Reducing post-extubation failure rates in very preterm infants: is BiPAP better than CPAP?

被引:6
|
作者
Capasso, Letizia [1 ]
Borrelli, Angela Carla [1 ]
Cerullo, Julia [1 ]
Caiazzo, Maria Angela [1 ]
Coppola, Clara [1 ]
Palma, Marta [1 ]
Raimondi, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Federico II, Dept Translat Med Sci, Div Neonatol, Via Pansini 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
来源
关键词
BiPAP; CPAP; preterm neonates; RDS; non-invasive respiratory support; POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2020.1749256
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is currently used in neonates after mechanical ventilation though it may occasionally be associated with air leaks syndromes or it may fail to support the baby. The pressure difference offered by bilevel continuous positive distending pressure (BiPAP) respect to CPAP may be an advantage to the spontaneously breathing patient. In this study, we compared the efficacy of CPAP and BiPAP in the firstweek post-extubation in a series of very preterm infants. Methods: Inborn neonates less than 30 weeks of gestational age who were intubated shortly after birth from January 2011 to December 2017 were enrolled in a retrospective study. The attending clinician assessed the patients for non-invasive respiratory support readiness and allocated them to CPAP (PEEP 4-6 cmH(2)O) or BiPAP (PEEP 4-5 cmH(2)O, rate 10-40; Thigh 0.7-1.2; upper-pressure level 8-10 cmH(2)O). Both techniques were compared for preventing extubation failure within 7 days from extubation as defined per local protocol (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes were: definitive failure of extubation, pneumothorax during non-invasive respiratory support, periventricular leukomalacia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, sepsis, patent ductus arteriosus and retinopathy of prematurity at discharge. Results: We enrolled 134 neonates; the CPAP group included 89 babies while 45 received BiPAP. Patients did not differ for their general characteristics (EG, antenatal steroids, incidence of SGA, maternal hypertension, surfactant replacement therapy). Short term extubation failure was significantly higher in the former group (23/89 in CPAP vs 5/45 in BiPAP; p = .005). No infant developed air leak syndrome. Secondary outcomes were comparable between groups. Multivariate analysis showed that on the whole population the extubation failure was correlated to the insurgence of late-onset sepsis. Conclusion: BiPAP safely reduced early extubation failure compared to CPAP in our cohort of very preterm neonates within 7 days from extubation.
引用
收藏
页码:1272 / 1277
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Decreased incidence of post-extubation respiratory failure in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants: A randomized trial of nasopharyngeal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (NP-SIMV) versus nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure (TP-CPAP)
    Friedlich, P
    Lecart, C
    Posen, R
    Ramicone, E
    Chan, L
    Ramanathan, R
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1999, 45 (04) : 197A - 197A
  • [32] Comparison of Bubble CPAP Devices Using RAM Cannula for Extubation Failure in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Randomized and Cohort Studies
    Claassen, Colleen C.
    Hillman, Noah H.
    Brown, Kimberly
    Williams, Howard L.
    Strand, Marya L.
    NEONATOLOGY, 2019, 115 (01) : 28 - 35
  • [33] Bubble vs Conventional Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Prevention of Extubation Failure in Preterm Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Pilot Study
    Sucheta Yadav
    Anu Thukral
    M. Jeeva Sankar
    V. Sreenivas
    Ashok K. Deorari
    Vinod K. Paul
    Ramesh Agarwal
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2012, 79 : 1163 - 1168
  • [34] Bubble vs Conventional Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Prevention of Extubation Failure in Preterm Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Pilot Study
    Yadav, Sucheta
    Thukral, Anu
    Sankar, M. Jeeva
    Sreenivas, V.
    Deorari, Ashok K.
    Paul, Vinod K.
    Agarwal, Ramesh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2012, 79 (09): : 1163 - 1168
  • [35] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Post-extubation Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Infant Flow Driver Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Gupta, Samir
    Sinha, Sunil K.
    Tin, Win
    Donn, Steven M.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2009, 154 (05): : 645 - 650
  • [36] A randomized controlled trial of two methods of delivering post-extubation nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to infants <1000g:: Binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs
    Davis, PG
    Davies, MW
    Faber, BM
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2000, 47 (04) : 395A - 395A
  • [37] Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Post-extubation Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Yengkhom, Rameshwor
    Suryawanshi, Pradeep
    Gupta, Bhvya
    Deshpande, Sujata
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS, 2021, 67 (01)
  • [38] Effectiveness of a home-based, post-discharge early intervention program for very preterm infants in reducing parental stress: a randomized controlled trial
    Fan, Juan
    He, Ruiyun
    He, Shasha
    Yang, Mei
    Tao, Xiaojun
    Zhou, Mei
    Gao, Xiong
    Yu, Weihong
    Wang, Jianhui
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [39] Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
    Jasani, Bonny
    Nanavati, Ruchi
    Kabra, Nandkishor
    Rajdeo, Shankar
    Bhandari, Vineet
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (10): : 1546 - 1551
  • [40] Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) vs noninvasive high frequency oscillation ventilation (NHFOV) as post-extubation support in preterm neonates: protocol for an assessor-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
    Shi, Yuan
    De Luca, Daniele
    Yuan, Shi
    Wang, Jianhui
    Long, Chen
    Zhu, Xingwang
    Li, Huanhuan
    Zhong, Xiaoyun
    Song, Sijie
    Lan, Zhang
    Li, Li
    Liu, Huiqiang
    Tong, Xiaomei
    Xu, Xiaojing
    Cui, LiFeng
    Yi, Ming
    Peng, Zhoujie
    Jie, Li
    Chen, Dongmei
    Zhang, Weifeng
    Lin, Xinzhu
    Bin, Wang
    Huang, Weimin
    Bi, Guangliang
    He, Shaoru
    Liu, Yumei
    Jie, Yang
    Gao Weiwei
    Liang, Wuhua
    Wu, Yaoxun
    Pan, Xinnian
    Wei, Qiufen
    Chen, Yujun
    Wei, Bingmei
    Liu, Ling
    Zheng, Xinghui
    Xu, Ding
    Fan, Wang
    Yi, Bin
    Shi, Jingyun
    Li, Yuning
    Jiang, Li
    Jiang, Chunming
    Tang, Chenghe
    Xiong, Hong
    Sun, Huiqing
    Kang, Wenqing
    Liu, Dapeng
    Xu, Falin
    Xing Kaihui
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2019, 19 (1)