Escalation of commitment in innovative R&D project: A new perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Ai, MY [1 ]
Qi, ZY [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Management, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
关键词
escalation of commitment; R&D project; termination decision; cognitive bias; group polarization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many people has seen it: the R&D project that takes on such life of its own that it becomes virtually impossible to stop even though all signs point to its ultimate failure. The escalation of commitment in innovative R&D project is even more serious. Based on bounded rationality assumption, individual decision maker and decision group are taken as different unit of analysis and tries to explain why innovative R&D project is hard to terminate. In true life, individual decision is a complex process which is affects by emotional and irrational factors. The cognitive and heuristics bias involving representativeness, anchoring, overconfidence, loss aversion, and regret aversion influence man's decision from different aspect and extent. In group decision, diffused responsibility makes individual group members to pursue private interests by the way of the success of innovative R&D project and they cannot be held responsible for the failure of a group decision. Persuasive arguments make individuals afraid to speak up when they disagree. Thus, group polarization is engendered and a risky decision-continue the project- is made. Individual biased initial judgment and group risk polarization form and strengthen escalation of commitment.
引用
收藏
页码:2308 / 2313
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Framework for understanding commitment in the R&D organization
    Starling, Grover
    [J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 1991, 7 (3-4): : 251 - 265
  • [22] R&D Project Valuation Considering Changes of Economic Environment: A Case of a Pharmaceutical R&D Project
    Park, Jung Ho
    Shin, Kwangsoo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [23] Linking technology selection and R&D project selection in innovative product development networks
    Torkkeli, M
    Koivunieni, J
    Ojanen, V
    Tuominen, M
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY: GROWTH THROUGH BUSINESS INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2003, : 431 - 446
  • [24] Classification of R&D projects and selection of R&D project management concept
    Kuchta, Dorota
    Skowron, Dorota
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2016, 46 (05) : 831 - 841
  • [25] The value of a 'failed' R&D project: an emerging evaluation framework for building innovative capabilities
    Elmquist, Maria
    Le Masson, Pascal
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2009, 39 (02) : 136 - 152
  • [26] An integrated method for collaborative R&D project selection: Supporting innovative research teams
    Feng, Bo
    Ma, Jian
    Fan, Zhi-Ping
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (05) : 5532 - 5543
  • [27] Modified, Stakeholders Perspective based DEA Approach in IT and R&D Project Ranking
    Kuchta, Dorota
    Skorupka, Dariusz
    Duchaczek, Artur
    Kowacka, Magdalena
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, VOL 2 (ICEIS), 2016, : 158 - 165
  • [28] Analysis of pharma R&D productivity - a new perspective needed
    Schuhmacher, Alexander
    Hinder, Markus
    Stein, Alexander von Stegmann und
    Hartl, Dominik
    Gassmann, Oliver
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2023, 28 (10)
  • [29] Role of professional autonomy and project commitment in the Korean government-funded R&D projects
    Baek, Seung Chul
    Lee, Duk Hee
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2022, 49 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [30] Crafting R&D project portfolios
    MacMillan, IC
    McGrath, RG
    [J]. RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2002, 45 (05) : 48 - 59