Escalation of commitment in innovative R&D project: A new perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Ai, MY [1 ]
Qi, ZY [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Management, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
关键词
escalation of commitment; R&D project; termination decision; cognitive bias; group polarization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many people has seen it: the R&D project that takes on such life of its own that it becomes virtually impossible to stop even though all signs point to its ultimate failure. The escalation of commitment in innovative R&D project is even more serious. Based on bounded rationality assumption, individual decision maker and decision group are taken as different unit of analysis and tries to explain why innovative R&D project is hard to terminate. In true life, individual decision is a complex process which is affects by emotional and irrational factors. The cognitive and heuristics bias involving representativeness, anchoring, overconfidence, loss aversion, and regret aversion influence man's decision from different aspect and extent. In group decision, diffused responsibility makes individual group members to pursue private interests by the way of the success of innovative R&D project and they cannot be held responsible for the failure of a group decision. Persuasive arguments make individuals afraid to speak up when they disagree. Thus, group polarization is engendered and a risky decision-continue the project- is made. Individual biased initial judgment and group risk polarization form and strengthen escalation of commitment.
引用
收藏
页码:2308 / 2313
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] International collaborations in innovative R&D: An Indian perspective
    Katti, Sanjeev
    Sapre, Ajit
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [2] INTERSHIP: A new R&D project
    不详
    [J]. NAVAL ARCHITECT, 2004, : 4 - 4
  • [3] New R&D project for AquaCarotene
    不详
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2000, 10 (01) : 13 - 13
  • [4] R&D project selection versus R&D project generation
    Bordley, RF
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1998, 45 (04) : 407 - 413
  • [5] R&D project
    不详
    [J]. CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING QUARTERLY, 1997, 11 (01) : 61 - 61
  • [6] The contribution of project analysis to an R&D project at an industrial R&D center
    Bruggink, PR
    [J]. INTERFACES, 1997, 27 (02) : 107 - 108
  • [7] Spillovers and strategic commitment in R&D
    Liu, Huizhong
    Tian, Jingwen
    [J]. THEORY AND DECISION, 2024, 96 (03) : 477 - 501
  • [8] Spillovers and strategic commitment in R&D
    Huizhong Liu
    Jingwen Tian
    [J]. Theory and Decision, 2024, 96 : 477 - 501
  • [9] New developments from the TORCH R&D project
    Jones, T.
    Bhasin, S.
    Blake, T.
    Brook, N. H.
    Cicala, M. F.
    Conneely, T.
    Cussans, D.
    van Dijk, M. W. U.
    Forty, R.
    Frei, C.
    Gabriel, E. P. M.
    Gao, R.
    Gershon, T.
    Gys, T.
    Hadavizadeh, T.
    Hancock, H.
    Harnew, N.
    Kreps, M.
    Milnes, J.
    Piedigrossi, D.
    Rademacker, J.
    Smallwood, J. C.
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2023, 1045
  • [10] Stopping an R&D project
    Kumar, Vinod
    Persaud, Aditha N.S.
    Kumar, Uma
    [J]. IEEE Potentials, 1997, 16 (2 Suppl): : 13 - 16