Reflexivity, stress, and unlearning in the new product development team: the moderating effect of procedural justice

被引:51
|
作者
Lee, Les Tien-Shang [1 ]
Sukoco, Badri Munir [2 ]
机构
[1] Kun Shan Univ, Dept Int Trade, Yung Kang 701, Tainan Hsien, Taiwan
[2] Airlangga Univ, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Management, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia
关键词
INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; ANTECEDENTS; OUTCOMES; PROJECT; MODEL; CONSEQUENCES; CREATIVITY; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00645.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The success of new product development (NPD) depends on a team's abilities to integrate, build, and reconfigure internal and external competences and the flexibility to address rapidly changing environments. To develop innovative products it is desirable that these processes should not be constrained by current beliefs and routines. NPD teams therefore need to engage in an unlearning process to overcome any resistance to new ideas and to facilitate a fresh approach. The paper recognizes that the controlled experience of stress plays a part in unlearning (e.g., confusion about technology or market change can encourage changes) and argues that teams should systematically reflect on the progress they are making in projects and in unlearning. The fairness of procedures used by the management moderates the proposed relationships. Two hundred and ninety eight team members and 77 NPD team leaders participated in the study. The results indicate that team reflexivity positively influences unlearning and product innovation, while team stress has a negative effect. The perceived fairness of management procedures strengthens the positive effects of team reflexivity on unlearning and product innovation, and reduces negative effect of team stress.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 423
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Mediating Effect of Team-Level Knowledge Creation on Organizational Procedural Justice and Team Performance Improvement
    Kang, Ingu
    Song, Ji
    Kim, Woocheol
    [J]. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT QUARTERLY, 2012, 25 (02) : 43 - 64
  • [32] Moderating the Interaction Between Procedural Justice and Decision Frame: The Counterbalancing Effect of Personality Traits
    Sasaki, Hiroyuki
    Hayashi, Yoichiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 147 (02): : 125 - 151
  • [33] Team Foresight in New Product Development Projects
    Atif Açıkgöz
    Ayşe Günsel
    Cemil Kuzey
    Halil Zaim
    [J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2016, 25 : 289 - 323
  • [34] Team Foresight in New Product Development Projects
    Acikgoz, Atif
    Gunsel, Ayse
    Kuzey, Cemil
    Zaim, Halil
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2016, 25 (02) : 289 - 323
  • [35] ORGANIZING FOR EFFECTIVE NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT - THE MODERATING ROLE OF PRODUCT INNOVATIVENESS
    OLSON, EM
    WALKER, OC
    RUEKERT, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1995, 59 (01) : 48 - 62
  • [36] The Relationship Between Unlearning and Innovation Ambidexterity with the Performance of New Product Development Teams
    Atif Açıkgöz
    Irem Demirkan
    Gary P. Latham
    Cemil Kuzey
    [J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2021, 30 : 945 - 982
  • [37] The Effect of Team Collectivism on Performance and Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Role of Peer Procedural Justice
    Ozen, Arzu Sert
    Elci, Meral
    [J]. TURK PSIKOLOJI DERGISI, 2019, 34 : 71 - 92
  • [38] Investor Reactions to New Product Development Failures: The Moderating Role of Product Development Stage
    Urbig, Diemo
    Buerger, Robin
    Patzelt, Holger
    Schweizer, Lars
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2013, 39 (04) : 985 - 1015
  • [39] The Relationship Between Unlearning and Innovation Ambidexterity with the Performance of New Product Development Teams
    Acikgoz, Atif
    Demirkan, Irem
    Latham, Gary P.
    Kuzey, Cemil
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2021, 30 (04) : 945 - 982
  • [40] The Effect of Transactive Memory Systems on Job Stress of New Product Development Teams: Moderating Effects of Project Complexity and Technological Turbulence
    Carbonell, Pilar
    Rodriguez-Escudero, Ana, I
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (04) : 1432 - 1446