Theory of Mind and Prosocial Behavior in Childhood: A Meta-Analytic Review

被引:255
|
作者
Imuta, Kana [1 ]
Henry, Julie D. [1 ]
Slaughter, Virginia [1 ]
Selcuk, Bilge [2 ]
Ruffman, Ted [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Koc Univ, Dept Psychol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
theory of mind; prosocial behavior; perspective taking; children; meta-analysis; PRO-SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; ROLE-TAKING ABILITY; PERSPECTIVE-TAKING; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PUBLICATION BIAS; EMOTIONAL CONSEQUENCES; ALTRUISTIC BEHAVIOR; P-CURVE; EMPATHY; BELIEF;
D O I
10.1037/dev0000140
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
It has been argued that children who possess an advanced theory of mind (ToM) are more likely to act prosocially, yet the empirical findings are mixed. To address this issue definitively, a meta-analytic integration of all prior literature that met appropriate inclusion criteria was conducted. In total, 76 studies including 6,432 children between 2 and 12 years of age contributed to these analyses. Collapsed across all studies, a significant association emerged (r = .19), indicating that children with higher ToM scores also received higher scores on concurrent measures of prosocial behavior. The magnitude of this effect was similar across ToM assessments requiring identification of others' cognitions versus emotions, and it existed irrespective of whether the ToM measure imposed demands on false belief reasoning or not. The association with ToM was also evident for different subtypes of prosocial behavior (helping, cooperating, comforting). ToM had a similar effect for boys and girls, but was slightly stronger in children aged 6 years or older, relative to their younger peers. Taken together, these findings provide the strongest evidence to date that being able to explicitly consider what other people are thinking and feeling is related to children's tendencies to act prosocially, although the magnitude of the association is relatively weak.
引用
收藏
页码:1192 / 1205
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Links between attachment and theory of mind in childhood: Meta-analytic review
    Szpak, M.
    Bialecka-Pikul, M.
    [J]. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 29 (03) : 653 - 673
  • [2] A meta-analytic review of prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport
    Graupensperger, Scott A.
    Jensen, Ciersti
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 38 : S193 - S194
  • [3] tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review
    Yuan, Bo
    Tolomeo, Serenella
    Yang, Chunliang
    Wang, Ying
    Yu, Rongjun
    [J]. SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 17 (01) : 26 - 42
  • [4] The effects of adolescent prosocial behavior interventions: a meta-analytic review
    Shin, Jongho
    Lee, ByungYoon
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC EDUCATION REVIEW, 2021, 22 (03) : 565 - 577
  • [5] The effects of adolescent prosocial behavior interventions: a meta-analytic review
    Jongho Shin
    ByungYoon Lee
    [J]. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2021, 22 : 565 - 577
  • [6] A Meta-Analytic Review of Age Differences in Theory of Mind
    Henry, Julie D.
    Phillips, Louise H.
    Ruffman, Ted
    Bailey, Phoebe E.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2013, 28 (03) : 826 - 839
  • [8] Prosocial Modeling: A Meta-Analytic Review and Synthesis
    Jung, Haesung
    Seo, Eunjin
    Han, Eunjoo
    Henderson, Marlone D.
    Patall, Erika A.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2020, 146 (08) : 635 - 663
  • [9] A meta-analytic review of the association between theory of mind and aggression
    Ekerim-Akbulut, Muge
    Yavuz-Muren, Melis
    Turunc, Gamze
    Imuta, Kana
    Selcuk, Bilge
    [J]. AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2024, 74
  • [10] STATUS, EXPECTATIONS, AND BEHAVIOR - A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW AND TEST OF THE THEORY
    DRISKELL, JE
    MULLEN, B
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1990, 16 (03) : 541 - 553