FoldX as Protein Engineering Tool: Better Than Random Based Approaches?

被引:151
|
作者
Buss, Oliver [1 ]
Rudat, Jens [1 ]
Ochsenreither, Katrin [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Proc Engn Life Sci, Sect Tech Biol 2, Engler Bunte Ring 3, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
FoldX; Fold-X; Thermostability; Protein stabilization; Protein engineering; Enzyme engineering; DIRECTED EVOLUTION; SUPEROXIDE-DISMUTASE; THERMAL-STABILITY; IMPROVED THERMOSTABILITY; TEMPERATURE ADAPTATION; SATURATION MUTAGENESIS; ENZYMATIC-PROPERTIES; SEQUENCE STATISTICS; GLUCOSE BIOSENSORS; PREDICTING CHANGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.csbj.2018.01.002
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Improving protein stability is an important goal for basic research as well as for clinical and industrial applications but no commonly accepted and widely used strategy for efficient engineering is known. Beside random approaches like error prone PCR or physical techniques to stabilize proteins, e.g. by immobilization, in silico approaches are gaining more attention to apply target-oriented mutagenesis. In this review different algorithms for the prediction of beneficial mutation sites to enhance protein stability are summarized and the advantages and disadvantages of FoldX are highlighted. The question whether the prediction of mutation sites by the algorithm FoldX is more accurate than random based approaches is addressed. (C) 2018 Buss et al. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Automated Collaborative Requirements Engineering Tool for Better Validation of Requirements
    Moketar, Nor Aiza
    Kamalrudin, Massila
    Sidek, Safiah
    Robinson, Mark
    Grundy, John
    [J]. 2016 31ST IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ASE), 2016, : 864 - 869
  • [22] Why breast cancer signatures are no better than random signatures explained
    Bin Goh, Wilson Wen
    Wong, Limsoon
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2018, 23 (11) : 1818 - 1823
  • [23] Active learning for clinical text classification: is it better than random sampling?
    Figueroa, Rosa L.
    Zeng-Treitler, Qing
    Ngo, Long H.
    Goryachev, Sergey
    Wiechmann, Eduardo P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2012, 19 (05) : 809 - 816
  • [24] IS SOLUBLE PROTEIN A BETTER PHYSIOLOGICAL BASE THAN CHLOROPHYLL
    LOOMIS, RS
    [J]. ACTA AGRONOMICA ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE, 1971, 20 (3-4): : 448 - &
  • [25] IS THIS BEEF SOY PROTEIN COMBO BETTER THAN BEEF
    不详
    [J]. FOOD ENGINEERING, 1984, 56 (11): : 71 - 71
  • [26] Protein transport: Two translocons are better than one
    Robb, A
    Brown, JD
    [J]. MOLECULAR CELL, 2001, 8 (03) : 484 - 486
  • [27] Random mutagenesis of amelogenin for engineering protein nanoparticles
    Bonde, Johan
    Buelow, Leif
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2015, 112 (07) : 1319 - 1326
  • [28] Microscopic Model-Based RL Approaches for Traffic Signal Control Generalize Better than Model-Free RL Approaches
    Jaggi, Parth
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Carrara, Nicolas
    Sanner, Scott
    Abdulhai, Baher
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (ITSC), 2021, : 2525 - 2532
  • [29] STUDY APPROACHES, PROCESSES AND STRATEGIES - ARE 3 PERSPECTIVES BETTER THAN ONE
    SPETH, C
    BROWN, R
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 58 : 247 - 257
  • [30] Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy: Is it better than transperitoneal laparoscopic and open surgical approaches?
    Sabbagh, R
    Barrieras, DJ
    Walsh, P
    Houle, AM
    Lallier, M
    Lapointe, SP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 298 - 298