Total hip arthroplasty: to cross-match or not to cross-match an evidence-based, cost-effective and safe protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Sivardeen, K. A. Ziali [1 ]
Kaleel, Sahadu Saajid [2 ]
Paul, Weaver [3 ]
Chandran, Prakash [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Orthopaed Hosp, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Luton & Dunstable Hosp, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed, Luton, Beds, England
[3] Alexandra Hosp, Blood Transfus Serv, Redditch B98 7UB, England
关键词
blood transfusion; total hip replacement;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-007-0268-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purpose Most centres cross-match between 2 and 4 units of blood pre-operatively for primary total hip arthroplasties (THA), but is this necessary? We aimed to quantify the use of blood after THA in our centre and to advocate a safe, evidence-based protocol for its use. Method A retrospective analysis of blood transfusion requirements of 169 consecutive total hip arthroplasties over a 12-month period. Results Out of the 460 units of blood that were cross-matched only 175 units (38%) were used. Only 22 of the 175 units (13%) were transfused on the day of surgery. No patients needed intra-operative transfusion or blood urgently. Inference We conclude that blood should not be routinely cross-matched for primary THA. We advocate a policy of only group and saving of blood in the majority of patients undergoing primary THA and cross matching blood if and when necessary. However, the 1-2% of patients who have antibodies present in the blood as per group and screen should have blood cross-matched and available pre-operatively. We believe this protocol, is safe and cost effective, resulting in a significant saving in cost, without compromising safety.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 109
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The CDS Cross-Match Service
    Boch, Thomas
    Pineau, Francois-Xavier
    Derriere, Sebastien
    ASTRONOMICAL DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS XXI, 2012, 461 : 291 - 294
  • [12] OMITTING THE ANTIGLOBULIN CROSS-MATCH
    SHULMAN, IA
    NELSON, JM
    SAXENA, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1993, 83 (03) : 521 - 522
  • [13] THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MINOR CROSS-MATCH
    JENNINGS, ER
    HINDMARSH, C
    THROMBOSIS ET DIATHESIS HAEMORRHAGICA, 1958, 2 (02): : 183 - 184
  • [14] REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COMPUTER CROSS-MATCH
    BUTCH, SH
    JUDD, WJ
    TRANSFUSION, 1994, 34 (02) : 187 - 187
  • [15] AVOIDING CROSS-MATCH MISMATCH
    不详
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1977, 9 (01) : 101 - 101
  • [16] Flow cytometry cross-match
    Brando, B
    Sommaruga, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 40 : 53 - 62
  • [17] The use of the computer cross-match
    Engelfriet, CP
    Reesink, HW
    Krusius, T
    Wendel, S
    Fontao-Wendel, R
    Hoffer, I
    Medgyesi, G
    Tadokoro, K
    Pisacka, M
    Kühnl, P
    Schwartz, DWM
    Mayr, WR
    Schönitzer, D
    Lin, CK
    James, V
    Castel, A
    Hazenberg, CAM
    Letowska, M
    Solheim, BG
    Guerts, M
    Ghosh, S
    Flanagan, P
    Epstein, J
    Säfwenberg, J
    Riccardi, D
    Sirchia, G
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2001, 80 (03) : 184 - 192
  • [18] TOWARDS THE COMPUTER CROSS-MATCH
    GEORGSEN, J
    LILLEVANG, ST
    KRISTENSEN, T
    TRANSFUSION, 1995, 35 (10) : A21 - A21
  • [19] Comparison of Luminex Based Cross-Match (LXM) and Flow Cytometric Cross-Match (FXM) Results in Kidney Transplantation.
    Pelletier, Ronald P.
    Adams, Patrick
    DiPaula, Nicholas
    Rearick, Annette
    Hadley, Gregg
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 : 487 - 487
  • [20] IS THE INDIRECT ANTIGLOBULIN CROSS-MATCH JUSTIFIED
    PETERSON, DM
    ROXBY, DJ
    SESHADRI, R
    PATHOLOGY, 1987, 19 (02) : 121 - 123