tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review

被引:9
|
作者
Yuan, Bo [1 ]
Tolomeo, Serenella [2 ]
Yang, Chunliang [3 ]
Wang, Ying [1 ]
Yu, Rongjun [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Univ, Dept Psychol, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Psychol, Singapore 117570, Singapore
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Inst Dev Psychol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[4] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Management, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
[5] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Sport Phys Educ & Hlth, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
[6] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Phys, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
meta-analysis; prosocial behavior; transcranial direct current stimulation; stimulation parameters; DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; SOCIAL BRAIN; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; PUBLICATION BIAS; MOTOR CORTEX; NEURAL BASIS; P-CURVE; PSYCHOLOGY; HEALTHY;
D O I
10.1093/scan/nsab067
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Previous studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could potentially promote prosocial behaviors. However, results from randomized controlled trials are inconsistent. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS using single-session protocols on prosocial behaviors in healthy young adults and explore potential moderators of these effects. The results showed that compared with sham stimulation, anodal (excitatory) stimulation significantly increased (g = 0.27, 95% CI [0.11, 0.43], Z = 3.30, P = 0.001) and cathodal (inhibitory) stimulation significantly decreased prosocial behaviors (g = -0.19, 95% CI [-0.39, -0.01], Z = -1.95, P = 0.051) using a multilevel meta-analytic model. These effects were not significantly modulated by stimulation parameters (e.g. duration, intensity and site) and types of prosocial behavior. The risk of publication bias for the included effects was minimal, and no selective reporting (e.g. P-hacking) was found in the P-curve analysis. This meta-analysis showed that both anodal and cathodal tDCS have small but significant effects on prosocial behaviors. The current study provides evidence that prosocial behaviors are linked to the activity of the 'social brain'. Future studies are encouraged to further explore whether tDCS could effectively treat social dysfunctions in psychiatry disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 42
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A meta-analytic review of prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport
    Graupensperger, Scott A.
    Jensen, Ciersti
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 38 : S193 - S194
  • [2] The effects of adolescent prosocial behavior interventions: a meta-analytic review
    Shin, Jongho
    Lee, ByungYoon
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC EDUCATION REVIEW, 2021, 22 (03) : 565 - 577
  • [3] Theory of Mind and Prosocial Behavior in Childhood: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Imuta, Kana
    Henry, Julie D.
    Slaughter, Virginia
    Selcuk, Bilge
    Ruffman, Ted
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 52 (08) : 1192 - 1205
  • [4] The effects of adolescent prosocial behavior interventions: a meta-analytic review
    Jongho Shin
    ByungYoon Lee
    [J]. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2021, 22 : 565 - 577
  • [6] Prosocial Modeling: A Meta-Analytic Review and Synthesis
    Jung, Haesung
    Seo, Eunjin
    Han, Eunjoo
    Henderson, Marlone D.
    Patall, Erika A.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2020, 146 (08) : 635 - 663
  • [7] Framing effect: A meta-analytic review
    Gambara, H
    Pi, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 22 - 22
  • [8] The generation effect: A meta-analytic review
    Sharon Bertsch
    Bryan J. Pesta
    Richard Wiscott
    Michael A. McDaniel
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2007, 35 : 201 - 210
  • [9] The generation effect: A meta-analytic review
    Bertsch, Sharon
    Pesta, Bryan J.
    Wiscott, Richard
    McDaniel, Mchael A.
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2007, 35 (02) : 201 - 210
  • [10] A meta-analytic review of behavior modeling training
    Taylor, PJ
    Russ-Eft, DF
    Chan, DWL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (04) : 692 - 709