Proposal for a 'European scoring system for laparoscopic operations in urology'

被引:87
|
作者
Guillonneau, B
Abbou, CC
Doublet, JD
Gaston, R
Janetschek, G
Mandressi, A
Rassweiler, JJ
Vallancien, G
机构
[1] European Society of Uro-Technology, European UnionEuropean Society of Uro-Technology, European Union
[2] Association Française d'Urologie, European UnionEuropean Society of Uro-Technology, European Union
[3] European Association of Urology - Guidelines Section, European UnionEuropean Society of Uro-Technology
[4] Laparoscopy Working Group of the German Urologic Association, European UnionEuropean Society of Uro-Technology, European Union
[5] Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, F-75014 Paris, 42, boulevard Jourdan
关键词
laparoscopy; complications; urology; classification;
D O I
10.1159/000049742
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose. To propose a scoring system of difficulties for the most currently performed laparoscopic procedures in urology. Materials and Methods: Each current laparoscopic procedure has been evaluated according to three different criteria: technical difficulty, operative risk and the attention required. Each criterion is scored from 1 (minimal impact of the criteria) to 7 (maximal impact of the criteria). The sum of the 3 criteria is used to classify each operation according to an increasing level of global difficulty, classified into 6 levels: easy (E: sum of criteria between 3 and 5), slightly difficult (SD: sum of criteria between 6 and 8), fairly difficult (FD: sum of criteria between 9 and 11), difficult (D: sum of criteria between 12 and 14), very difficult (VD: sum of criteria between 15 and 17), extremely difficult (ED: sum of criteria greater than 18). Results: Procedures currently performed by laparoscopy have been selected for evaluation according to the above criteria, and retrospectively validated by European experts in laparoscopic urology according to their experience and the international literature. Conclusion:This proposal of a scoring scale system is a basis for discussion, teaching and learning of urological laparoscopy. By necessity, this scale is evolving and will be regularly reconsidered and updated every 5 years. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 6
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of Laparoscopic Suturing Skills of Urology Residents: A Pan-European Study
    Kroeze, Stephanie G. C.
    Mayer, Erik K.
    Chopra, Samarth
    Aggarwal, Rajesh
    Darzi, Ara
    Patel, Anup
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (05) : 865 - 872
  • [22] LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURES IN UROLOGY
    DAS, S
    UPTON, JD
    AMAR, AD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 137 (04): : A177 - A177
  • [23] Laparoscopic training in urology
    Katz, R
    Hoznek, A
    Antiphon, P
    Salomon, L
    De la Taille, A
    Borkowski, T
    Chopin, D
    Abbou, CC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04): : 386 - 386
  • [24] Mentoring in laparoscopic urology
    Sullivan, Mark E.
    Jones, Adam
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 99 (01) : 7 - 8
  • [25] Laparoscopic approaches in urology
    Abdelmaksoud, A
    Biyani, CS
    Bagheri, F
    Janetschek, G
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 (02) : 244 - 249
  • [26] Training in laparoscopic urology
    Laguna, MP
    de Reijke, TM
    Wijkstra, H
    de la Rosette, J
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2006, 16 (02) : 65 - 70
  • [27] Review of laparoscopic urology
    B.C. Koo
    N.A. Burgess
    M. Rhodes
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2003, 17 : 3 - 11
  • [28] Current attitudes to the laparoscopic bariatric operations among European surgeons
    Rivas, H
    Martínez, JL
    Delgado, S
    Vidal, J
    Lacy, AM
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2004, 14 (09) : 1247 - 1251
  • [29] Complications in laparoscopic urology
    Martin Burchardt
    Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2008, 26 : 521 - 522
  • [30] LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN UROLOGY
    BOWSHER, WG
    COSTELLO, AJ
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1992, 156 (02) : 140 - 140