Dosimetric comparison of mDCAT and VMAT techniques according to 6MV-FFF and 10MV-FFF energies in patients with single adrenal metastasis

被引:1
|
作者
Durmus, Ismail Faruk [1 ,2 ]
Okumus, Ayse [1 ]
机构
[1] Nisantasi Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Yeni Yuzyil Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gaziosmanpasa Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Adrenal gland SBRT; mDCAT; VMAT; FFF; BODY RADIATION-THERAPY; MODULATED ARC THERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; SBRT; CONFORMITY; EXPERIENCE; PROSTATE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3233/XST-221192
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare dosimetric and radiobiological terms of modified dynamic conformal arc therapy (mDCAT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques using different flattening-filter free (FFF) energies in patients with single adrenal metastasis. METHODS: In this study, plans were prepared for 10 patients drawing on themDCAT andVMAT techniques with 6MV-FFF and 10MV-FFF energies. Target volume doses, biological effective doses (BED), quality indices, Monitor Unit (MU), number of segments, beam-on time and critical organ doses were compared in the plans. RESULTS: Plans with the significantly lower gradient index (GI) and conformity index (CI) values were obtained with 6MVFFF energy VMAT planning (p < 0.05). The higher values were obtained for dose to 95% of internal target volume (ITVD95), ITVD95-BED10 with 10MV-FFF energyVMAT planning, whereas lower results were obtained for high dose spillage (HDS%) values (p < 0,05). With 10MV-FFF energy, HDS% values were 21.1% lower in VMAT plans and 5.6% lower in mDCAT plans compared to 6MV-FFF energy. Plans with approximately 50% fewer segments were obtained in mDCAT plans than VMAT plans (p < 0,05). Beam-on time values with mDCAT was 1.84 times lower when 6MV-FFF energies were analyzed, and 2.11 times lower when 10MV-FFF was analyzed (p < 0,05). Additionally, when 6MV-FFF and 10MV-FFF energies were examined, MU values with mDCAT were 2.1 and 2.5 times lower (p < 0,05). In general, the smaller the target volume size, the greater the differences between MU and beam-on time values mDCAT and VMAT. CONCLUSIONS: The study results implied that VMAT enabled to offer significantly more conformal SBRT plans with steeper dose fall-off beyond the target volume for single adrenal metastasis than the mDCAT, which attained at the cost of significantly higher MU and beam-on times. Especially with 10MV-FFF energy mDCAT plans, low-dose-bath zones can be reduced, and shorter-term treatments can be implemented with large segments. In adrenal gland SBRT, higher effective doses can be achieved with the right energy and technique, critical organ doses can be reduced, thus increasing the possibility of local control of the tumor with low toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:1023 / 1032
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Dosimetric Comparison Between 10MV-FFF and 6MV-FFF for Lung SBRT
    Durmus, I. F.
    Atalay, E. D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TURKISH PHYSICAL SOCIETY 32ND INTERNATIONAL PHYSICS CONGRESS (TPS32), 2017, 1815
  • [2] Dosimetric Comparison of SBRT VMAT Treatment Plans Generated for 6 MV, 6 MV FFF, and 10 MV FFF Photon Beams
    Wilson, D.
    Wang, B.
    Dunlap, N.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3404 - 3404
  • [3] Comparison of the dose distribution of the VMAT radiotherapy technique depending on the beam used: FFF-X10MV and FFF-X15MV
    Plaza, Dominika
    Sroka, Lukasz
    Orzechowska, Klaudia
    Slosarek, Krzysztof
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2023, 28 (05) : 654 - 660
  • [4] Validation and Clinical Implementation of VMAT Liver SBRT on 6MV-FFF O-Ring Halcyon Linac
    Tackett, T.
    Webster, A.
    Bernard, M.
    Kudrimoti, M.
    Pokhrel, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [5] A comparison of the efficiency of delivery between 10 MV FFF VMAT versus conventional 6 MV VMAT for lung SABR and the impact on a busy radiotherapy department
    Moore, K.
    LUNG CANCER, 2014, 83 : S61 - S61
  • [6] Surface Dose and Build-Up Dose Comparison of 6MV and 10MV Flattened with 6MV FFF and 10MV FFF Photon Beams with Different Detectors
    Nambiraj, Arunai
    Sigamani, Ashokkumar
    Kaviarasu, K.
    Rajesh, T.
    Karthikeyan, S.
    Subramanian, Narayanan
    Meerza, Kazem
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3502 - 3502
  • [7] On the Use of 6MV-FFF Beam in the Treatment of Hypofractionated Left Breast Patients Using DIBH-CT
    Snyder, J.
    Molloy, J.
    Bernard, M.
    Pokhrel, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E420 - E420
  • [8] Feasibility of Using 6MV-FFF Halcyon RDS for Single-Isocenter/Two-Lesion Lung SBRT
    Webster, A.
    Visak, J.
    Bernard, M.
    McGarry, R.
    Kudrimoti, M.
    Pokhrel, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [9] Dosimetric influence of Flattening Filter (FF) and Flattening Filter Free (FFF) 6 and 10 MV photon beams on Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) planning in case of prostate carcinoma
    Cakir, A.
    Akgun, Z.
    Saglam, E. Kaytan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (02): : 253 - 263
  • [10] Treatment of Gynecological Cancer Patients with Extended Fields (EF) Via Dual-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Using 6MV-FFF O-Ring Halcyon Linac
    Pokhrel, D.
    Randall, M.
    Fabian, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)