Adaptively Managing Wildlife for Climate Change: A Fuzzy Logic Approach

被引:9
|
作者
Prato, Tony [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, CARES, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Adaptive management; Wildlife impacts; Climate change; Fuzzy logic; ECOSYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY; PROTECTED AREAS; MISSOURI RIVER; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM; CONSERVATION; VARIABILITY; IMPACTS; SETS;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-011-9648-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wildlife managers have little or no control over climate change. However, they may be able to alleviate potential adverse impacts of future climate change by adaptively managing wildlife for climate change. In particular, wildlife managers can evaluate the efficacy of compensatory management actions (CMAs) in alleviating potential adverse impacts of future climate change on wildlife species using probability-based or fuzzy decision rules. Application of probability-based decision rules requires managers to specify certain probabilities, which is not possible when they are uncertain about the relationships between observed and true ecological conditions for a species. Under such uncertainty, the efficacy of CMAs can be evaluated and the best CMA selected using fuzzy decision rules. The latter are described and demonstrated using three constructed cases that assume: (1) a single ecological indicator (e.g., population size for a species) in a single time period; (2) multiple ecological indicators for a species in a single time period; and (3) multiple ecological conditions for a species in multiple time periods.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 149
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of climate change on flood risk with urban resilience perspective using fuzzy logic model
    Ullah, Ibrar
    Kovacs, Gabor
    Lenner, Tibor
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2025, 18 (02)
  • [42] Climate change as a wildlife health threat: a scoping review
    Greening, Sabrina S.
    Pascarosa, Lucie R.
    Munster, Avery L.
    Gagne, Roderick B.
    Ellis, Julie C.
    BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2025, 21 (01)
  • [43] Climate change as a global amplifier of human–wildlife conflict
    Briana Abrahms
    Neil H. Carter
    T. J. Clark-Wolf
    Kaitlyn M. Gaynor
    Erik Johansson
    Alex McInturff
    Anna C. Nisi
    Kasim Rafiq
    Leigh West
    Nature Climate Change, 2023, 13 : 224 - 234
  • [44] Human-wildlife conflict under climate change
    Abrahms, Briana
    SCIENCE, 2021, 373 (6554) : 484 - 485
  • [45] How Emotion Trumps Logic in Climate Change Risk Perception: Exploring the Affective Heuristic Among Wildlife Science Students
    Stevenson, Kathryn T.
    Lashley, Marcus A.
    Chitwood, M. Colter
    Peterson, M. Nils
    Moorman, Christopher E.
    HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF WILDLIFE, 2015, 20 (06) : 501 - 513
  • [46] A PLANNED APPROACH TO MANAGING CHANGE
    GARRISON, TJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1983, 40 (08): : 1357 - 1359
  • [47] Managing Climate Change: Shifting Roles for NGOs in the Climate Negotiations
    Pandey, Chandra Lal
    ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2015, 24 (06) : 799 - 824
  • [48] Managing climate change in cities: Will climate action plans work?
    Stone, Brian
    Vargo, Jason
    Habeeb, Dana
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2012, 107 (03) : 263 - 271
  • [49] Sustaining Ecological Integrity with Respect to Climate Change: A Fuzzy Adaptive Management Approach
    Tony Prato
    Environmental Management, 2010, 45 : 1344 - 1351
  • [50] A novel approach to determining change of caloric intake requirement based on fuzzy logic methodology
    Nakandala, Dilupa
    Lau, H. C. W.
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2012, 36 : 51 - 58