Readability and quality of online information for patients pertaining to revision knee arthroplasty: An objective analysis

被引:9
|
作者
Murphy, Ben [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Irwin, Shane [1 ,2 ]
Condon, Finbarr [1 ,2 ]
Kennedy, Cian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
[2] Croom Orthopaed Hosp, Limerick, Ireland
[3] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Core Surg Trainee ST2, St Stephen Green, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
Revision knee arthroplasty; Patient education; Health literacy; Reading level; Orthopaedic surgery; HEALTH LITERACY; OF-LIFE; INTERNET; SURGERY; HIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Modern patients use the internet more frequently for their health information. Our aim was to assess the quality and readability of online patient education materials relating to revision knee arthroplasty. We hypothesised that this information would be too difficult to read for the average patient and of a lesser quality than desired.Method: A search of the top 50 results on 3 search engines (Google, Bing, Yahoo) was completed (MeSH "revision knee arthroplasty", "revision knee replacement"). Readability of these websites was calculated using a specialised website, www.readable.com to produce 3 scores (Gunning-Fog (GF), Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade (FKG). Quality was assessed using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria and the Health On the Net (HON) code toolbar extension.Results: 89 unique websites were identified. Mean FRE was 44.01 +/- 11.05. The mean GF was 12.01 +/- 2.94. The mean FKG level was 10.06 +/- 1.95. As per the FRE score, no webpage was pitched at or below a sixth grade reading level. The GF index identified only 3 websites (3.4%) at 6th grade reading level. As per FKG score, most webpages (n = 58, 65.2%) found themselves in the 10th grade reading level and above. Four websites (4.5%) displayed a HONcode certificate. However, all had expired. Most websites (n = 34, 38.2%) didn't meet any of the JAMA criteria.Conclusion: The reading level of these materials is too high for the average patient and of a low quality. Given what we know about levels of health literacy and their relationship with patient outcomes, it is vital that we address these deficiencies promptly.(c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:E366 / E370
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Revision total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of the quality and readability of information on the internet
    Sheridan, Gerard Anthony
    O'Brien, Carl
    Masri, Bassam A.
    Duncan, Clive P.
    Garbuz, Donald S.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 11 (02): : 82 - 89
  • [2] An Objective Analysis of Quality and Readability of Online Information for Patients seeking Cosmetic Surgery Abroad
    McMahon, M. E.
    Gressmann, K.
    Martin-Smith, J. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2023, 81 : 88 - 90
  • [3] Readability and Quality of Online Information on Osteoarthritis: An Objective Analysis With Historic Comparison
    Murray, Kieran Edward
    Murray, Timothy Eanna
    O'Rourke, Anna Caroline
    Low, Candice
    Veale, Douglas James
    [J]. INTERACTIVE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (03):
  • [4] An objective analysis of quality and readability of online information on COVID-19
    N. E. Wrigley Kelly
    K. E. Murray
    C. McCarthy
    D. B. O’Shea
    [J]. Health and Technology, 2021, 11 : 1093 - 1099
  • [5] An objective analysis of quality and readability of online information on COVID-19
    Wrigley Kelly, N. E.
    Murray, K. E.
    McCarthy, C.
    O'Shea, D. B.
    [J]. HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 11 (05) : 1093 - 1099
  • [6] Online resources for information on shoulder arthroplasty: an assessment of quality and readability
    Fares, Mohamad Y.
    Singh, Jaspal
    Vadhera, Amar S.
    Koa, Jonathan
    Boufadel, Peter
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    [J]. CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2023, 26 (03): : 238 - 244
  • [7] AN ANALYSIS OF THE QUALITY AND READABILITY OF ONLINE INFORMATION FOR OSTEOARTHRITIS
    Murray, Kieran
    Murray, Timothy
    Low, Candice
    O'Rourke, Anna
    Veale, Douglas J.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 59
  • [8] Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information
    Broderick, James M.
    McCarthy, Andrea
    Hogan, Niall
    [J]. KNEE, 2021, 28 : 139 - 150
  • [9] Readability of online health information pertaining to migraine and headache in the UK
    Atherton, Kate
    Forshaw, Mark J.
    Kidd, Tara M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 17 (02) : 117 - 125
  • [10] Quality and Readability of Online Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cysts
    Oman, Sven P.
    Zaver, Himesh
    Corral, Juan E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S58 - S60