soon J.
    Leipsic J.
    [J]. Current Radiology Reports, 4 (8)
  • [4] Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve
    Tesche, Christian
    De Cecco, Carlo N.
    Albrecht, Moritz H.
    Duguay, Taylor M.
    Bayer, Richard R., II
    Litwin, Sheldon E.
    Steinberg, Daniel H.
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2017, 285 (01) : 17 - 33
  • [5] Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Invasive Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios
    Johnson, Nils P.
    Matsumura, Mitsuaki
    Achenbach, Stephan
    Engstrom, Thomas
    Assali, Abid
    Jeremias, Allen
    Fournier, Stephane
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Leon, Martin B.
    Fearon, William F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (24) : 3232 - 3233
  • [6] Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative angiography derived translesional pressure in identifying functional myocardial Ischemia in comparison with fractional flow reserve
    Seike, F.
    Ikeda, S.
    Iio, C.
    Kawakami, H.
    Higashi, H.
    Kono, T.
    Uetani, T.
    Aono, J.
    Nagai, T.
    Nishimura, K.
    Inoue, K.
    Suzuki, J.
    Okura, T.
    Yasuda, K.
    Higaki, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 1374 - 1374
  • [7] Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: More or Less Physiology?
    Morris, Paul D.
    Curzen, Nick
    Gunn, Julian P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2020, 9 (06):
  • [8] CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The Global Game of Thrones
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    Gray, Hunter N.
    Tesche, Christian
    [J]. RADIOLOGY-CARDIOTHORACIC IMAGING, 2019, 1 (04):
  • [9] Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in patients with NSTEMI
    Skalidis, Ioannis
    Meier, David
    De Bruyne, Bernard
    Collet, Carlos
    Sonck, Jeroen
    Mahendiran, Thabo
    Rotzinger, David
    Qanadli, Salah Dine
    Eeckhout, Eric
    Muller, Olivier
    Fournier, Stephane
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 101 (02) : 308 - 315
  • [10] Anonymous Comparison of Various Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Software With Pressure-Derived Physiological Assessment
    Ninomiya, Kai
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Kotoku, Nozomi
    Zhou, Jinying
    Kageyama, Shigetaka
    Masuda, Shinichiro
    Revaiah, Pruthvi C.
    Wang, Bo
    He, Xingqiang
    Tsai, Tsung-Ying
    Kageyama, Momoko
    Sevestre, Emelyne
    Sharif, Faisal
    Garg, Scot
    Akasaka, Takashi
    Escane, Javier
    Patel, Manesh R.
    Onuma, Yoshinobu
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (14) : 1778 - 1790