How Can Perceived Autonomy Support Influence Enrollment in Elective Physical Education? A Prospective Study

被引:0
|
作者
Shen, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Div Kinesiol Hlth & Sport Study, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
attitudes; intention; high school students; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; STUDENTS; MOTIVATION; TEACHERS; SCHOOL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This prospective study was designed to investigate the influence of high students' perceived teacher autonomy support 177 mandatory physical education on then intention and actual enrollment in elective physical education Participants in chided 545 ninth grade students enrolled in three suburban high schools in a major midwestern metropolitan area A series of hypothesized models related to autonomy support within the Theory of Planned Behavior were tested Structural equation modeling results demonstrated that perceived autonomy support provided by teachers in mandatory physical education could predict elective physical education enrollment indirectly via the mediation of attitudes and intention in the Theory of Planned Behavior Providing support for students' autonomy in physical education may hold potential promise for enhancing their future physical activity engagement
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 465
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Autonomy support, motivational climate, enjoyment and perceived competence in physical education: Impact of a hybrid teaching games for understanding/sport education unit
    Gil-Arias, Alexander
    Claver, Fernando
    Praxedes, Alba
    Del Villar, Fernando
    Harvey, Stephen
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2020, 26 (01) : 36 - 53
  • [22] Proposal for Modeling Motivational Strategies for Autonomy Support in Physical Education
    Antonio Moreno-Murcia, Juan
    Barrachina-Peris, Julio
    Ballester Campillo, Manuel
    Estevez, Estefania
    Huescar, Elisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (14)
  • [23] Autonomy support in Physical Education: Evidence to improve the teaching process
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Luis
    Aibar Solana, Alberto
    Sevil-Serrano, Javier
    Almolda Tomas, Francisco J.
    Julian Clemente, Jose A.
    CULTURA CIENCIA Y DEPORTE, 2015, 10 (29): : 103 - 111
  • [24] Autonomy Support, Motivation, Satisfaction and Physical Activity Level in Physical Education Class
    Fin, Gracielle
    Baretta, Elisabeth
    Antonio Moreno-Murcia, Juan
    Nodari Junior, Rudy Jose
    UNIVERSITAS PSYCHOLOGICA, 2017, 16 (04) : 1 - 12
  • [25] Students' Perceived Support in Relation to Bullying in Physical Education
    O'Connor, Jamie A.
    Graber, Kim C.
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2013, 84 : A52 - A52
  • [26] Autonomy Support in Physical Education in Primary Education from the teacher's perception
    Rijo, Antonio Gomez
    Jimenez, Francisco Jimenez
    Cabrera, J. Miguel Fernandez
    RETOS-NUEVAS TENDENCIAS EN EDUCACION FISICA DEPORTE Y RECREACION, 2023, (48): : 575 - 583
  • [27] Perceived Autonomy Support and Motivation in Young People: A Comparative Investigation of Physical Education and Leisure-Time in Four Countries
    Soos, Istvan
    Dizmatsek, Ibolya
    Ling, Jonathan
    Ojelabi, Adedokun
    Simonek, Jaromir
    Boros-Balint, Iulianna
    Szabo, Peter
    Szabo, Attila
    Hamar, Pal
    EUROPES JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 15 (03): : 509 - 530
  • [28] Perceived teachers' autonomy support, positive behaviour, and misbehaviour in physical education: The roles of advantageous comparison and non-responsibility
    Hsu, Wei-Ting
    Shang, I-Wei
    Hsiao, Chia-Huei
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2021, 27 (03) : 529 - 542
  • [29] How can we boost learning and vitality? the influence of perceived organizational support on innovative behavior
    Bo Meng
    Wei Liu
    Mi Zhou
    Eurasian Business Review, 2024, 14 (4) : 917 - 943
  • [30] Influences of perceived autonomy support on physical activity within the theory of planned behavior
    Chatzisarantis, Nikos L. D.
    Hagger, Martin S.
    Smith, Brett
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 37 (05) : 934 - 954